Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Solving ifort/IFX runtime issues #101

Draft
wants to merge 3 commits into
base: dev
Choose a base branch
from
Draft

Solving ifort/IFX runtime issues #101

wants to merge 3 commits into from

Conversation

fedebenelli
Copy link
Member

When compiling with ifx and ifort there is a problem (at least on my PC, since it seems to work ok over Github CI) when tracing phase envelopes. Where the passed function foo from the pt_envelope_2ph function to the continuation function provides a wrong reference.

@fedebenelli fedebenelli marked this pull request as draft July 30, 2024 12:15
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jul 30, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 93.37%. Comparing base (904405a) to head (09a6def).

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##              dev     #101      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   93.41%   93.37%   -0.04%     
==========================================
  Files          57       57              
  Lines        2686     2688       +2     
  Branches      194      194              
==========================================
+ Hits         2509     2510       +1     
- Misses        127      128       +1     
  Partials       50       50              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@fedebenelli
Copy link
Member Author

As it was seen on the optimization API changes, it seems that ifx does not behave well when passing a procedure that was defined inside another procedure

subroutine foo(x, y)
    call hoo(goo, x, y)
contains
    subroutine goo(x, y)
    end subroutine
end subroutine

Maybe there is some kind of relation here

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant