Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Allow doc creation with initial content #330

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

michaelsilver
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

Copy link

vercel bot commented Nov 7, 2024

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
y-sweet-debugger ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Nov 7, 2024 1:43am
y-sweet-demos ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Nov 7, 2024 1:43am
y-sweet-gendocs ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Nov 7, 2024 1:43am

Copy link

@standard-input standard-input bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

No issues flagged.
Standard Input can make mistakes. Check important info.

Copy link

@standard-input standard-input bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

No issues flagged.
Standard Input can make mistakes. Check important info.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 7, 2024

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces a new method called createDocWithContent within the DocumentManager class located in js-pkg/sdk/src/main.ts. This method facilitates the creation of a document initialized with content in the form of a Yjs update byte string. It operates by first invoking the createDoc method to generate a new document without an ID, followed by updating this document with the provided content using the updateDoc method. The method returns a DocCreationResult object that includes the ID of the newly created document.

In addition to the class method, a new exported function, also named createDocWithContent, is introduced outside the class. This function acts as a convenience wrapper around the class method, accepting a connection string and a Yjs update byte string as parameters, and similarly returns a DocCreationResult object.

The changes do not affect any existing methods or the error handling logic, maintaining the overall control flow consistent with previous implementations.


🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
js-pkg/sdk/src/main.ts (1)

203-217: LGTM! Consider adding parameter validation.

The implementation follows the established pattern of wrapper functions in the codebase. While not critical, consider adding validation for the connectionString parameter to fail fast on invalid inputs.

Example validation:

export async function createDocWithContent(
  connectionString: string,
  update: Uint8Array,
): Promise<DocCreationResult> {
+  if (!connectionString.startsWith('ys://') && !connectionString.startsWith('yss://')) {
+    throw new Error('Invalid connection string format. Must start with ys:// or yss://')
+  }
  const manager = new DocumentManager(connectionString)
  return await manager.createDocWithContent(update)
}
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between a6807f7 and 07410c4.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • js-pkg/sdk/src/main.ts (2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
js-pkg/sdk/src/main.ts (1)

139-144: LGTM! Well-documented method.

The JSDoc comments clearly describe the purpose, parameters, and return value of the method.

Comment on lines +145 to +149
public async createDocWithContent(update: Uint8Array): Promise<DocCreationResult> {
const result = await this.createDoc()
await this.updateDoc(result.docId, update)
return result
}
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Add error handling for the update operation.

The current implementation could leave the document in an inconsistent state if the update operation fails after creation. Consider wrapping the operations in a try-catch block and implementing cleanup on failure.

Here's a suggested implementation:

  public async createDocWithContent(update: Uint8Array): Promise<DocCreationResult> {
    const result = await this.createDoc()
+   try {
      await this.updateDoc(result.docId, update)
      return result
+   } catch (error) {
+     // TODO: Implement cleanup of the created document
+     throw new Error(`Failed to initialize document content: ${error.message}`)
+   }
  }

Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant