Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Motechupgrade (#4) #5

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: motech-2.0
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Motechupgrade (#4) #5

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

gudipatiharitha
Copy link

  • Java to Java 8, Datanucleus to 4.0 , Spring to Core -- In Progress

  • TODO Upgrade at 6 places -- mostly with security

  • Spring test libraries upgrade - In Progress

  • Datanucleus 4.1.0

  • Spring 4.3 -- tests passed. checking PIT

  • Fixed Null pointer

  • Fixed server start issues.
    Fixed issues w.r.t OSGI update

  • SPring-JMS and integaration in Progress and few IT test cases commendted

  • Fixed some of the failing tests

  • removed problematic dependency

  • Fixing PIT and OSGI/felix related changes

  • Fixing PIT and OSGI/felix related changes

  • lang3 versions

  • removing gemini mock ( added unintentionally dhiraj)

  • Changed to ERROR mode

  • Changing all xsd's inspring 3 to Spring 4.
    Fixing javax.persistenec error
    Fixing Event errors
    Fixing OSGi upgrade issues
    Upgrade commons-loggin !
    osgi-web-util errors

  • Guava, Itextpdf, paranemer - Inprogress

  • Guava, jsr305 ,

  • Mysql

  • GSON errors and postgresql

  • Removed fixed TODO's

  • Replaced depricated DefaultAnnotationHandlerMapping with RequestMappingHandlerMapping in bootstrap-servlet.xml

  • Fixed ResetControllerTest

  • Fixed MdsRestControllerTest

  • Fixed a failing test in BootstrapControllerTest

  • Added Dependency for openid4javaNoDeps.

  • Added Active MQ Broker and Client which replaced active MQ Broker used earlier.

  • Updated felix version

  • Fixed dependency issue for gemini blueprint

  • Added custom bundle of spring web and used in motech project.

* Java to Java 8, Datanucleus to 4.0 , Spring to Core -- In Progress

* TODO Upgrade at 6 places -- mostly with security

* Spring test libraries upgrade - In Progress

* Datanucleus 4.1.0

* Spring 4.3 -- tests passed. checking PIT

* Fixed Null pointer

* Fixed server start issues.
Fixed issues w.r.t OSGI update

* SPring-JMS and integaration in Progress and few IT test cases commendted

* Fixed some of the failing tests

* removed problematic dependency

* Fixing PIT and OSGI/felix related changes

* Fixing PIT and OSGI/felix related changes

* lang3 versions

* removing gemini mock ( added unintentionally dhiraj)

* Changed to ERROR mode

* Changing all xsd's inspring 3 to Spring 4.
Fixing javax.persistenec error
Fixing Event errors
Fixing OSGi upgrade issues
Upgrade commons-loggin !
osgi-web-util errors

* Guava, Itextpdf, paranemer - Inprogress

* Guava, jsr305 ,

* Mysql

* GSON errors and postgresql

* Removed fixed TODO's

* Replaced depricated DefaultAnnotationHandlerMapping with RequestMappingHandlerMapping in bootstrap-servlet.xml

* Fixed ResetControllerTest

* Fixed MdsRestControllerTest

* Fixed a failing test in BootstrapControllerTest

* Added Dependency for openid4javaNoDeps.

* Added Active MQ Broker and Client which replaced active MQ Broker used earlier.

* Updated felix version

* Fixed dependency issue for gemini blueprint

* Added custom bundle of spring web and used in motech project.
@@ -23,19 +23,19 @@ public void setResetForm(ResetForm resetForm) {
this.resetForm = resetForm;
}

public boolean isResetSucceed() {
public boolean isIsResetSucceed() {

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Did you mean to make this change? isResetSucceed makes more sense to me, so wondering whether it maybe got changed along with setIsResetSucceed below by mistake.

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

will change it back -- looks like this was tried along with other changes to fix PIT's - but eventually not needed.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants