Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Mitigate https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/96635 in load test #1822

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 7, 2021

Conversation

mborsz
Copy link
Member

@mborsz mborsz commented Jun 7, 2021

Mitigates kubernetes/kubernetes#96635 in load test.

Currently if the following scenario happens:

With this mitigation, we delete configmaps/secrets only when we already know that all pod using that pod have been deleted.

Ref #1575
/assign @jkaniuk

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. label Jun 7, 2021
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. labels Jun 7, 2021
@@ -130,6 +138,16 @@ steps:
- basename: daemonset-priorityclass
objectTemplatePath: daemonset-priorityclass.yaml

- module:
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can we add a TODO (and open an issue) to merge back those sections once the bug in upstream will be fixed?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Added

Copy link
Contributor

@jkaniuk jkaniuk Jun 7, 2021

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

nit: "remove once k/k bug is fixed"?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Fixed PTAL

@jkaniuk
Copy link
Contributor

jkaniuk commented Jun 7, 2021

/lgtm
/hold on one comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. labels Jun 7, 2021
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jun 7, 2021
@jkaniuk
Copy link
Contributor

jkaniuk commented Jun 7, 2021

/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jun 7, 2021
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: jkaniuk, mborsz

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@mborsz
Copy link
Member Author

mborsz commented Jun 7, 2021

/hold cancel

The comment has been addressed

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Jun 7, 2021
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit d15b55a into kubernetes:master Jun 7, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants