Improvement of chapter "Výrazové prostředky" #1063
Conversation
The term 'výrazové prostředky' is correct, but a regular developer understands the word "syntaxe/syntaktický prostředek" better, the title could be alternatively shorter "Syntaktické prostředky". I suggest rearranging the order of items and putting service calls in second place - so that it is possible to give an example with a call to a non-static service method as a demonstration of services. I suggest separating the creation of objects from the use of methods and functions for clarity. I suggest adding these missing means: - calling a non-static service method - using a public service property
|
Notice: The syntaxe of public property of service is cofusing: @myservice::$publicProperty() You MUST use brackets, but brackets is syntax´element generally used in functions/methods, so I will send another PR with the proposal to at least add alias syntax WITHOUT brackets: @myservice::$publicProperty |
|
After deep discussion on nette forum here: https://forum.nette.org/cs/36714-rfc-upravit-matouci-syntaxi-public-property-sluzby-v-services-neon and continue on deep testing I found out that the syntax for public properties is implemented correctly: @myservice::publicProperty But this syntax is missing in documentation. Based on newly discovered facts I close this PR for changes in documentation and create a new one with updated correct proposal. |
|
Prosímtě, do PR můžeš dál forcepushovat změny. Nevytvářej prosím nové kvůli každé úpravě. |
The term 'výrazové prostředky' is correct, but a regular developer understands the word "syntaxe/syntaktický prostředek" better, the title could be alternatively shorter "Syntaktické prostředky".
I suggest:
rearranging the order of items and putting service calls in second place - so that it is possible to give an example with a call to a non-static service method as a demonstration of services.
separating the creation of objects from the use of methods and functions for clarity.
adding these missing items: