Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Revert "Add new file context rabbitmq_conf_t." #210

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: rawhide
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

Richard-Filo
Copy link
Contributor

@Richard-Filo Richard-Filo commented Feb 24, 2020

Reverts #179

Reason is that I forgot to ask maintainer of rabbitmq if it is expected behavior that a program which rabbitmq server uses, can write to own configuration file.
I create BZ: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1803126.
And now I'm waiting for answer. In the meantime I'm reverting this PR.

@zpytela
Copy link
Contributor

zpytela commented Mar 3, 2020

np with reverting; but what will be the next step?

@wrabcak
Copy link
Member

wrabcak commented Mar 3, 2020

It's important also to understand, why we're reverting it and avoid it in future.

@WOnder93
Copy link
Member

WOnder93 commented Mar 3, 2020

Also please explain the reason for reverting in the commit message. Revert without any explanation is a very bad practice.

@zpytela
Copy link
Contributor

zpytela commented Mar 12, 2020

@Richard-Filo, please include the explanation to the commit message so that it is clear and understandable and make the first comment match the commit message.

Reverts fedora-selinux#179

Reason is that I forgot to ask maintainer of rabbitmq if it is expected behavior that a program which rabbitmq server uses, can write to own configuration file.
I create BZ: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1803126.
And now I'm waiting for answer. In the meantime I'm reverting this PR.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants