Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

NTR: acetaldehyde dehydrogenase (NADP+?) activity #29544

Closed
ValWood opened this issue Jan 16, 2025 · 21 comments
Closed

NTR: acetaldehyde dehydrogenase (NADP+?) activity #29544

ValWood opened this issue Jan 16, 2025 · 21 comments

Comments

@ValWood
Copy link
Contributor

ValWood commented Jan 16, 2025

Please provide as much information as you can:

  • Suggested term label:

similar to #29540 (comment)
we only have a generic aldehyde dehydrogenase.
https://www.ebi.ac.uk/QuickGO/GTerm?id=GO:0004029 with multiple children

I would like a child of aldehyde dehydrogenase
for modelling ethanol detoxification pathway precisely

  • Definition (free text)

Catalysis of the reaction: acetaldehyde + NADP+ + H2O = acetic acid/acetate + NADPH + H+.

  • Reference, in format PMID:#######
    (REQUIRED)

  • Gene product name and ID to be annotated to this term
    https://www.pombase.org/gene/SPAC9E9.09c
    https://www.pombase.org/gene/SPAC922.07c

  • Parent term(s)

  • Children terms (if applicable) Should any existing terms that should be moved underneath this new proposed term?

  • Synonyms (please specify, EXACT, BROAD, NARROW or RELATED)

  • Cross-references

  • For enzymes, please provide RHEA and/or EC numbers.

  • Can also provide MetaCyc, KEGG, Wikipedia, and other links.

  • Any other information

@ValWood
Copy link
Contributor Author

ValWood commented Jan 16, 2025

@sjm41
Copy link
Contributor

sjm41 commented Jan 16, 2025

Are you sure you want the NADP version?

The NADP version is RHEA:25298
acetaldehyde + NADP(+) + H2O = acetate + NADPH + 2 H(+)
That would be a child of GO:0033721 aldehyde dehydrogenase (NADP+) activity

The NAD version is https://www.rhea-db.org/rhea/25294
acetaldehyde + NAD(+) + H2O = acetate + NADH + 2 H(+)

RHEA:25294 is currently a narrow xref on the parent term GO:0004029 you mention, so we could remove that and create the new child term.

@ValWood
Copy link
Contributor Author

ValWood commented Jan 16, 2025

currently we have

GO:0004029 | aldehyde dehydrogenase (NAD+) activity | IBA with 68409 , 620252 , MGI:1861722 , 69219 , Q4WCK7 , S000005901 , P08157 , Q43274 , MGI:1353450 , FBgn0012036 , P05091 , P48644 , P00352 , S000000875 , P17445 , 2087 , PTN000192421 , P49189

by IBA which is why I suggested NAD+

(Although I think chatGPT mentioned that the enzyme could use NAD or NADP, I will see if I can find support for this)

@ValWood
Copy link
Contributor Author

ValWood commented Jan 16, 2025

Im looking at
https://dev.pombase.org/gene/SPAC9E9.09c

@sjm41
Copy link
Contributor

sjm41 commented Jan 16, 2025

Your original request was for a child of the NAD version (GO:0004029) but then the reaction you provided stated NADP:

Catalysis of the reaction: acetaldehyde + NADP+ + H2O = acetic acid/acetate + NADPH + H+.

So, just need to clarify which you need - NAD or NADP!

@ValWood
Copy link
Contributor Author

ValWood commented Jan 16, 2025

S. cerevisiae has 3 paralogs
YER073W ALD5
Mitochondrial aldehyde dehydrogenase; involved in regulation or biosynthesis of electron transport chain components and acetate formation; activated by K+; utilizes NADP+ as the preferred coenzyme; constitutively expressed

YOR374W ALD4
Mitochondrial aldehyde dehydrogenase; required for growth on ethanol and conversion of acetaldehyde to acetate; phosphorylated; activity is K+ dependent; utilizes NADP+ or NAD+ equally as coenzymes; expression is glucose repressed; can substitute for cytosolic NADP-dependent aldehyde dehydrogenase when directed to the cytosol; polymerizes into filaments in meiotic cells; human homolog ALDH2 can complement yeast ald4 mutant

YPL061W ALD6
Cytosolic aldehyde dehydrogenase; activated by Mg2+ and utilizes NADP+ as the preferred coenzyme; required for conversion of acetaldehyde to acetate; constitutively expressed; localizes to the mitochondrial outer surface upon oxidative stress; negative regulator of nonselective autophagy; Stb5p directly regulates the expression of ALD6 mRNA and directly binds to the ALD6 promoter

So I suspect the pombe single copy can probably use NAD/NADP either!
Can we have NAD(P)?
What do we normally do in this situation?

@sjm41
Copy link
Contributor

sjm41 commented Jan 16, 2025

So we already have this parent term that covers both:
GO:0004030 aldehyde dehydrogenase [NAD(P)+] activity

And then I see that we have a child of that term that also covers both, with specific grandchildren
GO:0019115 benzaldehyde dehydrogenase [NAD(P)+] activity
...GO:0018477 benzaldehyde dehydrogenase (NADP+) activity
...GO:0018479 benzaldehyde dehydrogenase (NAD+) activity

So there's a precedent for doing this:
NTR acetaldehyde dehydrogenase [NAD(P)+] activity
...NTR acetaldehyde dehydrogenase (NADP+) activity RHEA:25298
...NTR acetaldehyde dehydrogenase (NAD+) activity RHEA: 25294

Would be good to get @pgaudet's view when she's back.

@ValWood
Copy link
Contributor Author

ValWood commented Jan 16, 2025

OK, not urgent, thanks

@ValWood
Copy link
Contributor Author

ValWood commented Jan 20, 2025

If we have an editors call can we discuss this?
Required for a GO-CAM

@ValWood
Copy link
Contributor Author

ValWood commented Jan 20, 2025

@pgaudet spotted that some of the activities are not aligned for acetaldehyde /aldehyde in the definitions.

Also many NADH/NADHP aldehydes are not children of the generic term

@ValWood ValWood removed the quick fix label Jan 20, 2025
@pgaudet
Copy link
Contributor

pgaudet commented Jan 27, 2025

Can you specify the actions you're requesting ?
It seems the NADP+ reaction is in GO

Image

Which children is it missing?

@ValWood
Copy link
Contributor Author

ValWood commented Jan 27, 2025

The problem is that I am annotating the orthologs (2 paralogs) of S. cerevisiae acetaldehyde. S. cerevisiae has 4 copies with various substrate specificity, some NADP+ as the preferred and some NAD/NADP equally. I can't guess the pombe gene specificity, so I wanted to annotate to an agnostic parent NAD(P) term that is agnostic to NAD/NADP .

This seems to be the practice for other terms so I would need
NTR acetaldehyde dehydrogenase [NAD(P)+] activity
(note I need specifically acetaldehyde not just the generic aldehyde to complete

the current IBA annotations are imprecise because they refer explicitly to NAD+ (which is not a given), and because they
are a generic grouping terms referring to aldehyde rather than acetaldehyde
https://www.pombase.org/gene/SPAC922.07c
https://www.pombase.org/gene/SPAC9E9.09c

@pgaudet
Copy link
Contributor

pgaudet commented Jan 27, 2025

There is something confusing in RHEA:
https://www.rhea-db.org/rhea/25298
is linked to EC 1.2.1.4 aldehyde dehydrogenase (NADP(+))

but shows acetaldehyde as a substrate.

@kaxelsen Can this be clarified?

Thanks, Pascale

@kaxelsen
Copy link

RHEA:25298 (acetaldehyde) is a child of RHEA:11888 (aldehyde). As acetaldehyde is not mentioned in the entry for EC 1.2.1.4 at IUBMB, I will remove RHEA:25298 from the EC number.

@pgaudet
Copy link
Contributor

pgaudet commented Jan 28, 2025

+[Term]
+id: GO:0140087
+name: acetaldehyde dehydrogenase (NAD+) activity
+namespace: molecular_function
+def: "Catalysis of the reaction: acetaldehyde + NAD+ + H2O = acetate + NADH + 2 H+." [PMID:9473035, RHEA:25294]
+xref: RHEA:25294
+is_a: GO:0004029 ! aldehyde dehydrogenase (NAD+) activity
+property_value: term_tracker_item "#29544" xsd:anyURI
+created_by: pg
+creation_date: 2025-01-28T07:26:40Z
+
+[Term]
+id: GO:0140088
+name: acetaldehyde dehydrogenase (NADP+) activity
+namespace: molecular_function
+def: "Catalysis of the reaction: acetaldehyde + NADP+ + H2O = acetate + NADPH + 2 H+." [PMID:15659684, PMID:9473035, RHEA:25298]
+xref: RHEA:25298
+is_a: GO:0033721 ! aldehyde dehydrogenase (NADP+) activity
+property_value: term_tracker_item "#29544" xsd:anyURI
+created_by: pg
+creation_date: 2025-01-28T07:28:10Z

@pgaudet pgaudet self-assigned this Jan 28, 2025
@pgaudet
Copy link
Contributor

pgaudet commented Jan 28, 2025

@ValWood

The annotation guidelines (and GO principles in general) state that the NAD(P) form should only be used if the H acceptor is not known; if it can use both, we should co-annotate.

So I'd prefer to create the grouping term aldehyde dehydrogenase [NAD(P)+] activity, since it's not needed for now.

OK ?

Thanks, Pascale

@sjm41
Copy link
Contributor

sjm41 commented Jan 28, 2025

Hi @pgaudet

Just checking you saw this comment above (I don't recall if the QC checks will catch this):

RHEA:25294 is currently a narrow xref on the parent term GO:0004029 you mention, so we could remove that and create the new child term.

@ValWood
Copy link
Contributor Author

ValWood commented Jan 28, 2025

That's the problem. I have 2 paralogs in pombe. There are 4 paralogs in S. cerevisiae. These are independent duplications after speciation.
I don't know the specificities of either of the acetaldehyde dehydrogenase's, they could be one, or the other or both.
Maybe I am being too conservative if these enzymes may all be promiscuous to come degree? I just don't know. If you think it is safe, I will co-annotate to both terms.

Ignore it; I think it's fine to use NAD+ because that's the output from the previous reaction.

@pgaudet
Copy link
Contributor

pgaudet commented Jan 28, 2025

I though this is what I did

+[Term]
+id: GO:0140087
+name: acetaldehyde dehydrogenase (NAD+) activity
+namespace: molecular_function
+def: "Catalysis of the reaction: acetaldehyde + NAD+ + H2O = acetate + NADH + 2 H+." [PMID:9473035, RHEA:25294]
+xref: RHEA:25294
+is_a: GO:0004029 ! aldehyde dehydrogenase (NAD+) activity
+property_value: term_tracker_item "#29544" xsd:anyURI
+created_by: pg
+creation_date: 2025-01-28T07:26:40Z

Let me know if I made a mistake.

Thanks, Pascale

@sjm41
Copy link
Contributor

sjm41 commented Jan 28, 2025

New term looks good, I was just checking if you'd also removed RHEA:25294 from the parent term GO:0004029 ?

@pgaudet
Copy link
Contributor

pgaudet commented Jan 28, 2025

Yes, thanks for checking !

pgaudet added a commit that referenced this issue Jan 28, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants