📚 Doc: Clarify SendFile Docs #3172
Conversation
xEricL
requested review from
gaby,
sixcolors,
ReneWerner87 and
efectn
and removed request for
a team
WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request involve updates primarily focused on improving documentation across several files in the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Poem
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI ⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
🧰 Additional context used🔇 Additional comments (5)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #3172 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 82.36% 82.09% -0.28%
==========================================
Files 113 113
Lines 8474 11012 +2538
==========================================
+ Hits 6980 9040 +2060
- Misses 1089 1567 +478
Partials 405 405
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
router.go (2)
55-55: Approved: Improved consistency in documentationThe change from "Case sensitive param keys" to "Case-sensitive param keys" improves the consistency and correctness of the documentation. This aligns well with the PR objectives of fixing typos and improving clarity.
319-319: Approved: Improved clarity and consistency in commentThe change from "in-case sensitive" to "in case-sensitive" improves the grammatical correctness and consistency of the comment. This aligns well with the PR objectives of improving clarity and fixing typos.
For even better clarity, consider rephrasing the comment as follows:
// Create a stripped path for case-sensitive routing and trailing slash handlingThis suggestion more explicitly states the purpose of the stripped path creation.
ctx.go (1)
1500-1503: Approved: Documentation improvements for SendFile methodThe updates to the SendFile method's documentation are clear and helpful. They address the PR objectives by clarifying that:
- The file is not compressed by default.
- The Content-Type is set based on the file format.
These changes improve the clarity of the documentation and should help users better understand the behavior of the SendFile method.
Consider adding a brief example of how to enable compression, as this might be useful for users who want to use this feature. For instance:
// To enable compression: err := c.SendFile(file, SendFile{Compress: true})
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (6)
- app.go (1 hunks)
- app_test.go (1 hunks)
- ctx.go (2 hunks)
- ctx_interface_gen.go (1 hunks)
- docs/api/ctx.md (5 hunks)
- router.go (2 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- app.go
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (4)
router.go (1)
Line range hint
1-479: Overall assessment: Documentation improvementsThe changes in this file are focused on improving the clarity and consistency of the documentation, specifically addressing the usage of hyphens and grammatical correctness. These modifications align well with the PR objectives of enhancing documentation quality.
No functional changes were made to the code, ensuring that the existing behavior remains unchanged. The improvements contribute to better readability and understanding of the
Routestruct and theregistermethod.ctx_interface_gen.go (1)
274-275: Excellent documentation improvements for SendFile method!The changes to the
SendFilemethod documentation are clear and beneficial:
- The addition of information about file compression default behavior and how to enable it provides valuable guidance to users.
- The clarification about the Content-Type header being set based on the file format rather than just the file extension is more accurate and informative.
These updates align well with the PR objectives and enhance the overall quality of the documentation.
docs/api/ctx.md (2)
Line range hint
1712-1750: LGTM! Documentation improvements for SendFile config.The updates to the SendFile configuration struct documentation are clear and informative. The clarifications on default values for various fields (Compress, ByteRange, Download, CacheDuration, MaxAge) and the explanation of the Content-Type behavior enhance the overall understanding of the SendFile method.
Line range hint
1764-1814: LGTM! Helpful example added for SendFile usage.The new example demonstrating how to disable compression when using SendFile is a valuable addition. It clearly shows how to use the SendFile configuration struct to customize the method's behavior.
Description
These changes include:
fiber.toSendFilefor theSendFileconfig parameter in the docs.SendFilestruct fields consistent (matching theFSfield and most middleware configs.case sensitive(Not related toSendfilebut I noticed it when I was refactoring).Changes introduced
SendFileusage.Type of change
Checklist
/docs/directory for Fiber's documentation.