[Concept] Drop reduntant model param

[JakNowy]

The idea is that if you use EndpointCreator, the model is passed twice: once to the corresponding FastCRUD and another time class itself. As the model is already required in FastCRUD, it should picked from there.

This is a breaking change if somebody didn't pass explicit crud, but EndpointCreator(crud=FastCRUD(MyModel)) or EndpointCreator(crud=MyFastCRUD(MyModel)) looks a clean and consistent approach.

What are your thoughts? @igorbenav

[igorbenav]

Since passing a CRUD class is optional, I don't think this is relevant

[JakNowy]

Since passing a CRUD class is optional, I don't think this is relevant

That's a fair point, from perspective of somebody who uses generic crud endpoint. But making a CRUD required parameter of the endpoint would unify the approach in case you want to extend the router logic.

[igorbenav]

Now that I thought more about it, I think this is good. Specially because we could add a check that the crud's model is the same as the passed model if both are passed

[JakNowy]

Yep that works too! Currently it's a bit inconsistent.