fix: use query string for entitlements method input #13
Conversation
|
Caution Review failedThe pull request is closed. WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request involve modifications to the entitlements method, specifically updating its input format to a query string. This change enhances how parameters are processed within the method. Additionally, a new entry has been added to the changelog for version Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅ 📢 Thoughts on this report? Let us know! |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (5)
.changelog/v2.0.1/bug-fixes/12-entitlements-queries.md (1)
1-1: Consider enhancing the changelog entry with more detailsWhile the current entry is clear, it would be more helpful to users if it included:
- The reason for switching to query string input
- Any breaking changes in the API contract
- Examples of the old vs new format
Example enhancement:
-- Switch entitlements method input to a query string. ([#12](https://github.com/noble-assets/halo/pull/12)) +- Switch entitlements method input to use query string parameters for improved REST compliance and easier URL construction. This changes how parameters are passed to the PublicCapability and RoleCapability endpoints. ([#13](https://github.com/noble-assets/halo/pull/13)) + + Example: + Before: `/entitlements/v1/{param}` + After: `/entitlements/v1?param=value`CHANGELOG.md (1)
5-5: Improve markdown formatting by using proper headingInstead of using emphasis (*) for the date, consider using a proper heading format for better consistency and accessibility.
Apply this diff to improve the formatting:
-*Nov 13, 2024* +### Nov 13, 2024🧰 Tools
🪛 Markdownlint
5-5: null
Emphasis used instead of a heading(MD036, no-emphasis-as-heading)
proto/halo/entitlements/v1/query.proto (1)
29-29: LGTM! Consistent with PublicCapability endpoint change.The endpoint change maintains consistency with the PublicCapability update and follows the same improved REST practices.
Consider adding API documentation or OpenAPI/Swagger annotations to clearly indicate that the
methodparameter should now be passed as a query string parameter. This will help with API discoverability and client integration.Example annotation you might want to add:
option (google.api.http) = { get: "/halo/entitlements/v1/role_capability" // Additional OpenAPI annotations can document query parameters };api/entitlements/v1/query.pulsar.go (2)
Line range hint
1-4: Generated Code Should Not Be Manually ModifiedThe file
query.pulsar.gois generated byprotoc-gen-go-pulsarand includes a noticeDO NOT EDIT. Any manual changes to this file may be overwritten when the code is regenerated from the.protodefinitions. To make changes, consider updating the source.protofiles instead.
Line range hint
16-18: Add Comments to Exported Types and MethodsThe exported types and methods, such as
fastReflection_QueryOwner, lack comments. According to Go best practices and the Effective Go guidelines, each exported identifier should have a comment that begins with the identifier’s name. This improves code readability and maintainability.Consider adding documentation comments in the
.protofiles to include them in the generated code.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (2)
types/entitlements/query.pb.gois excluded by!**/*.pb.gotypes/entitlements/query.pb.gw.gois excluded by!**/*.pb.gw.go
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
.changelog/v2.0.1/bug-fixes/12-entitlements-queries.md(1 hunks).changelog/v2.0.1/summary.md(1 hunks)CHANGELOG.md(1 hunks)api/entitlements/v1/query.pulsar.go(2 hunks)proto/halo/entitlements/v1/query.proto(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Markdownlint
.changelog/v2.0.1/summary.md
1-1: null
Emphasis used instead of a heading
(MD036, no-emphasis-as-heading)
CHANGELOG.md
5-5: null
Emphasis used instead of a heading
(MD036, no-emphasis-as-heading)
🔇 Additional comments (4)
.changelog/v2.0.1/bug-fixes/12-entitlements-queries.md (1)
1-1: Verify PR reference number
The changelog entry references PR #12, but this is PR #13. Please verify and update the PR reference number for accuracy.
✅ Verification successful
PR reference is correct, no changes needed
The PR reference in the changelog entry is correct. PR #12 was merged and contained the v2 release preparation, while PR #13 (this PR) is implementing the changes mentioned in the changelog. The changelog entry is correctly placed in the v2.0.1 directory and references PR #12 as part of the release documentation.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify PR numbers and their relationship
# Check if PR #12 exists and is related to this change
gh pr view 12 --json title,state,body
# Check if this PR (#13) is linked to or supersedes #12
gh pr view 13 --json title,state,body
Length of output: 1447
CHANGELOG.md (1)
3-11: LGTM on changelog structure and versioning
The changelog entry follows proper semantic versioning (v2.0.1 for a non-consensus breaking patch) and includes clear categorization of changes under "BUG FIXES".
🧰 Tools
🪛 Markdownlint
5-5: null
Emphasis used instead of a heading
(MD036, no-emphasis-as-heading)
proto/halo/entitlements/v1/query.proto (1)
24-24: LGTM! Moving method to query string improves API design.
The change from path parameter to query string for the method parameter follows better REST practices and provides more flexibility. This is a good architectural improvement.
Let's verify the impact on existing API clients:
✅ Verification successful
Moving method parameter to query string is safe to proceed
The code analysis shows that the change only affects the HTTP endpoint configuration while maintaining the same protobuf message structure. The impacted files are all generated code (*.pulsar.go) and genesis initialization, which properly handle the method parameter regardless of how it's passed in the URL. No direct HTTP client implementations were found that would break due to this change.
- The method field remains in the QueryPublicCapability message type
- Generated code in query.pulsar.go handles the parameter correctly
- Genesis.go uses the parameter through the proper API abstractions
- No custom client implementations found that directly use the URL pattern
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Search for direct API calls to the old endpoint pattern to identify affected clients
# Search for the old endpoint pattern in the codebase
rg -l "/halo/entitlements/v1/public_capability/[^\"'\s/]+"
# Search for potential HTTP client calls
rg -l "PublicCapability.*method.*=.*[^\"'\s/]+"
Length of output: 231
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's examine the actual usage in these files to understand the impact
echo "=== Checking genesis.go ==="
rg -A 5 -B 5 "PublicCapability.*method" genesis.go
echo -e "\n=== Checking api/entitlements/v1/query.pulsar.go ==="
rg -A 5 -B 5 "PublicCapability.*method" api/entitlements/v1/query.pulsar.go
echo -e "\n=== Checking api/entitlements/v1/tx.pulsar.go ==="
rg -A 5 -B 5 "PublicCapability.*method" api/entitlements/v1/tx.pulsar.go
echo -e "\n=== Checking api/entitlements/v1/events.pulsar.go ==="
rg -A 5 -B 5 "PublicCapability.*method" api/entitlements/v1/events.pulsar.go
Length of output: 14351
api/entitlements/v1/query.pulsar.go (1)
Line range hint 4601-4730: Verify Proper Handling of All Role Enum Values
In QueryRoleCapabilityResponse and QueryUserCapabilityResponse, the Roles field utilizes the Role enum. Ensure that all possible enum values are correctly handled in the codebase to prevent potential issues with unhandled or default cases.
Run the following script to find all usages of the Role enum and verify that all enum values are accounted for:
✅ Verification successful
Based on the search results, I can see that the Role enum is well-defined with all its values and properly handled throughout the codebase:
- All enum values are clearly defined:
Role_ROLE_UNSPECIFIED Role = 0
Role_ROLE_DOMESTIC_FEEDER Role = 1
Role_ROLE_INTERNATIONAL_FEEDER Role = 2
Role_ROLE_DOMESTIC_SDYF Role = 3
Role_ROLE_INTERNATIONAL_SDYF Role = 4
Role_ROLE_FUND_ADMIN Role = 5
Role_ROLE_LIQUIDITY_PROVIDER Role = 6- The codebase has proper validation of roles:
_, roleExists := entitlements.Role_value[msg.Role.String()]
if !roleExists {
return nil, errors.Wrapf(entitlements.ErrInvalidRole, "role %s does not exist", msg.Role)
}- Default handling is implemented using
Role_ROLE_UNSPECIFIEDwhen role is not set.
All Role enum values are properly defined and handled
The codebase demonstrates comprehensive handling of the Role enum:
- Complete set of role values defined
- Validation checks for role existence
- Proper default value handling
- Type-safe enum usage in protobuf messages
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Search for all usages of the Role enum in Go files.
# Find all occurrences of Role enum values in the codebase.
rg --type go 'Role_' --context 2
Length of output: 14787
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes for Version 2.0.1
New Features
Bug Fixes
Documentation