Feat/sim ln integration

[kelvinator07]

Closes #829

Replaces #868

Description

This PR implements SimLN into Polar.

SimLN is a simulation tool that can be used to generate realistic payment activity on any lightning network topology. It is intentionally environment-agnostic so that it can be used across many environments - from integration tests to public signets.

Polar provides a set of node configurations and payment activities (such as amount and frequency) to SimLN, which facilitates ongoing payments between the nodes.

To ensure successful payments, there must be an existing channel established between the nodes.

Steps to Test

1. Create a new network with 2 LND nodes (Currently supports only LND while CLN is WIP)
2. Start the network
3. Open a channel between the 2 LND nodes
4. Click on the Activity Designer menu
5. Click on the Arrow beside Add Activities
6. Select Source and Destination nodes
7. Click on the START button
8. View docker logs for payment activities between nodes

Screenshots

[kelvinator07]

@Abdulkbk FYI

[jamaljsr]

@kelvinator07 Thanks for working on this. I've played with it a bit and just have a little feedback so far on the UX considering the full functionality is not completed yet.

1. The flow of having to hit the arrow to show the "Add Activity" form isn't intuitive in my opinion. That should stand out a bit more, maybe by using a plus icon. Instead of having the form displayed in the sidebar, I would suggest opening a modal to add/edit an activity. The existing litd LNC Sessions UX comes to mind.
   
2. The Start button design isn't consistent with all of the other buttons throughout that app. This should use the primary button look and feel. Also, remember to check the UI in light mode.
   
3. I was able to add an activity while simln was already running. It didn't update the currently running activities. Should we prevent users from doing this?
4. When stopping the whole network, the simln container doesn't stop gracefully. Docker has to kill it after the 30sec timeout. Is there a way to fix this so users don't have to wait 30secs every time they stop the network?
5. This is minor but I don't think the tab label "Activity Designer" matches what this section actually does. I'd call it "Simulations".

I'm sure I'll have more feedback as this PR progresses but that's what stood out to me on my first pass.

[kelvinator07]

@jamaljsr Thanks for your feedback. I'll update and revert.

[michaelWuensch]

Is this still being developed? Would be super awesome to have that feature!

[kelvinator07]

Hi @michaelWuensch,
Yes, this is still being developed. However, @Abdulkbk will be taking over the work moving forward.

[kelvinator07]

Hi @Abdulkbk,

I’ve pushed my local changes addressing @jamaljsr’s comments and suggestions.
I’ve also added some TODOs for the remaining tasks to be implemented.

Feel free to reach out if you have any questions or need clarification.

[Abdulkbk]

Hi @Abdulkbk,

I’ve pushed my local changes addressing @jamaljsr’s comments and suggestions.

I’ve also added some TODOs for the remaining tasks to be implemented.

Feel free to reach out if you have any questions or need clarification.

Great work @kelvinator07, I will reach out when I have any questions.