-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 359
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
weekly rule DST issue #551
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
Hi @larskuhnt, Thank you for your contribution ... this looks great! Just a couple of comments, but otherwise looks spot on. 👍🏻 |
Don't worry about fixing the linting issues ... that is resolved on #552 which I'll merge first. I'm just waiting on @seejohnrun updating my access so I can actually fix things. |
Hi @pacso, |
@larskuhnt - could you please pull |
@pacso I merged |
@larskuhnt - Could you resolve the linting errors? |
@pacso all checks pass now |
Amazing, thank you! I'll do a proper review either at lunch or after work and get this merged in 👍🏻 |
realigned_time = time.to_time | ||
# when the realigned time is in a different hour, it means that | ||
# time falls to the DST switch timespan. In this case, we need to | ||
# move the time back by one day to ensure that the hour stays the same | ||
# WARNING: this could not work if the DST change is on a monday | ||
# as the realigned time would be moved to the previous week. | ||
if realigned_time.hour != start_time.hour | ||
time.add(:day, -1) | ||
realigned_time = time.to_time | ||
end |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We need to add some tests to cover the edge case you've described.
Also, what happens if the threshold for DST isn't -1
days back?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This case can only happen when the realigned time changed the hour in the internals of Time
because of a DST change, so -1 day will always be a time which does not fall into the DST change time imho.
I also see that this is not the ideal solution, it would be better to somehow "fix" the hour to the start time hour of the schedule somewhere in ValidatedRule#next_time
but I did not find a way to access the start time of the schedule in ValidatedRule
. Maybe you have an idea to that approach.
Regarding the edge case: that was just a guess based on the documentation for the message. I don't really understand the described edge case and thought that the movement to the previous day could somehow trigger that case again.
Hi,
I added some specs for the following edge case where the calculation of the next occurrences returns faulty values.
The base of this issue is
IceCube::WeeklyRule.realign
when an occurrence happens within a DST time switch. For example on26th April 2024 00:00
->01:00
. Realign will change the start_time of e.g.22th May 2022 00:20
to26th April 2024 01:20
and then the starting hour is wrong. The result is occurrences with the time01:20
instead of00:20
.Thanks
Lars