Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update bancos.json - Remove BRK url - brk.com.br #629

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 18, 2025

Conversation

guibranco
Copy link
Owner

@guibranco guibranco commented Jan 18, 2025

User description

📑 Description

Update bancos.json - Remove BRK url - brk.com.br

✅ Checks

  • My pull request adheres to the code style of this project
  • My code requires changes to the documentation
  • I have updated the documentation as required
  • All the tests have passed

☢️ Does this introduce a breaking change?

  • Yes
  • No


Description

  • Removed the URL for BRK from bancos.json, ensuring it is set to null.
  • This change improves data integrity by eliminating outdated or incorrect URLs.

Changes walkthrough 📝

Relevant files
Enhancement
bancos.json
Update bancos.json to Remove BRK URL                                         

data/bancos.json

  • Removed the URL for BRK from the bancos.json file.
  • Updated the structure to ensure no URL is present for BRK.
  • +2/-2     

    💡 Penify usage:
    Comment /help on the PR to get a list of all available Penify tools and their descriptions

    Description by Korbit AI

    What change is being made?

    Remove the BRK bank's URL (https://brk.com.br/) from the bancos.json file.

    Why are these changes being made?

    The URL for BRK bank is being set to null likely because it is no longer valid or relevant, ensuring the accuracy and integrity of the data file. This change is necessary to avoid potential misinformation or errors due to outdated or incorrect URL data.

    Is this description stale? Ask me to generate a new description by commenting /korbit-generate-pr-description

    Summary by CodeRabbit

    • New Features

      • Added a new bank: BRK S.A. Crédito, Financiamento e Investimento
    • Chores

      • Updated date information for multiple existing banks in the database

    @guibranco guibranco linked an issue Jan 18, 2025 that may be closed by this pull request
    Copy link

    sourcery-ai bot commented Jan 18, 2025

    Reviewer's Guide by Sourcery

    This pull request removes the BRK URL from the bancos.json file.

    No diagrams generated as the changes look simple and do not need a visual representation.

    File-Level Changes

    Change Details Files
    Removed the BRK URL from the bancos.json file.
    • Removed the 'brk.com.br' URL from the list of URLs in the bancos.json file
    data/bancos.json

    Tips and commands

    Interacting with Sourcery

    • Trigger a new review: Comment @sourcery-ai review on the pull request.
    • Continue discussions: Reply directly to Sourcery's review comments.
    • Generate a GitHub issue from a review comment: Ask Sourcery to create an
      issue from a review comment by replying to it.
    • Generate a pull request title: Write @sourcery-ai anywhere in the pull
      request title to generate a title at any time.
    • Generate a pull request summary: Write @sourcery-ai summary anywhere in
      the pull request body to generate a PR summary at any time. You can also use
      this command to specify where the summary should be inserted.

    Customizing Your Experience

    Access your dashboard to:

    • Enable or disable review features such as the Sourcery-generated pull request
      summary, the reviewer's guide, and others.
    • Change the review language.
    • Add, remove or edit custom review instructions.
    • Adjust other review settings.

    Getting Help

    @gstraccini gstraccini bot added ☑️ auto-merge Automatic merging of pull requests (gstraccini-bot) hacktoberfest Participation in the Hacktoberfest event 🐛 bug Issues related to bugs or errors 🔗 link checker Link checker report 🚦 awaiting triage Items that are awaiting triage or categorization labels Jan 18, 2025
    @penify-dev penify-dev bot added the enhancement A enhancement to the project label Jan 18, 2025
    @github-actions github-actions bot added the size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. label Jan 18, 2025
    @guibranco guibranco removed the 🚦 awaiting triage Items that are awaiting triage or categorization label Jan 18, 2025
    Copy link

    @korbit-ai korbit-ai bot left a comment

    Choose a reason for hiding this comment

    The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

    I've completed my review and didn't find any issues.

    Need a new review? Comment /korbit-review on this PR and I'll review your latest changes.

    Korbit Guide: Usage and Customization

    Interacting with Korbit

    • You can manually ask Korbit to review your PR using the /korbit-review command in a comment at the root of your PR.
    • You can ask Korbit to generate a new PR description using the /korbit-generate-pr-description command in any comment on your PR.
    • Too many Korbit comments? I can resolve all my comment threads if you use the /korbit-resolve command in any comment on your PR.
    • Chat with Korbit on issues we post by tagging @korbit-ai in your reply.
    • Help train Korbit to improve your reviews by giving a 👍 or 👎 on the comments Korbit posts.

    Customizing Korbit

    • Check out our docs on how you can make Korbit work best for you and your team.
    • Customize Korbit for your organization through the Korbit Console.

    Current Korbit Configuration

    General Settings
    Setting Value
    Review Schedule Automatic excluding drafts
    Max Issue Count 10
    Automatic PR Descriptions
    Issue Categories
    Category Enabled
    Naming
    Database Operations
    Documentation
    Logging
    Error Handling
    Systems and Environment
    Objects and Data Structures
    Readability and Maintainability
    Asynchronous Processing
    Design Patterns
    Third-Party Libraries
    Performance
    Security
    Functionality

    Feedback and Support

    Note

    Korbit Pro is free for open source projects 🎉

    Looking to add Korbit to your team? Get started with a free 2 week trial here

    @gstraccini gstraccini bot added the 🚦 awaiting triage Items that are awaiting triage or categorization label Jan 18, 2025
    Copy link

    @sourcery-ai sourcery-ai bot left a comment

    Choose a reason for hiding this comment

    The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

    Hey @guibranco - I've reviewed your changes - here's some feedback:

    Overall Comments:

    • The diff appears to be empty or incomplete. Please provide the complete changes being made to bancos.json.
    • You've indicated documentation changes were made, but these aren't visible in the PR. Please include all relevant documentation updates.
    Here's what I looked at during the review
    • 🟢 General issues: all looks good
    • 🟢 Security: all looks good
    • 🟢 Testing: all looks good
    • 🟢 Complexity: all looks good
    • 🟢 Documentation: all looks good

    Sourcery is free for open source - if you like our reviews please consider sharing them ✨
    Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment and I'll use the feedback to improve your reviews.

    Copy link
    Contributor

    penify-dev bot commented Jan 18, 2025

    PR Review 🔍

    ⏱️ Estimated effort to review [1-5]

    1, because the changes are straightforward and involve a simple update to a JSON file.

    🧪 Relevant tests

    No

    ⚡ Possible issues

    No

    🔒 Security concerns

    No

    @guibranco guibranco removed hacktoberfest Participation in the Hacktoberfest event Review effort [1-5]: 1 labels Jan 18, 2025
    Copy link

    coderabbitai bot commented Jan 18, 2025

    Warning

    Rate limit exceeded

    @gstraccini[bot] has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 4 minutes and 23 seconds before requesting another review.

    ⌛ How to resolve this issue?

    After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

    We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

    🚦 How do rate limits work?

    CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

    Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

    Please see our FAQ for further information.

    📥 Commits

    Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between e131df2 and 2ad6a2d.

    📒 Files selected for processing (1)
    • data/bancos.json (2 hunks)

    Walkthrough

    The pull request involves updates to the data/bancos.json file, which contains information about banks. The changes include updating the DateUpdated field for multiple existing banks and adding a new bank entry for "BRK S.A. Crédito, Financiamento e Investimento" with its associated details.

    Changes

    File Change Summary
    data/bancos.json - Added new bank: "BRK S.A. Crédito, Financiamento e Investimento"
    - Updated DateUpdated field for several existing bank entries

    Poem

    🐰 Hop, hop, through the banking lane,
    New data, fresh and bright again!
    BRK joins the financial dance,
    With dates updated at a glance.
    A rabbit's ledger, crisp and clean! 📊


    🪧 Tips

    Chat

    There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

    • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
      • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
      • Generate unit testing code for this file.
      • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
    • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
      • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
      • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
    • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
      • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
      • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
      • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
      • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

    Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

    CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

    • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
    • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
    • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
    • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
    • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
    • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
    • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
    • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
    • @coderabbitai help to get help.

    Other keywords and placeholders

    • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
    • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
    • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

    CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

    • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
    • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
    • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

    Documentation and Community

    • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
    • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
    • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

    @gstraccini gstraccini bot added the hacktoberfest Participation in the Hacktoberfest event label Jan 18, 2025
    Copy link
    Contributor

    Infisical secrets check: ✅ No secrets leaked!

    💻 Scan logs
    11:50PM INF scanning for exposed secrets...
    11:50PM INF 1093 commits scanned.
    11:50PM INF scan completed in 2.61s
    11:50PM INF no leaks found
    

    Copy link
    Contributor

    Summary

    Status Count
    🔍 Total 455
    ✅ Successful 234
    ⏳ Timeouts 0
    🔀 Redirected 0
    👻 Excluded 220
    ❓ Unknown 0
    🚫 Errors 1

    Errors per input

    Errors in ./data/bancos.md

    Copy link
    Contributor

    penify-dev bot commented Jan 18, 2025

    PR Code Suggestions ✨

    CategorySuggestion                                                                                                                                    Score
    Data integrity
    Remove the "Url" field instead of setting it to null

    Consider removing the "Url" field entirely instead of setting it to null, as it was
    previously holding a URL that is no longer valid.

    data/bancos.json [200]

    -"Url": null,
    +// "Url" field removed
     
    Suggestion importance[1-10]: 8

    Why: The suggestion addresses data integrity by recommending the removal of a field that previously held an invalid URL, which is a significant improvement.

    8
    Check the relevance of date fields after the URL removal

    Review the context of the "DateRegistered" and "DateUpdated" fields to ensure they are
    still relevant and accurate after the removal of the "Url" field.

    data/bancos.json [202]

    +"DateRegistered": "2021-05-05T09:11:12.7114795-03:00",
     
    -
    Suggestion importance[1-10]: 4

    Why: This suggestion is relevant but lacks specificity; it does not highlight any immediate issues or changes that need to be made.

    4
    Documentation
    Document the reason for the removal of the "Url" field

    Consider adding a comment or documentation regarding the removal of the "Url" field for
    future reference.

    data/bancos.json [200]

    -// "Url" field removed
    +// "Url" field removed - previously held an invalid URL
     
    Suggestion importance[1-10]: 6

    Why: Documenting changes is a good practice, and this suggestion helps maintain clarity in the codebase, though it is not critical.

    6
    Validation
    Validate the JSON structure for integrity after modifications

    Ensure that the JSON structure remains valid after the removal of the "Url" field by
    checking for any potential issues with the surrounding fields.

    data/bancos.json [201]

    +"DateOperationStarted": "2010-07-01",
     
    -
    Suggestion importance[1-10]: 5

    Why: While ensuring JSON validity is important, the suggestion is somewhat generic and does not directly address a specific issue in the code diff.

    5

    @guibranco guibranco merged commit 62e531a into main Jan 18, 2025
    32 of 36 checks passed
    @guibranco guibranco deleted the 628-link-checker-report branch January 18, 2025 23:52
    Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
    Labels
    ☑️ auto-merge Automatic merging of pull requests (gstraccini-bot) 🚦 awaiting triage Items that are awaiting triage or categorization 🐛 bug Issues related to bugs or errors enhancement A enhancement to the project hacktoberfest Participation in the Hacktoberfest event 🔗 link checker Link checker report size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files.
    Projects
    None yet
    Development

    Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

    🔗✅ Link checker report
    1 participant