-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 40
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
NTR: acetaldehyde dehydrogenase (NADP+?) activity #29544
Comments
I can't locate a Rhea for this but there are plenty of references in |
Are you sure you want the NADP version? The NADP version is RHEA:25298 The NAD version is https://www.rhea-db.org/rhea/25294 RHEA:25294 is currently a narrow xref on the parent term GO:0004029 you mention, so we could remove that and create the new child term. |
currently we have GO:0004029 | aldehyde dehydrogenase (NAD+) activity | IBA with 68409 , 620252 , MGI:1861722 , 69219 , Q4WCK7 , S000005901 , P08157 , Q43274 , MGI:1353450 , FBgn0012036 , P05091 , P48644 , P00352 , S000000875 , P17445 , 2087 , PTN000192421 , P49189 by IBA which is why I suggested NAD+ (Although I think chatGPT mentioned that the enzyme could use NAD or NADP, I will see if I can find support for this) |
Im looking at |
Your original request was for a child of the NAD version (GO:0004029) but then the reaction you provided stated NADP:
So, just need to clarify which you need - NAD or NADP! |
S. cerevisiae has 3 paralogs YOR374W ALD4 YPL061W ALD6 So I suspect the pombe single copy can probably use NAD/NADP either! |
So we already have this parent term that covers both: And then I see that we have a child of that term that also covers both, with specific grandchildren So there's a precedent for doing this: Would be good to get @pgaudet's view when she's back. |
OK, not urgent, thanks |
If we have an editors call can we discuss this? |
@pgaudet spotted that some of the activities are not aligned for acetaldehyde /aldehyde in the definitions. Also many NADH/NADHP aldehydes are not children of the generic term |
The problem is that I am annotating the orthologs (2 paralogs) of S. cerevisiae acetaldehyde. S. cerevisiae has 4 copies with various substrate specificity, some NADP+ as the preferred and some NAD/NADP equally. I can't guess the pombe gene specificity, so I wanted to annotate to an agnostic parent NAD(P) term that is agnostic to NAD/NADP . This seems to be the practice for other terms so I would need the current IBA annotations are imprecise because they refer explicitly to NAD+ (which is not a given), and because they |
There is something confusing in RHEA: but shows acetaldehyde as a substrate. @kaxelsen Can this be clarified? Thanks, Pascale |
RHEA:25298 (acetaldehyde) is a child of RHEA:11888 (aldehyde). As acetaldehyde is not mentioned in the entry for EC 1.2.1.4 at IUBMB, I will remove RHEA:25298 from the EC number. |
+[Term] |
The annotation guidelines (and GO principles in general) state that the NAD(P) form should only be used if the H acceptor is not known; if it can use both, we should co-annotate. So I'd prefer to create the grouping term aldehyde dehydrogenase [NAD(P)+] activity, since it's not needed for now. OK ? Thanks, Pascale |
Hi @pgaudet Just checking you saw this comment above (I don't recall if the QC checks will catch this):
|
Ignore it; I think it's fine to use NAD+ because that's the output from the previous reaction. |
I though this is what I did
Let me know if I made a mistake. Thanks, Pascale |
New term looks good, I was just checking if you'd also removed RHEA:25294 from the parent term GO:0004029 ? |
Yes, thanks for checking ! |
Please provide as much information as you can:
similar to #29540 (comment)
we only have a generic aldehyde dehydrogenase.
https://www.ebi.ac.uk/QuickGO/GTerm?id=GO:0004029 with multiple children
I would like a child of aldehyde dehydrogenase
for modelling ethanol detoxification pathway precisely
Catalysis of the reaction: acetaldehyde + NADP+ + H2O = acetic acid/acetate + NADPH + H+.
Reference, in format PMID:#######
(REQUIRED)
Gene product name and ID to be annotated to this term
https://www.pombase.org/gene/SPAC9E9.09c
https://www.pombase.org/gene/SPAC922.07c
Parent term(s)
Children terms (if applicable) Should any existing terms that should be moved underneath this new proposed term?
Synonyms (please specify, EXACT, BROAD, NARROW or RELATED)
Cross-references
For enzymes, please provide RHEA and/or EC numbers.
Can also provide MetaCyc, KEGG, Wikipedia, and other links.
Any other information
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: