[FIXED] Catchup must not extend past requested sequence range

[MauriceVanVeen]

When we're being asked to provide data within a range during catchup, we should not extend that range and provide more data. Especially since that range was defined by a snapshot, which also specifies which RAFT entries should be sent after processing that snapshot. This would just result in duplicated work and possible desync for the follower, so these lines can safely be removed.

Timeline of these lines:
Previously when receiving a catchup request the FirstSeq could be moved up to match what the state says:
[IMPROVED] Catchup improvements #3348 (August, 2022)

Afterward this was removed in favor of only extending the LastSeq:
[FIXED] KeyValue not found after server restarts #5054 (February, 2024)

This was done to solve for KeyValue not found issues.
However this change would have also fixed that case:
[FIXED] Do not bump clfs on seq mismatch when before stream LastSeq #5821 (August, 2024)

Signed-off-by: Maurice van Veen [email protected]

[neilalexander]

LGTM!

This makes sense to me as we don't want the upper stream state to surpass what Raft has told us that it should be.

If a snapshot takes us up to, say, message 50, then the upper layer catch-up must only be up to that point, as we'd expect the Raft machinery to take over again after that point. Otherwise we end up with duplicate work and the much higher potential to hit lseq-clfs mismatch during.

[derekcollison]

This is till marked draft, lmk if this should be merged.

[MauriceVanVeen]

This is till marked draft, lmk if this should be merged.

Marked ready for review/merge now 🙂

I've put these PRs up as draft so these could first be discussed with some colleagues before opening up.