Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(form): 真机中小程序环境下的星号无法对齐 #2936

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: next
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

oasis-cloud
Copy link
Collaborator

@oasis-cloud oasis-cloud commented Jan 13, 2025

🤔 这个变动的性质是?

  • 日常 bug 修复

🔗 相关 Issue

💡 需求背景和解决方案

☑️ 请求合并前的自查清单

⚠️ 请自检并全部勾选全部选项⚠️

  • 文档已补充或无须补充
  • 代码演示已提供或无须提供
  • TypeScript 定义已补充或无须补充
  • fork仓库代码是否为最新避免文件冲突
  • Files changed 没有 package.json lock 等无关文件

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • 样式调整
    • 修改了表单项标签中必填项标记的垂直定位,确保其精确对齐到容器顶部。

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 13, 2025

变更概述

演练

此次变更涉及在 src/packages/formitem/formitem.scss 文件中的 .nut-form-item-label-required 类添加 top: 0; 样式声明。这一修改调整了必填标签的垂直定位,确保其在包含元素的顶部对齐。变更仅针对样式定位,未对表单项的整体结构产生重大影响。

变更

文件路径 变更说明
src/packages/formitem/formitem.scss .nut-form-item-label-required 类中添加 top: 0; 样式

可能相关的 PR

建议标签

2.x

建议审阅者

  • xiaoyatong
  • irisSong

诗歌庆祝

小兔子跳呀跳,
样式调整真巧妙,
标签对齐顶部行,
表单美得不得了!
🐰✨


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 2571c8d and f4f5315.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/packages/formitem/formitem.scss (1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
  • GitHub Check: build
🔇 Additional comments (1)
src/packages/formitem/formitem.scss (1)

27-27: 修复必填星号的对齐问题,代码变更合理!

添加 top: 0 确保了必填星号在小程序真机环境下能够正确对齐,这是一个简单而有效的修复。

建议在以下场景进行验证:

  • 不同尺寸的手机设备
  • 表单项为多行时的对齐效果
  • 不同表单布局(上对齐、左对齐、右对齐)下的显示效果
✅ Verification successful

样式修改已验证安全可靠!

经过仔细验证,添加 top: 0 的修改是安全的:

  • 该修改不会影响表单项的其他布局模式(左对齐、右对齐、顶部对齐)
  • 与 RTL(从右到左)布局兼容
  • 不会干扰表单组件的其他定位样式
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# 检查是否有其他依赖此样式类的组件
rg -l "nut-form-item-label-required"

Length of output: 153


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check implementation details
echo "=== formitem.tsx ==="
ast-grep --pattern 'className="nut-form-item-label-required"' 
echo "=== formitem.taro.tsx ==="
ast-grep --pattern 'className="nut-form-item-label-required"'
echo "=== Related styles ==="
rg "nut-form-item-label" -A 2 src/packages/formitem/formitem.scss

Length of output: 1200


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the 2.x label Jan 13, 2025
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 13, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 84.02%. Comparing base (2571c8d) to head (f4f5315).

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             next    #2936   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   84.02%   84.02%           
=======================================
  Files         220      220           
  Lines       17917    17917           
  Branches     2628     2628           
=======================================
  Hits        15055    15055           
  Misses       2857     2857           
  Partials        5        5           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant