Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

сhore: update GH worklows + add various repo configs #2

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Dec 23, 2024

Conversation

gberenice
Copy link
Member

@gberenice gberenice commented Dec 23, 2024

Info

This adds :

  • basic MP configs for GH repo and workflows
  • CRabbit configs
  • Codeowners and PR template files

References

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Introduced a new configuration file for CodeRabbit integration with settings for language, tone, and review processes.
    • Added a new .github/CODEOWNERS file to specify code ownership.
    • Implemented a structured pull request template with sections for "what," "why," and "references."
    • Added two new GitHub Actions workflows: one for automated releases and another for monthly upgrades.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Updated markdownlint settings to ignore the first line heading requirement.
  • Updates

    • Upgraded various components and tools in the trunk configuration file.

@gberenice gberenice requested a review from a team December 23, 2024 18:31
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 23, 2024

Walkthrough

This pull request introduces several configuration and workflow files to enhance repository management and automation. The changes include a new CodeRabbit configuration, a CODEOWNERS file to define code ownership, a pull request template for standardized documentation, and two GitHub Actions workflows for release management and periodic trunk upgrades. Additionally, the trunk configuration and markdownlint settings have been updated with version bumps and minor rule adjustments.

Changes

File Change Summary
.coderabbit.yaml New configuration file with language, tone, early access, knowledge base, review, and tools settings
.github/CODEOWNERS Added default owner @masterpointio/masterpoint-internal for all repository files
.github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md New template with "what", "why", and "references" sections
.github/workflows/release-please.yaml New workflow for handling Terraform module releases
.github/workflows/trunk-upgrade.yaml Monthly scheduled workflow for trunk upgrades with manual trigger
.trunk/configs/.markdownlint.yaml Added MD041: false to ignore first line heading requirement
.trunk/trunk.yaml Multiple version upgrades for CLI, plugins, runtimes, and linting tools

Possibly related PRs

  • /terraform-spacelift-automation#6: Introduces similar .coderabbit.yaml configuration
  • /terraform-aws-ssm-agent#29: Contains comparable CodeRabbit configuration file

Poem

🤖 Configs dancing, workflows in sync,
Trunk upgrades humming, automation's link!
CODEOWNERS watching, PRs taking flight,
A repository's rhythm, polished and bright!
Code's poetry in motion, oh what a delight! 🚀


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 83331e5 and c303b31.

📒 Files selected for processing (7)
  • .coderabbit.yaml (1 hunks)
  • .github/CODEOWNERS (1 hunks)
  • .github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md (1 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/release-please.yaml (1 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/trunk-upgrade.yaml (1 hunks)
  • .trunk/configs/.markdownlint.yaml (1 hunks)
  • .trunk/trunk.yaml (1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (5)
  • .github/workflows/release-please.yaml
  • .github/CODEOWNERS
  • .trunk/configs/.markdownlint.yaml
  • .github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md
  • .coderabbit.yaml
🔇 Additional comments (5)
.github/workflows/trunk-upgrade.yaml (3)

1-7: LGTM! Well-structured workflow configuration.

The workflow name is descriptive and the scheduling is appropriate for monthly upgrades. The manual trigger option provides flexibility when needed.


9-17: LGTM! Follows security best practices.

The permissions are well-configured following the principle of least privilege:

  • Global read-only access by default
  • Specific write permissions only where needed for PR creation

19-28: Verify the action versions are up to date.

While using pinned commits is secure, let's ensure we're using the latest stable versions.

✅ Verification successful

Action versions are up to date

Both actions are using their latest stable releases:

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check latest releases for the actions
echo "Checking actions/checkout latest release:"
gh api repos/actions/checkout/releases/latest --jq .tag_name

echo "Checking tibdex/github-app-token latest release:"
gh api repos/tibdex/github-app-token/releases/latest --jq .tag_name

Length of output: 346

.trunk/trunk.yaml (2)

23-31: Review release notes for breaking changes.

Multiple linters have been updated to newer versions. While this is good for security and features, please ensure you've reviewed the release notes for any breaking changes, particularly for major version bumps in:

  • checkov (3.2.31 → 3.2.344)
  • trivy (0.49.1 → 0.58.0)
  • trufflehog (3.68.4 → 3.88.0)

Consider adding comments in the configuration file linking to the relevant release notes or explaining any breaking changes that required adjustments.


5-5: Verify version compatibility.

The CLI and plugin versions have been updated. Let's ensure they are compatible with each other.

Also applies to: 10-10

✅ Verification successful

Version update looks compatible

The CLI version 1.22.8 and plugin version v1.6.6 are from recent, stable releases. The configuration follows Trunk's recommended structure with all components properly aligned. The version combination is commonly used and should work well together.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check Trunk's compatibility matrix
curl -s https://docs.trunk.io/compatibility-matrix || echo "Unable to fetch compatibility matrix"

Length of output: 73926


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check trunk.yaml for plugin versions
cat .trunk/trunk.yaml

# Check if there's a compatibility matrix in the repo
fd -t f -e md -e txt compatibility

Length of output: 1182

.github/workflows/trunk-upgrade.yaml Show resolved Hide resolved
.trunk/trunk.yaml Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link

@oycyc oycyc left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, good maintenance!

@gberenice gberenice merged commit abc93e6 into main Dec 23, 2024
2 checks passed
@gberenice gberenice deleted the chore/update-gh-worklows branch December 23, 2024 18:47
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants