-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 24
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
DOC: Revise *dMRIPrep*'s road-map #147
Conversation
Resolves: nipreps#116.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks great! Thank you for organizing these ideas. I'm getting excited about the next coming months.
Co-authored-by: Michael Joseph <[email protected]>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for updating this!
Co-authored-by: Ariel Rokem <[email protected]>
This release will also include Salim's efforts in `#144 <https://github.com/nipreps/dmriprep/pull/144>`__ | ||
to provide a temporary implementation of head-motion and eddy-currents correction using | ||
FSL's ``eddy``. | ||
This temporary solution will be replaced by our 3dSHORE-based algorithm ported from QSIPREP, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can we go ahead and name it yet? I thought Eddy Motion Correction is pretty good...
|
||
Version 1.0 (Targetted for September 2021) | ||
------------------------------------------ | ||
Wrap-up evaluation Phase II with the first stable release of *dMRIPrep*. | ||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think it might be helpful to clarify that dmriprep is both dataset-adaptive (i.e. to heterogeneous acquisition/encoding schemes, available metadata) and user-configurable (i.e. providing the option to run denoising or not if associated compute cost would be too high, susceptibility distortion correction or not if the available data doesn't support it).
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
user-configurable (i.e. providing the option to run denoising or not if associated compute cost would be too high, susceptibility distortion correction or not if the available data doesn't support it).
I would prefer it were not very configurable - and that requires a lot of solid heuristics. But the less human intervention, the better.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Fair enough.
Though I think at least the former (i.e. dataset adaptive) is a key selling point since there are good reasons to think that the same steps are not optimal for all types of dMRI data...
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Sorry, I had proposed these changes a few days ago but forgot to submit.
Co-authored-by: Michael Joseph <[email protected]>
Resolves: #116.