Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[FS-172266, FS-199069] : Conductor Monitor Changes for queue depth metrics #28

Open
wants to merge 33 commits into
base: freshservice_staging
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

keerthivaasan-kanagaraj
Copy link
Collaborator

Pull Request type

  • Bugfix
  • Feature
  • Refactoring (no functional changes, no api changes)
  • Build related changes (Please run ./gradlew generateLock saveLock to refresh dependencies)
  • WHOSUSING.md
  • Other (please describe):

NOTE: Please remember to run ./gradlew spotlessApply to fix any format violations.

Changes in this PR

Describe the new behavior from this PR, and why it's needed
Issue #

Alternatives considered

Describe alternative implementation you have considered

@prabhakaranE6157 prabhakaranE6157 changed the base branch from freshservice_staging to lt_test_load_gowtham October 16, 2024 12:31
@keerthivaasan-kanagaraj keerthivaasan-kanagaraj changed the title [FS-172266] : Fixing conductor prom metrics [FS-172266, FS-199069] : Conductor Monitor Changes for queue depth metrics Oct 29, 2024
@keerthivaasan-kanagaraj keerthivaasan-kanagaraj changed the base branch from lt_test_load_gowtham to freshservice_staging October 29, 2024 07:47
taskDef -> {
}

// Commented out as we don't have use case for Pending Workflows as of now and hence we don't have pending workflow implementation from

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

  • Remove these code if they are no longer needed
  • We can always get them from the version control

Copy link

@geethalladi geethalladi left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Mostly good. +1

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants