Issue1880 mover efficiency fix and validation rework

[hcasperfu]

This closes #1880.

[mwetter]

See inline comment for missing revision note. Otherwise it looks good (but the CI tests fail which needs to be corrected).

[hcasperfu]

@mwetter - This PR is ready for review.
I obsoleted Movers.Validation.{PowerExact,PowerEuler,PowerSimplified} and made Movers.Validation.{ComparePowerHydraulic,ComparePowerInput,ComparePowerTotal}.

• ComparePowerHydraulic validates that $\eta = \eta_{hyd} \cdot \eta_{mot}$ under per.powerOrEfficiencyIsHydraulic=true.
• ComparePowerTotal validates the above under per.powerOrEfficiencyIsHydraulic=true.
• ComparePowerInput shows that the mover models with different inputs produce the same power estimation results.

I will work on a concurrent PR with Buildings.
Once you approve I will request an external review.

[hcasperfu]

In a70a9f5:

• The redeclarations in the validation models were rewritten to address an Optimica warning message.
• The changes caused the models to fail OpenModelica translation. OpenModelica fixed this glitch in Buildings models fail to translate after modifying redeclarations OpenModelica/OpenModelica#12484. These models are excluded in CI for now.

[Mathadon]

@hcasperfu this looks okay, thanks!

[mwetter]

This is ready to merge when the CI tests pass.