Add Fuel cycle benchmarking #234
Draft
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Job Documentation, step Sync to remote on 115279d wanted to post the following: View the site here This comment will be updated on new commits. |
|
This new capability does not relate to the V&V cases, so you should use a different issue from #12. |
|
One more thing: I think these capabilities should also be added as an example case along the existing fuel cycle. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Refs #12
Reason
Benchmarking between TMAP8 and the latest fuel cycle model is missing
Design
Add fuel cycle benchmarking from the latest fuel cycle paper by Meschini et al. (2023)
Impact
Provide more information for users on how to create a fuel cycle model using TMAP8