Use strings.Builder for v.String() #8
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
kke
force-pushed
the
string-memleak
branch
2 times, most recently
from
84e1f87
to
9e7f98e
Compare
Signed-off-by: Kimmo Lehto <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Kimmo Lehto <[email protected]>
|
After looking at it again, I don't think there's any "leak" upstream, it just allocates a string that needs to be garbage collected. This fork makes the problem way worse by doing a LOT of Sorting a long list will allocate a gazillion strings. |
|
Doesn't make it better. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
As mentioned in a go-version issue upstream, calling
v.String()leaks memory.This is an attempt to fix that for k0sproject/version.