-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
DMI standardproblem #63
base: dev
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
nice that these exist :)
I have added 3 more tests for AFM. They still use the same setup as the 3 standard problems. The AFM exchange parameters are set to 0 and both sublattices are initialized in the same way. The magnetization of the AFM is then compared to the FM result. |
I'm not sure how useful these AFM versions are as tests. They don't simulate physical systems and only test part of the used kernel functions. For us it's good to know that they work, but I think we need more formal/complete tests in this case. |
They don't test enough, but if it's good for us to know, then it's good that they exist :) |
Yes. Perhaps these can be removed later on when we develop more general ones. |
I have created the 1D, 2D and 3D DMI standarproblems from here. For each problem I initialize the system and let it minimize. Then I compare the magnetization obtained in mumax⁺ by the one obtained in mumax³.