-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 298
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Feature/bukuserver test cache #661
Feature/bukuserver test cache #661
Conversation
- test recording - use exact file - record of network test
…The google search test is passing on my machine in this branch, for all Python versions. Though there's two tests (
The current master didn't pass testing due to this test failing once (due to Google server DDoS detection)… and the same exact thing happened to my latest pull request 😂 |
probably not, but the target for now just to make upstream test working again
i think this happen several time and the test have to to be manually restarted. so this should be never happen again |
Oh, right; there was such a feature on Github. …I don't think I have access for that tho 😅 |
Thank you! |
…An important note: this change isn't applied by tox correctly in a pre-existing repo clone until you delete the |
I don't understand. We don't have any |
Of course we don't – it's listed in It's the local files created by tox on the first run (I think). |
I have added a cooking section in the ToDo list now: #484 Can you please add this note there? |
You mean editing your comment? Or posting a new comment in the issue discussion? |
Please share what should the note be here. |
"If you have a local repo clone, remove |
related #442
@jarun you hesitate to add new files to repo but this yaml recordings are important for test consistency.
@LeXofLeviafan mention that he also have diffculty on getting the same result #632
it doesnt mean direct network test is not possible or not needed but it is not the default
i think this test also failing several times, so maybe it is time to cache it
last thing, i added @LeXofLeviafan as reviewer. if you still have error on test i will change it