Added release note

[jschoen-gefyra]

Contributor Pull Request

Description

Motivation and Context

How has this been tested?

Snippets or Screenshots (if necessary):

Types of changes

• Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
• New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
• Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)

Checklist:

• My code follows the code style of this IG / specification.
• My change requires a change to the documentation or narrative (intend) of the IG.
• I have already updated the documentation / narrative (intend) accordingly.

Reviewer / Quality Assurance Checklist

• The Present PR does not need a thorough review process, due to brevity, low complexity or because it represents a rather minor change; otherwise go trough the list! ... and read the linked manual, if you did not do it yet!

content review steps (based on Best Practice IG Germany)

• no content review needed
• cardinalities in profiles are added with caution (specially 'max') and are thoroughly motivated in a comment
• modifying-Elements are highlighted
• meta.profile Elements not added or added with extreme caution
• StructureDefinition.description is filled
• Constrained Elements contain
  • naming in ElementDefinition.short
  • ElementDefinition.comment contains a motivation
• Capability Statement exists
  • the textual searchparameters of every instance do correspond to the definition within the CapabilityStatement
• relevant examples exist

formal intellectual review steps of Implementation Guide

• no formal review needed

• proofreading for orthography

• there are no (critical) validation Errors in the CI pipeline

  • inspected and no critical errors found(In the "github action view" -> Option button -> "View raw logs") - possibly list non-critical below

• skim reading for correct rendering of IG (possibly using IG-grep of string String like "Could not render")

automated review steps:

• no formal review needed
• check IG-pages for broken links (possibly using plug-in)
• [ ]

For reviewers

You migh use this: https://conventionalcomments.org/

[jschoen-gefyra]

@f-peverali falls #464 durchgeht, hast du hier den Release-Note für die nächste TC.