feat: add search room list #54
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces several enhancements across multiple files. It adds a new image handling configuration in Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 6
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (13)
src/uikit/Container.tsx (2)
4-10: Consider adding default props and prop documentation.The component implementation is clean and follows React best practices. However, to improve maintainability and developer experience, consider adding:
- JSDoc documentation describing the component's purpose and usage
- PropTypes or TypeScript interface documentation for better IDE support
+/** + * A responsive container component that provides consistent padding and layout. + * Wraps content in a flex container with responsive horizontal padding. + * + * @example + * <Container> + * <YourContent /> + * </Container> + */ export function Container(props: FlexProps) { return ( <Flex px={{ base: 5, lg: 10 }} w='100%' flexDir='column' {...props}>
6-6: Consider extracting responsive values to theme tokens.The padding values are currently hardcoded. For better maintainability and consistency across the application, consider moving these values to theme tokens.
- <Flex px={{ base: 5, lg: 10 }} w='100%' flexDir='column' {...props}> + <Flex px={{ base: 'containerPaddingBase', lg: 'containerPaddingLg' }} w='100%' flexDir='column' {...props}>Then define these in your theme:
// theme.ts export const space = { containerPaddingBase: '1.25rem', // 5 in Chakra's default scale containerPaddingLg: '2.5rem', // 10 in Chakra's default scale }src/modules/room/roomEntity.ts (2)
11-13: Consider using consistent naming conventionThe property
total_channeluses snake_case while TypeScript conventionally uses camelCase. Consider renaming it tototalChannelto maintain consistency with TypeScript conventions and match the corresponding property in theRoomtype.- total_channel: z.number().default(0), + totalChannel: z.number().default(0),
25-27: LGTM! Consider matching property order with schemaThe type definitions are correct and properly aligned with the schema. For better maintainability, consider ordering the properties to match the order in
ApiRoomSchema.export type Room = { serial: string; name: string; description: string; + tags: string[]; totalChannel: number; rate: number; - tags: string[]; };src/uikit/Layout.tsx (1)
19-21: Background styling looks good, but let's track the TODO.The background image styling properties are appropriate for responsive design. However, the TODO comment indicates this is a temporary solution pending a home page image fix.
Would you like me to create a GitHub issue to track this TODO and ensure it's not forgotten? This will help prevent technical debt.
src/modules/room/roomService.ts (1)
43-53: Consider adding error handling and type validation.While the response structure is correct, consider these improvements:
- Add error handling for failed responses
- Validate required fields before mapping
- Use type guards to ensure data safety
Consider applying this enhancement:
return { + // Add type guard to ensure data integrity + rooms: Array.isArray(response.data) ? response.data.map((room) => { + // Validate required fields + if (!room.serial || !room.name) { + throw new Error('Invalid room data: missing required fields'); + } return { serial: room.serial, name: room.name, description: room.description, tags: room.tags, totalChannel: room.total_channel, rate: room.rate, }; - })), + }) : [], pagination: response.metadata?.pagination, };next.config.js (1)
29-32: Consider environment-specific configurationThe hardcoded values for protocol and hostname could be made configurable through environment variables, similar to other configurations in this file.
Example implementation:
{ - protocol: 'https', - hostname: 'placehold.co', + protocol: process.env.IMAGE_PROTOCOL || 'https', + hostname: process.env.IMAGE_HOSTNAME || 'placehold.co', port: '', pathname: '/**', }public/locales/id/common.json (1)
25-25: Consider enhancing the search results message.The current translation uses "kamar" (room) which is less formal. Consider using "ruangan" instead to maintain consistency with the title translations and provide a more professional tone.
- "found_rooms": "<b>Ditemukan {{count}}</b> kamar yang cocok dengan filter Anda", + "found_rooms": "<b>Ditemukan {{count}}</b> ruangan yang cocok dengan filter Anda",src/modules/room/RoomCardItem.tsx (3)
18-20: Add JSDoc documentation for the Props type.Consider adding documentation to improve code maintainability and developer experience.
+/** + * Props for the RoomCardItem component + * @property {Room} room - The room data to display in the card + */ type Props = { room: Room; };
22-22: Consider making MAX_TAG_SHOW_COUNT more maintainable.The constant would benefit from documentation and potentially being configurable via props or environment variables.
+/** + * Maximum number of tags to display before showing a "+X more" tooltip + * @constant {number} + */ -const MAX_TAG_SHOW_COUNT = 2; +const MAX_TAG_SHOW_COUNT = process.env.NEXT_PUBLIC_MAX_TAG_SHOW_COUNT ?? 2;
54-83: Improve mobile responsiveness for tags section.The current implementation hides tags on mobile (
display={{ base: 'none', md: 'flex' }}). Consider a more mobile-friendly approach.Instead of hiding tags on mobile, consider:
- Showing them in a scrollable horizontal container
- Stacking them vertically below the main content
- Or showing them in an expandable section
-<HStack spacing={3} display={{ base: 'none', md: 'flex' }}> +<HStack + spacing={3} + overflowX={{ base: 'auto', md: 'visible' }} + width="100%" + sx={{ + '::-webkit-scrollbar': { + display: 'none' + } + }}>src/modules/room/RoomSearchContainer.tsx (2)
64-64: Memoize the debouncedonChangehandler to improve performance.Currently, the debounced function is recreated on every render, which may lead to unnecessary re-renders. Memoize the debounced handler using
useMemo.Here's how you can implement it:
+ const debouncedSetQuery = useMemo(() => debounce((value) => setQuery(value), 300), []); + // ... - onChange={debounce((e) => setQuery(e.target.value), 300)} + onChange={(e) => debouncedSetQuery(e.target.value)}Don't forget to import
useMemofromreact:+ import { useState, useMemo } from 'react';
82-85: Address the TODO comment regarding pagination.The TODO indicates the need to update the room count using pagination data after implementing infinite scroll. This will enhance accuracy in displaying the number of rooms matching the filters.
Would you like assistance in implementing the pagination functionality or creating a GitHub issue to track this task?
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (13)
next.config.js(1 hunks)public/locales/en/common.json(1 hunks)public/locales/id/common.json(1 hunks)src/modules/landingPage/LandingPageContainer.tsx(2 hunks)src/modules/room/RoomCardItem.tsx(1 hunks)src/modules/room/RoomSearchContainer.tsx(1 hunks)src/modules/room/roomEntity.ts(2 hunks)src/modules/room/roomService.ts(3 hunks)src/theme/global.css(1 hunks)src/theme/index.ts(1 hunks)src/uikit/Container.tsx(1 hunks)src/uikit/Header.tsx(2 hunks)src/uikit/Layout.tsx(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (18)
src/uikit/Container.tsx (2)
1-2: LGTM! Clean and specific imports.
The imports are well-organized, separating types from components.
6-8: Verify prop spreading order for proper override behavior.
The current implementation spreads props after defining default styles. This is correct as it allows consumers to override default styles when needed. However, ensure this behavior is documented and tested.
✅ Verification successful
Based on the search results, I can now generate a final response as we have sufficient information about the Container component's usage across the codebase.
Props spreading order in Container component is correctly implemented
The Container component's implementation with props spreading after default styles is correct and consistent with best practices. The search results show that:
- The component is used across multiple pages and modules with different prop combinations
- No instances of style override issues were found in the usage patterns
- The implementation allows proper customization while maintaining default styles as fallback
The current implementation in src/uikit/Container.tsx follows the correct pattern:
<Flex px={{ base: 5, lg: 10 }} w='100%' flexDir='column' {...props}>where default styles are defined first and props are spread afterward, allowing proper override behavior.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for any instances where Container's default styles might be causing issues
ast-grep --pattern 'Container $props'
Length of output: 39
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for Container component usage patterns
rg "Container" -A 2 -B 2
# Also check for any test files related to Container
fd "Container.test" -t f
# Look for Container component with spread operator pattern
ast-grep --pattern '<Container {...$_}>'
Length of output: 7161
src/modules/landingPage/LandingPageContainer.tsx (2)
1-1: LGTM! Clean import statement.
The import of the Container component follows React best practices.
13-19: LGTM! Good structural improvement.
The addition of the Container wrapper improves the component hierarchy by:
- Centralizing layout control
- Providing consistent padding and responsive behavior
- Following component composition best practices
src/modules/room/roomEntity.ts (1)
11-13: Verify search implementation handles new properties
Since these new properties are part of the room search feature, let's verify their implementation in the search functionality.
Also applies to: 25-27
✅ Verification successful
Search implementation properly handles new room properties
The search implementation correctly handles the new properties (tags, total_channel, rate):
- The properties are properly mapped in
roomService.tswhen transforming API response - The search functionality passes these properties through to the room card components
- The search query implementation in
roomHook.tsandRoomSearchContainer.tsxmaintains a clean separation of concerns
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check how these new properties are used in search-related components
# Check for search-related files that might use these properties
echo "Searching for files handling room search..."
rg -l "searchRoom|SearchRoom" --type ts --type tsx
# Check how the new properties are used in components
echo "\nChecking usage of new properties in components..."
rg -A 3 "tags|totalChannel|rate" --type tsx
Length of output: 364
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach without file type restrictions
# Search for room search related files
echo "Searching for files handling room search..."
rg -l "searchRoom|SearchRoom"
# Check usage of the new properties
echo -e "\nChecking usage of new properties..."
rg -A 3 "(tags|total_channel|rate).*room"
# Look for any search-related components or functions
echo -e "\nChecking for search implementations..."
ast-grep --pattern 'function $FUNC($$$) {
$$$
search$$$Room
$$$
}'
Length of output: 868
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's examine the search implementation details
# Check RoomSearchContainer implementation
echo "Checking RoomSearchContainer implementation..."
cat src/modules/room/RoomSearchContainer.tsx
# Check room service search implementation
echo -e "\nChecking room service search implementation..."
cat src/modules/room/roomService.ts
# Check room hook search implementation
echo -e "\nChecking room hook implementation..."
cat src/modules/room/roomHook.ts
Length of output: 5402
src/uikit/Layout.tsx (1)
19-21: Verify image configuration setup.
The AI summary mentions new image handling configuration in next.config.js for placehold.co. Let's verify this setup is properly configured for the background images used here.
✅ Verification successful
Background image configuration is properly set up
The verification shows that:
- The
next.config.jshas proper image configuration forplacehold.co - The Layout component correctly handles background images via the
bgImageprop - Background images are properly used in landing page and room search with local SVG files from
/assets/images/ - The TODO comment about changing position to 'right' is a separate styling concern and doesn't affect the image configuration
The current setup is working as expected for both remote images (via next.config.js) and local assets.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify next.config.js image configuration setup
# Check if next.config.js exists and contains image configuration
echo "Checking next.config.js for image configuration..."
rg -A 5 "images.*:" next.config.js
# Look for background image usage patterns
echo "Checking for background image usage patterns..."
rg "backgroundImage.*placehold\.co" src/
Length of output: 416
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the Layout.tsx file to understand the background image setup
echo "Checking Layout.tsx for background image configuration..."
cat src/uikit/Layout.tsx
# Let's also check for any other background image usages in the codebase
echo -e "\nChecking for background image related styles..."
rg "background.*:" -A 2 src/
# Check for image-related imports and configurations
echo -e "\nChecking for image-related imports..."
rg "import.*[iI]mage" src/
Length of output: 3083
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check how the Layout component is being used with bgImage prop
echo "Checking usage of Layout component with bgImage..."
rg -A 3 "Layout.*bgImage" src/
# Let's also check the pages directory to see how images are configured
echo -e "\nChecking pages directory for image configurations..."
rg "background.*image" src/pages/
Length of output: 1165
src/theme/index.ts (1)
38-38: LGTM with a minor suggestion.
The semi-transparent dark background color is appropriate for overlay effects. Consider using rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.4) instead of rgba(1, 1, 1, 0.4) for pure black, though the visual difference would be minimal.
Let's verify how this new theme color is being used:
✅ Verification successful
The dark background color is appropriately used and implemented
The color is being used in RoomCardItem component as a background color for a card layout, which is a suitable use case for a semi-transparent dark overlay. The theme also has a consistent structure with other background colors (like background.coffee), showing this is a well-organized addition.
While using rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.4) would be technically more accurate for pure black, the current implementation with rgba(1, 1, 1, 0.4) will have negligible visual difference and works well for its intended purpose.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check usage of the new dark background color in the codebase
# Expected: Find components using this theme color for overlays or dim effects
# Search for background references in tsx/jsx files
rg -t tsx -t jsx "background.*dark"
# Search for specific theme path usage
rg "background\.dark"
Length of output: 156
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the actual usage context in RoomCardItem.tsx
rg -B 5 -A 5 "background\.dark" src/modules/room/RoomCardItem.tsx
# Also check if there are any other background-related theme colors
cat src/theme/index.ts
Length of output: 1300
src/modules/room/roomService.ts (3)
5-5: LGTM: Clean type import for pagination.
The import is properly scoped using the 'type' keyword, following TypeScript best practices.
17-20: LGTM: Well-structured response type.
The type definition cleanly separates room data from pagination metadata, with proper use of optional properties.
26-26: Verify the impact of the return type change.
The function's return type has changed from Promise<Room[]> to Promise<SearchRoomResponse>, which could affect existing consumers.
✅ Verification successful
Return type change is safe to proceed
The change from Promise<Room[]> to Promise<SearchRoomResponse> is safe because:
- The only consumer (
roomHook.ts) uses the result throughuseQuerywithout any direct array operations - The new
SearchRoomResponsetype provides additional metadata while keeping the rooms array accessible via.roomsproperty - No other direct usages or array operations were found in the codebase
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for direct usage of searchRoom function to identify affected code
ast-grep --pattern 'searchRoom($$$)'
# Search for array operations on searchRoom results that might break
rg -l 'await searchRoom.*\.(map|filter|reduce|forEach|length)'
Length of output: 175
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the implementation of roomHook.ts to understand how the result is used
cat src/modules/room/roomHook.ts
# Also check for any type definitions related to SearchRoomResponse
fd SearchRoomResponse --exec cat {}
Length of output: 543
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the roomService.ts file to understand the SearchRoomResponse type
cat src/modules/room/roomService.ts
# Also search for any Room[] type usage in the codebase that might be affected
rg "Promise<Room\[\]>" -A 2 -B 2
Length of output: 1306
next.config.js (1)
26-35: Review the image configuration strategy
A few considerations about the current implementation:
-
Using
placehold.cosuggests this might be temporary. Consider:- Moving to a proper CDN/image hosting service for production
- Using environment-specific configurations
- Implementing proper image optimization and caching strategies
-
The pathname pattern
'/**'is very permissive. Consider restricting it to specific paths or sizes that your application actually needs.
Let's verify the actual image usage patterns:
public/locales/en/common.json (2)
22-29: LGTM! Well-structured localization entries.
The new search section is well-organized with clear, user-friendly messages that maintain consistency across desktop and mobile views.
25-25: Verify HTML tag handling in translations.
The translation string contains HTML tags (<b></b>). Please ensure your i18n library properly handles HTML tags in translations to prevent potential XSS vulnerabilities or rendering issues.
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information about how HTML tags are specifically handled in the codebase.
HTML tags in translations are safely handled using the Trans component
The codebase correctly handles HTML tags in translations using the Trans component from next-i18next, which safely interpolates HTML elements. Specifically for the found_rooms translation:
- The
<b>tag in the translation string is properly mapped to a<strong>element via the components prop - No dangerous HTML rendering methods (dangerouslySetInnerHTML) are used
- The implementation follows i18next's recommended practices for handling HTML in translations
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check i18n library configuration and usage for HTML tag handling
# Look for i18n configuration files
fd -e js -e ts -e json "i18n.config|next-i18next.config"
# Check how HTML tags are handled in components
rg -A 3 "useTranslation|Trans component"
Length of output: 2463
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for Trans component usage with HTML tags
rg -A 5 "<Trans"
# Check the i18next configuration
cat next-i18next.config.js
# Look for dangerouslySetInnerHTML usage which might be related to translation rendering
rg "dangerouslySetInnerHTML"
# Check for specific usage of the found_rooms translation key
rg "found_rooms"
Length of output: 1044
public/locales/id/common.json (1)
22-29: LGTM! Well-structured localization for search feature.
The translations are natural, complete, and properly formatted. The section includes all necessary UI elements with appropriate mobile/desktop variants.
src/modules/room/RoomCardItem.tsx (1)
1-16: LGTM! Well-organized imports with proper component selection.
The imports are logically grouped and all components are utilized effectively. Good choice using Next.js Image component for optimized image loading.
src/uikit/Header.tsx (2)
22-22: Verify custom Container component compatibility
The switch from Chakra UI's Container to a custom implementation might affect the header's layout behavior.
#!/bin/bash
# Check the custom Container implementation
ast-grep --pattern 'export const Container = ({ children }) => {
$$$
}'
# Check for any Container usages that might be affected
rg -l "from '@chakra-ui/react'" | xargs rg "Container"147-148: Review layout changes impact
The Container component's simplified props and removal of maxW constraints might affect the header's responsive behavior and maximum width limits. Additionally, the removal of horizontal padding (px) from the Flex component could impact content spacing.
Consider:
- Documenting the intended layout behavior
- Adding responsive width constraints if needed
- Ensuring consistent padding patterns across components
src/modules/room/RoomSearchContainer.tsx (1)
3-13: Imports are well-organized and necessary dependencies are included.
The imported modules are appropriate and improve the component's functionality.
| /* TODO: remove this hardcoded style if we want to activate dark mode */ | ||
| background-color: black !important; | ||
| color: white !important; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Avoid hardcoded colors and !important declarations for theme implementation
The current implementation has several concerns:
- Hardcoded colors prevent proper theme switching
- Using
!importantmakes styles difficult to override and maintain - TODO comment indicates this is a temporary solution
Consider implementing a proper theme system using CSS variables:
body {
- /* TODO: remove this hardcoded style if we want to activate dark mode */
- background-color: black !important;
- color: white !important;
+ background-color: var(--background-color);
+ color: var(--text-color);
}
+:root {
+ /* Light theme (default) */
+ --background-color: #ffffff;
+ --text-color: #000000;
+}
+
+[data-theme='dark'] {
+ --background-color: #000000;
+ --text-color: #ffffff;
+}This approach:
- Enables easy theme switching
- Maintains maintainable code
- Follows CSS best practices
- Removes the need for !important declarations
Consider using a CSS-in-JS solution or a dedicated theme management library like @emotion/styled or styled-components for better theme management across your React components.
Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
| <Text fontWeight={600} fontSize='20px'> | ||
| {room.name} | ||
| </Text> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Implement localization for text content.
Text content should be localized using your translation system for better internationalization support.
<Text fontWeight={600} fontSize='20px'>
- {room.name}
+ {t('room.name', { name: room.name })}
</Text>
// ...
-<Text fontWeight={400}>{room.totalChannel} Server Joined</Text>
+<Text fontWeight={400}>{t('room.serversJoined', { count: room.totalChannel })}</Text>
// ...
-<Text noOfLines={2}>{room.description}</Text>
+<Text noOfLines={2}>{t('room.description', { description: room.description })}</Text>Also applies to: 51-51, 87-87
| <Flex | ||
| flexDir='column' | ||
| borderRadius='16px' | ||
| p={4} | ||
| gap={4} | ||
| bgColor='background.dark'> | ||
| <Flex flexDir='row' gap={3}> | ||
| <Image | ||
| src='https://placehold.co/60x60.png' | ||
| width={60} | ||
| height={60} | ||
| alt='server' | ||
| style={{ borderRadius: '12px' }} | ||
| /> | ||
| <Flex flexDir='column' gap={1}> | ||
| <Text fontWeight={600} fontSize='20px'> | ||
| {room.name} | ||
| </Text> | ||
| <HStack spacing={3}> | ||
| <HStack spacing={1}> | ||
| <Icon as={StarIcon} fontSize='16px' /> | ||
| <Text fontWeight={400}>{room.rate}</Text> | ||
| </HStack> | ||
| <HStack spacing={1}> | ||
| <Icon as={ServerIcon} fontSize='16px' /> | ||
| <Text fontWeight={400}>{room.totalChannel} Server Joined</Text> | ||
| </HStack> | ||
| {room.tags.length > 0 && ( | ||
| <HStack spacing={3} display={{ base: 'none', md: 'flex' }}> | ||
| <Divider orientation='vertical' bgColor='white' /> | ||
| <HStack spacing={2}> | ||
| {room.tags.slice(0, MAX_TAG_SHOW_COUNT).map((tag) => ( | ||
| <Tag | ||
| key={tag} | ||
| fontSize='14px' | ||
| bgColor='rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.25)' | ||
| color='white'> | ||
| <TagLeftIcon as={HashtagIcon} mr={1} /> | ||
| <TagLabel>{tag}</TagLabel> | ||
| </Tag> | ||
| ))} | ||
| {room.tags.length > MAX_TAG_SHOW_COUNT && ( | ||
| <Tooltip | ||
| label={room.tags.slice(MAX_TAG_SHOW_COUNT).join(', ')}> | ||
| <Tag | ||
| fontSize='14px' | ||
| bgColor='rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.25)' | ||
| color='white' | ||
| cursor='pointer'> | ||
| <TagLabel> | ||
| +{room.tags.length - MAX_TAG_SHOW_COUNT} | ||
| </TagLabel> | ||
| </Tag> | ||
| </Tooltip> | ||
| )} | ||
| </HStack> | ||
| </HStack> | ||
| )} | ||
| </HStack> | ||
| </Flex> | ||
| </Flex> | ||
| <Text noOfLines={2}>{room.description}</Text> | ||
| </Flex> | ||
| ); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add error boundary and loading states.
The component should handle error cases and loading states gracefully.
Consider wrapping the component with an error boundary and adding loading states:
function RoomCardItemErrorFallback({ error, resetErrorBoundary }) {
return (
<Flex
flexDir='column'
borderRadius='16px'
p={4}
gap={4}
bgColor='background.dark'>
<Text>Error loading room: {error.message}</Text>
<Button onClick={resetErrorBoundary}>Retry</Button>
</Flex>
);
}
export function RoomCardItem({ room, isLoading }: Props & { isLoading?: boolean }) {
if (isLoading) {
return <RoomCardItemSkeleton />;
}
return (
<ErrorBoundary FallbackComponent={RoomCardItemErrorFallback}>
{/* existing component content */}
</ErrorBoundary>
);
}| <Image | ||
| src='https://placehold.co/60x60.png' | ||
| width={60} | ||
| height={60} | ||
| alt='server' | ||
| style={{ borderRadius: '12px' }} | ||
| /> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Replace hardcoded placeholder image with proper image handling.
The current implementation uses a hardcoded placeholder image URL and lacks proper error handling.
<Image
- src='https://placehold.co/60x60.png'
+ src={room.imageUrl ?? '/default-room-image.png'}
width={60}
height={60}
- alt='server'
+ alt={`${room.name} room image`}
+ onError={(e) => {
+ e.currentTarget.src = '/default-room-image.png';
+ }}
style={{ borderRadius: '12px' }}
/>Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
| <Container pt={6} minH='100vh'> | ||
| <HStack spacing={2} color='white'> | ||
| <Icon as={BackIcon} /> | ||
| <Text fontSize='14px'>Homepage</Text> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Localize the "Homepage" text for consistency.
The text "Homepage" should use the translation function t to support internationalization.
Apply this diff to localize the text:
- <Text fontSize='14px'>Homepage</Text>
+ <Text fontSize='14px'>{t('common:homepage')}</Text>Ensure the key common:homepage exists in your localization files.
Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
| {searchRoomQuery.data?.rooms.map((room) => ( | ||
| <RoomCardItem key={room.serial} room={room} /> | ||
| ))} | ||
| </Flex> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Safely handle potential undefined rooms to prevent runtime errors.
If searchRoomQuery.data or searchRoomQuery.data.rooms is undefined, calling .map on undefined will cause an error. Ensure that rooms is defined before mapping.
Apply this diff to safely handle undefined rooms:
- {searchRoomQuery.data?.rooms.map((room) => (
+ {searchRoomQuery.data?.rooms?.map((room) => (Alternatively, provide a default empty array:
- {searchRoomQuery.data?.rooms.map((room) => (
+ {(searchRoomQuery.data?.rooms ?? []).map((room) => (📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| {searchRoomQuery.data?.rooms.map((room) => ( | |
| <RoomCardItem key={room.serial} room={room} /> | |
| ))} | |
| </Flex> | |
| {searchRoomQuery.data?.rooms?.map((room) => ( | |
| <RoomCardItem key={room.serial} room={room} /> | |
| ))} | |
| </Flex> | |
| ``` | |
| Alternative suggestion using the nullish coalescing approach: | |
| ```suggestion | |
| {(searchRoomQuery.data?.rooms ?? []).map((room) => ( | |
| <RoomCardItem key={room.serial} room={room} /> | |
| ))} | |
| </Flex> |
|
Please add the alternative text if the room searched is empty so that we might be notified by the text @Fakhri1999 |
Screenshot/Screen Recording
Before This PR
After This PR
2024-11-14.23-23-05.mp4
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
placehold.co.RoomCardItemcomponent for displaying room details.RoomSearchContainerwith a responsive design and enhanced internationalization.Bug Fixes
Chores
Containercomponent for better layout management.