feat: Modify NIM enablement process

[yzhao583]

https://issues.redhat.com/browse/NVPE-22

Description

Change the enablement process for NIM on the dashboard.

How Has This Been Tested?

Tested locally.

Test Impact

• Go to the Applications -> Explore, and click the tile for NIM.
• On the right side panel, there should be an enable button.
• Click the enable button, a modal should be shown.
• Enter the API key provided by NVIDIA, and click the submit button.
• A processor should be shown to indicate the validation process.
• If validation is successful, the modal should be closed, and a popup showing the success message should be displayed on the right-top corner. The odh-nim-account CR should be generated, and related resources should be generated as well.
• Go to Application -> Enabled, the NIM tile should be there.
• If validation fails, error message should be displayed in the modal and in the popup at the right-top corner.

Request review criteria:

Self checklist (all need to be checked):

• The developer has manually tested the changes and verified that the changes work
• Testing instructions have been added in the PR body (for PRs involving changes that are not immediately obvious).
• The developer has added tests or explained why testing cannot be added (unit or cypress tests for related changes)

If you have UI changes:

• Included any necessary screenshots or gifs if it was a UI change.
• Included tags to the UX team if it was a UI/UX change.

After the PR is posted & before it merges:

• The developer has tested their solution on a cluster by using the image produced by the PR to main

[openshift-ci]

Hi @yzhao583. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a opendatahub-io member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

[andrewballantyne]

/ok-to-test

[andrewballantyne]

Let me delete some resources on dev04 and give this a shot for real this time

[andrewballantyne]

You got some issues around the useWatchIntegrationComponents hook...

[andrewballantyne]

We are close... if we can restructure the new file to not have its own lifecycle and implementation we should be close to good to go. I'll test on the Dev04 cluster and see about how this all works out.

[andrewballantyne]

Hah, 18 comments... not all of these are important for this PR. Lets get the critical ones done first, everything else needs to be logged and another PR put up asap to avoid it not getting done. I'll mark them in 3 stages for simplicity.

🔴 will need to be done -- they are critical / blockers to this PR. (there are 5 of them -- 2 backend, 2 around the mock, 1 delete file)
🟡 will need to be followed up -- but can miss the 2.16; more quality stuff
🟢 are stuff we need to address over time -- likely best to log issues and just approach them asap when time/duty permits

[andrewballantyne]

🟢 As noted in our discussions there are some issues around this button; making them again here for posterity.

• Button doesn't hide after install (after modal closes)
• Button loads then hides if installed
  • I noticed this recently and didn't say anything -- but the isLoading probably should be a Skeleton component until if we know it should be there or not
• Button shows disabled but doesn't show why -- before it was just enablement feature but now it's possible there is another feature flag or criteria from the API

[andrewballantyne]

🟢 We filtered out the item -- so this may end up needing to be a toast -- but those can be kinda finicky -- we don't want to spam it. We'll have to look into our options for this one.

[andrewballantyne]

/approve

Lets get some [manual] testing done and hopefully the CI passes -- then we should be good to wrap this one up.

Two remaining issues that we need follow up issues for -- one & two

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 27.70270% with 107 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 85.38%. Comparing base (8305246) to head (830602b).
Report is 43 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
frontend/src/utilities/useEnableApplication.tsx	1.69%	58 Missing ⚠️
...nd/src/utilities/useWatchIntegrationComponents.tsx	37.73%	33 Missing ⚠️
frontend/src/services/integrationAppService.ts	13.33%	13 Missing ⚠️
...d/src/pages/exploreApplication/GetStartedPanel.tsx	60.00%	2 Missing ⚠️
...pages/exploreApplication/useIntegratedAppStatus.ts	87.50%	1 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #3455      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   85.59%   85.38%   -0.21%     
==========================================
  Files        1344     1352       +8     
  Lines       30552    30860     +308     
  Branches     8471     8612     +141     
==========================================
+ Hits        26150    26349     +199     
- Misses       4402     4511     +109     

Files with missing lines	Coverage Δ
.../pages/enabledApplications/EnabledApplications.tsx	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
...ntend/src/pages/exploreApplication/EnableModal.tsx	32.07% <ø> (ø)
frontend/src/types.ts	100.00% <ø> (ø)
frontend/src/utilities/utils.ts	74.16% <100.00%> (+0.89%)	⬆️
...pages/exploreApplication/useIntegratedAppStatus.ts	87.50% <87.50%> (ø)
...d/src/pages/exploreApplication/GetStartedPanel.tsx	62.96% <60.00%> (-3.71%)	⬇️
frontend/src/services/integrationAppService.ts	13.33% <13.33%> (ø)
...nd/src/utilities/useWatchIntegrationComponents.tsx	37.73% <37.73%> (ø)
frontend/src/utilities/useEnableApplication.tsx	28.26% <1.69%> (-13.01%)	⬇️

... and 91 files with indirect coverage changes

---

Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 8305246...830602b. Read the comment docs.

[openshift-ci]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: andrewballantyne

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS [andrewballantyne]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment