-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Survey relations used in GO-CAMs and their corresponding display in the pathway view #50
Comments
@vanaukenk I copied the relations from my query results to a new google sheet here: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1Gt1rgPocGQ4uNKgzBhbp3vCJa-HRzzjPx0GQkwcj81Q/edit?usp=drive_link @tmushayahama's spreadsheet may have more info. |
Thank you @dustine32 ! |
@dustine32 - should we also add the CHEBI -> MF relations, i.e.: 'is small molecule inhibitor of' |
See #33 |
@vanaukenk Yep, my initial query didn't look for relations in the CHEBI -> MF direction. You can add those two to the spreadsheet and I'll try editing my query to get both directions. |
@dustine32 - the two small molecule regulator relations are now at the bottom of your spreadsheet. Thx. |
@vanaukenk To confirm the final list of used CHEBI -> MF relations, I ran the updated query and those small molecule regulator relations are indeed the only relations found other than a few uses of "directly positively regulates" used in 7 models (e.g., SP_GADD34- PPP1CA). |
@dustine32 @tmushayahama
Can you link the relations spreadsheet Tremayne showed at last week's Noctua workbenches meeting to this ticket so we can keep track centrally of what the overall status is for this work?
Thanks!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: