Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore(ci): use common renovate bot configuration. #445

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 15, 2025

Conversation

jvanz
Copy link
Member

@jvanz jvanz commented Jan 14, 2025

Description

Updates the renovate bot configuration to uses the default configuration used by all the major Kubewarden components.

Updates the renovate bot configuration to uses the default configuration
used by all the major Kubewarden components.

Signed-off-by: José Guilherme Vanz <[email protected]>
@jvanz jvanz self-assigned this Jan 14, 2025
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 14, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 69.85%. Comparing base (eb1a168) to head (60bb84f).
Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #445   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   69.85%   69.85%           
=======================================
  Files          11       11           
  Lines        1506     1506           
=======================================
  Hits         1052     1052           
  Misses        381      381           
  Partials       73       73           
Flag Coverage Δ
unit-tests 69.85% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@jvanz jvanz marked this pull request as ready for review January 15, 2025 12:37
@jvanz jvanz requested a review from a team as a code owner January 15, 2025 12:37
@flavio flavio merged commit 7e79528 into kubewarden:main Jan 15, 2025
7 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
Archived in project
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants