Improve url form validation #117
Conversation
…n be validated separately
|
In the "after" view it wasn't immediately clear to me which problem pertained to which URL, and I think it might be worse for red/green colourblind users. Maybe put a divider line between each URL field, so that any problem reporting appears adjacent to the URL it pertains to, with a line between that text and the following URL? |
How about this? Can make the line more obvious.... |
|
Tiny bit wider! |
|
Oh, while you're tweaking this text can you use "URL" rather than "Url"? In both the widget label and on the Add Url button |
What does this change?
It would be helpful to perform some client side validation on urls being added to the upload form so that we can, e.g. prevent people submitting invalid urls, or urls to youtube search results (as yt-dlp will then try download everything on the page).
This PR introduces this, by breaking up the existing 'textarea' into individual input elements, as suggested by @zekehuntergreen ages ago.
Before:
After:
How to test
You can run just the API and the client locally to test this - though hopefully screenshots make it fairly clear what's going on. I've not tested on CODE yet as I'm waiting for #115 to go out.