-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 342
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add backend validation for insurance fields in patient registration #2589
Add backend validation for insurance fields in patient registration #2589
Conversation
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe changes introduce a new Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (4)
care/facility/models/patient.py (2)
197-200
: Consider adding field-level validation and documentation for insurance fields.The new insurance fields look good, but they could benefit from some enhancements:
Consider applying these improvements:
- member_id = models.CharField(max_length=255, blank=False, null=False) - policy_id = models.CharField(max_length=255, blank=False, null=False) - insurer_id = models.CharField(max_length=255, blank=False, null=False) - insurer_name = models.CharField(max_length=255, blank=False, null=False) + member_id = models.CharField( + max_length=255, + blank=False, + null=False, + help_text="Insurance member identification number", + validators=[RegexValidator(r'^[A-Za-z0-9-]+$', 'Only alphanumeric characters and hyphens are allowed.')], + ) + policy_id = models.CharField( + max_length=255, + blank=False, + null=False, + help_text="Insurance policy number", + validators=[RegexValidator(r'^[A-Za-z0-9-]+$', 'Only alphanumeric characters and hyphens are allowed.')], + ) + insurer_id = models.CharField( + max_length=255, + blank=False, + null=False, + help_text="Unique identifier for the insurance provider", + validators=[RegexValidator(r'^[A-Za-z0-9-]+$', 'Only alphanumeric characters and hyphens are allowed.')], + ) + insurer_name = models.CharField( + max_length=255, + blank=False, + null=False, + help_text="Name of the insurance provider", + validators=[RegexValidator(r'^[A-Za-z\s]+$', 'Only alphabetic characters and spaces are allowed.')], + )
197-200
: Consider adding database indexes for frequently queried fields.Since these insurance fields are likely to be frequently queried (especially
member_id
andpolicy_id
), adding indexes would improve query performance.Consider adding database indexes:
- member_id = models.CharField(max_length=255, blank=False, null=False) - policy_id = models.CharField(max_length=255, blank=False, null=False) + member_id = models.CharField(max_length=255, blank=False, null=False, db_index=True) + policy_id = models.CharField(max_length=255, blank=False, null=False, db_index=True)care/facility/api/serializers/patient.py (2)
58-58
: Consistency in string quotations would improve code uniformity.At line 58, replacing single quotes with double quotes for the
fields
attribute could enhance consistency with the rest of the codebase.🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff
58-58: Single quotes found but double quotes preferred
Replace single quotes with double quotes
(Q000)
62-62
: Consider assigning exception messages to variables.Assigning the error messages to variables before raising exceptions can improve readability and make future modifications more manageable.
Apply this diff to implement the changes:
def validate_member_id(self, value): if not value: - raise serializers.ValidationError("Member ID is required.") + error_message = "Member ID is required." + raise serializers.ValidationError(error_message) return value def validate_policy_id(self, value): if not value: - raise serializers.ValidationError("Policy ID is required.") + error_message = "Policy ID is required." + raise serializers.ValidationError(error_message) return value def validate_insurer_id(self, value): if not value: - raise serializers.ValidationError("Insurer ID is required.") + error_message = "Insurer ID is required." + raise serializers.ValidationError(error_message) return value def validate_insurer_name(self, value): if not value: - raise serializers.ValidationError("Insurer name is required.") + error_message = "Insurer name is required." + raise serializers.ValidationError(error_message) return valueAlso applies to: 67-67, 72-72, 77-77
🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff
62-62: Exception must not use a string literal, assign to variable first
Assign to variable; remove string literal
(EM101)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
care/facility/api/serializers/patient.py
(1 hunks)care/facility/models/patient.py
(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Ruff
care/facility/api/serializers/patient.py
58-58: Single quotes found but double quotes preferred
Replace single quotes with double quotes
(Q000)
62-62: Exception must not use a string literal, assign to variable first
Assign to variable; remove string literal
(EM101)
67-67: Exception must not use a string literal, assign to variable first
Assign to variable; remove string literal
(EM101)
72-72: Exception must not use a string literal, assign to variable first
Assign to variable; remove string literal
(EM101)
77-77: Exception must not use a string literal, assign to variable first
Assign to variable; remove string literal
(EM101)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
care/facility/models/patient.py (1)
197-200
: Verify the maximum length requirement for insurance fields.
The current max_length of 255 characters seems... generous for insurance-related fields. Most insurance IDs and policy numbers are significantly shorter.
Let's check if there are any existing insurance-related fields in the codebase that might give us a clue about the typical length:
member_id = models.CharField(max_length=255, blank=False, null=False) | ||
policy_id = models.CharField(max_length=255, blank=False, null=False) | ||
insurer_id = models.CharField(max_length=255, blank=False, null=False) | ||
insurer_name = models.CharField(max_length=255, blank=False, null=False) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider using choices for insurer_name field.
Since insurance providers are typically a finite set of companies, it might be more appropriate to use choices.
Consider adding an enum for insurance providers:
+ class InsurerEnum(enum.Enum):
+ AETNA = "Aetna"
+ CIGNA = "Cigna"
+ UNITED = "UnitedHealthcare"
+ ANTHEM = "Anthem"
+ HUMANA = "Humana"
+ OTHER = "Other"
+
+ InsurerChoices = [(e.value, e.name) for e in InsurerEnum]
+
- insurer_name = models.CharField(max_length=255, blank=False, null=False)
+ insurer_name = models.CharField(
+ max_length=255,
+ blank=False,
+ null=False,
+ choices=InsurerChoices,
+ help_text="Name of the insurance provider"
+ )
This would help standardize the insurer names and make it easier to work with the data later.
Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
class PatientRegistrationSerializer(serializers.ModelSerializer): | ||
member_id = serializers.CharField(required=True) | ||
policy_id = serializers.CharField(required=True) | ||
insurer_id = serializers.CharField(required=True) | ||
insurer_name = serializers.CharField(required=True) | ||
|
||
class Meta: | ||
model = PatientRegistration | ||
fields = '__all__' | ||
|
||
def validate_member_id(self, value): | ||
if not value: | ||
raise serializers.ValidationError("Member ID is required.") | ||
return value | ||
|
||
def validate_policy_id(self, value): | ||
if not value: | ||
raise serializers.ValidationError("Policy ID is required.") | ||
return value | ||
|
||
def validate_insurer_id(self, value): | ||
if not value: | ||
raise serializers.ValidationError("Insurer ID is required.") | ||
return value | ||
|
||
def validate_insurer_name(self, value): | ||
if not value: | ||
raise serializers.ValidationError("Insurer name is required.") | ||
return value | ||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Refactor redundant validation methods for efficiency.
The validation methods for member_id
, policy_id
, insurer_id
, and insurer_name
are similar. Overriding the validate
method to handle all required fields could reduce code duplication.
Apply this diff to refactor the validations:
class PatientRegistrationSerializer(serializers.ModelSerializer):
member_id = serializers.CharField(required=True)
policy_id = serializers.CharField(required=True)
insurer_id = serializers.CharField(required=True)
insurer_name = serializers.CharField(required=True)
class Meta:
model = PatientRegistration
fields = "__all__"
- def validate_member_id(self, value):
- error_message = "Member ID is required."
- if not value:
- raise serializers.ValidationError(error_message)
- return value
-
- def validate_policy_id(self, value):
- error_message = "Policy ID is required."
- if not value:
- raise serializers.ValidationError(error_message)
- return value
-
- def validate_insurer_id(self, value):
- error_message = "Insurer ID is required."
- if not value:
- raise serializers.ValidationError(error_message)
- return value
-
- def validate_insurer_name(self, value):
- error_message = "Insurer name is required."
- if not value:
- raise serializers.ValidationError(error_message)
- return value
+ def validate(self, data):
+ required_fields = ['member_id', 'policy_id', 'insurer_id', 'insurer_name']
+ for field in required_fields:
+ if not data.get(field):
+ error_message = f"{field.replace('_', ' ').title()} is required."
+ raise serializers.ValidationError({field: error_message})
+ return data
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
class PatientRegistrationSerializer(serializers.ModelSerializer): | |
member_id = serializers.CharField(required=True) | |
policy_id = serializers.CharField(required=True) | |
insurer_id = serializers.CharField(required=True) | |
insurer_name = serializers.CharField(required=True) | |
class Meta: | |
model = PatientRegistration | |
fields = '__all__' | |
def validate_member_id(self, value): | |
if not value: | |
raise serializers.ValidationError("Member ID is required.") | |
return value | |
def validate_policy_id(self, value): | |
if not value: | |
raise serializers.ValidationError("Policy ID is required.") | |
return value | |
def validate_insurer_id(self, value): | |
if not value: | |
raise serializers.ValidationError("Insurer ID is required.") | |
return value | |
def validate_insurer_name(self, value): | |
if not value: | |
raise serializers.ValidationError("Insurer name is required.") | |
return value | |
class PatientRegistrationSerializer(serializers.ModelSerializer): | |
member_id = serializers.CharField(required=True) | |
policy_id = serializers.CharField(required=True) | |
insurer_id = serializers.CharField(required=True) | |
insurer_name = serializers.CharField(required=True) | |
class Meta: | |
model = PatientRegistration | |
fields = "__all__" | |
def validate(self, data): | |
required_fields = ['member_id', 'policy_id', 'insurer_id', 'insurer_name'] | |
for field in required_fields: | |
if not data.get(field): | |
error_message = f"{field.replace('_', ' ').title()} is required." | |
raise serializers.ValidationError({field: error_message}) | |
return data |
🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff
58-58: Single quotes found but double quotes preferred
Replace single quotes with double quotes
(Q000)
62-62: Exception must not use a string literal, assign to variable first
Assign to variable; remove string literal
(EM101)
67-67: Exception must not use a string literal, assign to variable first
Assign to variable; remove string literal
(EM101)
72-72: Exception must not use a string literal, assign to variable first
Assign to variable; remove string literal
(EM101)
77-77: Exception must not use a string literal, assign to variable first
Assign to variable; remove string literal
(EM101)
Proposed Changes
insurer_name
,insurer_id
,member_id
, andpolicy_id
fields in the patient registration form.Associated Issue
Architecture changes
Merge Checklist
@ohcnetwork/care-backend-maintainers @ohcnetwork/care-backend-admins
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
PatientRegistration
feature with mandatory fields for insurance details (member ID, policy ID, insurer ID, and insurer name).Bug Fixes