-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 79
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
universal8895: Fix warnings/errors on R #4
Open
SlimShadys
wants to merge
1
commit into
exynos8895:lineage-17.1
Choose a base branch
from
SlimShadys:lineage-18.0
base: lineage-17.1
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Signed-off-by: Gianmarco Scarano <[email protected]>
ivanmeler
referenced
this pull request
in 8890q/android_kernel_samsung_universal8895
Aug 29, 2022
Avoid calling cgroup_threadgroup_change_end() without having called cgroup_threadgroup_change_begin() first. During process creation we need to check whether the cgroup we are in allows us to fork. To perform this check the cgroup needs to guard itself against threadgroup changes and takes a lock. Prior to CLONE_PIDFD the cleanup target "bad_fork_free_pid" would also need to call cgroup_threadgroup_change_end() because said lock had already been taken. However, this is not the case anymore with the addition of CLONE_PIDFD. We are now allocating a pidfd before we check whether the cgroup we're in can fork and thus prior to taking the lock. So when copy_process() fails at the right step it would release a lock we haven't taken. This bug is not even very subtle to be honest. It's just not very clear from the naming of cgroup_threadgroup_change_{begin,end}() that a lock is taken. Here's the relevant splat: entry_SYSENTER_compat+0x70/0x7f arch/x86/entry/entry_64_compat.S:139 RIP: 0023:0xf7fec849 Code: 85 d2 74 02 89 0a 5b 5d c3 8b 04 24 c3 8b 14 24 c3 8b 3c 24 c3 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 51 52 55 89 e5 0f 34 cd 80 <5d> 5a 59 c3 90 90 90 90 eb 0d 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 RSP: 002b:00000000ffed5a8c EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000078 RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000003ffc RCX: 0000000000000000 RDX: 00000000200005c0 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 0000000000000000 RBP: 0000000000000012 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000 R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: 0000000000000000 R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000000 ------------[ cut here ]------------ DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(depth <= 0) WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 7744 at kernel/locking/lockdep.c:4052 __lock_release kernel/locking/lockdep.c:4052 [inline] WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 7744 at kernel/locking/lockdep.c:4052 lock_release+0x667/0xa00 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:4321 Kernel panic - not syncing: panic_on_warn set ... CPU: 1 PID: 7744 Comm: syz-executor007 Not tainted 5.1.0+ #4 Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 01/01/2011 Call Trace: __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:77 [inline] dump_stack+0x172/0x1f0 lib/dump_stack.c:113 panic+0x2cb/0x65c kernel/panic.c:214 __warn.cold+0x20/0x45 kernel/panic.c:566 report_bug+0x263/0x2b0 lib/bug.c:186 fixup_bug arch/x86/kernel/traps.c:179 [inline] fixup_bug arch/x86/kernel/traps.c:174 [inline] do_error_trap+0x11b/0x200 arch/x86/kernel/traps.c:272 do_invalid_op+0x37/0x50 arch/x86/kernel/traps.c:291 invalid_op+0x14/0x20 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:972 RIP: 0010:__lock_release kernel/locking/lockdep.c:4052 [inline] RIP: 0010:lock_release+0x667/0xa00 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:4321 Code: 0f 85 a0 03 00 00 8b 35 77 66 08 08 85 f6 75 23 48 c7 c6 a0 55 6b 87 48 c7 c7 40 25 6b 87 4c 89 85 70 ff ff ff e8 b7 a9 eb ff <0f> 0b 4c 8b 85 70 ff ff ff 4c 89 ea 4c 89 e6 4c 89 c7 e8 52 63 ff RSP: 0018:ffff888094117b48 EFLAGS: 00010086 RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 1ffff11012822f6f RCX: 0000000000000000 RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: ffffffff815af236 RDI: ffffed1012822f5b RBP: ffff888094117c00 R08: ffff888092bfc400 R09: fffffbfff113301d R10: fffffbfff113301c R11: ffffffff889980e3 R12: ffffffff8a451df8 R13: ffffffff8142e71f R14: ffffffff8a44cc80 R15: ffff888094117bd8 percpu_up_read.constprop.0+0xcb/0x110 include/linux/percpu-rwsem.h:92 cgroup_threadgroup_change_end include/linux/cgroup-defs.h:712 [inline] copy_process.part.0+0x47ff/0x6710 kernel/fork.c:2222 copy_process kernel/fork.c:1772 [inline] _do_fork+0x25d/0xfd0 kernel/fork.c:2338 __do_compat_sys_x86_clone arch/x86/ia32/sys_ia32.c:240 [inline] __se_compat_sys_x86_clone arch/x86/ia32/sys_ia32.c:236 [inline] __ia32_compat_sys_x86_clone+0xbc/0x140 arch/x86/ia32/sys_ia32.c:236 do_syscall_32_irqs_on arch/x86/entry/common.c:334 [inline] do_fast_syscall_32+0x281/0xd54 arch/x86/entry/common.c:405 entry_SYSENTER_compat+0x70/0x7f arch/x86/entry/entry_64_compat.S:139 RIP: 0023:0xf7fec849 Code: 85 d2 74 02 89 0a 5b 5d c3 8b 04 24 c3 8b 14 24 c3 8b 3c 24 c3 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 51 52 55 89 e5 0f 34 cd 80 <5d> 5a 59 c3 90 90 90 90 eb 0d 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 RSP: 002b:00000000ffed5a8c EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000078 RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000003ffc RCX: 0000000000000000 RDX: 00000000200005c0 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 0000000000000000 RBP: 0000000000000012 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000 R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: 0000000000000000 R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000000 Kernel Offset: disabled Rebooting in 86400 seconds.. Reported-and-tested-by: [email protected] Fixes: b3e583825266 ("clone: add CLONE_PIDFD") Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <[email protected]> (cherry picked from commit c3b7112df86b769927a60a6d7175988ca3d60f09) Bug: 135608568 Test: test program using syscall(__NR_sys_pidfd_open,..) and poll() Change-Id: Ib9ecb1e5c0c6e2d062b89c25109ec571570eb497 Signed-off-by: Suren Baghdasaryan <[email protected]>
Royna2544
referenced
this pull request
in Roynas-Android-Playground/android_kernel_samsung_universal8895
May 15, 2023
…g the sock [ Upstream commit 3cf7203ca620682165706f70a1b12b5194607dce ] There is a race condition in vxlan that when deleting a vxlan device during receiving packets, there is a possibility that the sock is released after getting vxlan_sock vs from sk_user_data. Then in later vxlan_ecn_decapsulate(), vxlan_get_sk_family() we will got NULL pointer dereference. e.g. #0 [ffffa25ec6978a38] machine_kexec at ffffffff8c669757 8890q#1 [ffffa25ec6978a90] __crash_kexec at ffffffff8c7c0a4d 8890q#2 [ffffa25ec6978b58] crash_kexec at ffffffff8c7c1c48 8890q#3 [ffffa25ec6978b60] oops_end at ffffffff8c627f2b 8890q#4 [ffffa25ec6978b80] page_fault_oops at ffffffff8c678fcb exynos8895#5 [ffffa25ec6978bd8] exc_page_fault at ffffffff8d109542 exynos8895#6 [ffffa25ec6978c00] asm_exc_page_fault at ffffffff8d200b62 [exception RIP: vxlan_ecn_decapsulate+0x3b] RIP: ffffffffc1014e7b RSP: ffffa25ec6978cb0 RFLAGS: 00010246 RAX: 0000000000000008 RBX: ffff8aa000888000 RCX: 0000000000000000 RDX: 000000000000000e RSI: ffff8a9fc7ab803e RDI: ffff8a9fd1168700 RBP: ffff8a9fc7ab803e R8: 0000000000700000 R9: 00000000000010ae R10: ffff8a9fcb748980 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffff8a9fd1168700 R13: ffff8aa000888000 R14: 00000000002a0000 R15: 00000000000010ae ORIG_RAX: ffffffffffffffff CS: 0010 SS: 0018 exynos8895#7 [ffffa25ec6978ce8] vxlan_rcv at ffffffffc10189cd [vxlan] exynos8895#8 [ffffa25ec6978d90] udp_queue_rcv_one_skb at ffffffff8cfb6507 exynos8895#9 [ffffa25ec6978dc0] udp_unicast_rcv_skb at ffffffff8cfb6e45 exynos8895#10 [ffffa25ec6978dc8] __udp4_lib_rcv at ffffffff8cfb8807 exynos8895#11 [ffffa25ec6978e20] ip_protocol_deliver_rcu at ffffffff8cf76951 exynos8895#12 [ffffa25ec6978e48] ip_local_deliver at ffffffff8cf76bde exynos8895#13 [ffffa25ec6978ea0] __netif_receive_skb_one_core at ffffffff8cecde9b exynos8895#14 [ffffa25ec6978ec8] process_backlog at ffffffff8cece139 exynos8895#15 [ffffa25ec6978f00] __napi_poll at ffffffff8ceced1a exynos8895#16 [ffffa25ec6978f28] net_rx_action at ffffffff8cecf1f3 exynos8895#17 [ffffa25ec6978fa0] __softirqentry_text_start at ffffffff8d4000ca exynos8895#18 [ffffa25ec6978ff0] do_softirq at ffffffff8c6fbdc3 Reproducer: https://github.com/Mellanox/ovs-tests/blob/master/test-ovs-vxlan-remove-tunnel-during-traffic.sh Fix this by waiting for all sk_user_data reader to finish before releasing the sock. Reported-by: Jianlin Shi <[email protected]> Suggested-by: Jakub Sitnicki <[email protected]> Fixes: 6a93cc9 ("udp-tunnel: Add a few more UDP tunnel APIs") Signed-off-by: Hangbin Liu <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Jiri Pirko <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Ulrich Hecht <[email protected]>
Royna2544
referenced
this pull request
in Roynas-Android-Playground/android_kernel_samsung_universal8895
May 15, 2023
[ Upstream commit b18cba09e374637a0a3759d856a6bca94c133952 ] Commit 9130b8dbc6ac ("SUNRPC: allow for upcalls for the same uid but different gss service") introduced `auth` argument to __gss_find_upcall(), but in gss_pipe_downcall() it was left as NULL since it (and auth->service) was not (yet) determined. When multiple upcalls with the same uid and different service are ongoing, it could happen that __gss_find_upcall(), which returns the first match found in the pipe->in_downcall list, could not find the correct gss_msg corresponding to the downcall we are looking for. Moreover, it might return a msg which is not sent to rpc.gssd yet. We could see mount.nfs process hung in D state with multiple mount.nfs are executed in parallel. The call trace below is of CentOS 7.9 kernel-3.10.0-1160.24.1.el7.x86_64 but we observed the same hang w/ elrepo kernel-ml-6.0.7-1.el7. PID: 71258 TASK: ffff91ebd4be0000 CPU: 36 COMMAND: "mount.nfs" #0 [ffff9203ca3234f8] __schedule at ffffffffa3b8899f 8890q#1 [ffff9203ca323580] schedule at ffffffffa3b88eb9 8890q#2 [ffff9203ca323590] gss_cred_init at ffffffffc0355818 [auth_rpcgss] 8890q#3 [ffff9203ca323658] rpcauth_lookup_credcache at ffffffffc0421ebc [sunrpc] 8890q#4 [ffff9203ca3236d8] gss_lookup_cred at ffffffffc0353633 [auth_rpcgss] exynos8895#5 [ffff9203ca3236e8] rpcauth_lookupcred at ffffffffc0421581 [sunrpc] exynos8895#6 [ffff9203ca323740] rpcauth_refreshcred at ffffffffc04223d3 [sunrpc] exynos8895#7 [ffff9203ca3237a0] call_refresh at ffffffffc04103dc [sunrpc] exynos8895#8 [ffff9203ca3237b8] __rpc_execute at ffffffffc041e1c9 [sunrpc] exynos8895#9 [ffff9203ca323820] rpc_execute at ffffffffc0420a48 [sunrpc] The scenario is like this. Let's say there are two upcalls for services A and B, A -> B in pipe->in_downcall, B -> A in pipe->pipe. When rpc.gssd reads pipe to get the upcall msg corresponding to service B from pipe->pipe and then writes the response, in gss_pipe_downcall the msg corresponding to service A will be picked because only uid is used to find the msg and it is before the one for B in pipe->in_downcall. And the process waiting for the msg corresponding to service A will be woken up. Actual scheduing of that process might be after rpc.gssd processes the next msg. In rpc_pipe_generic_upcall it clears msg->errno (for A). The process is scheduled to see gss_msg->ctx == NULL and gss_msg->msg.errno == 0, therefore it cannot break the loop in gss_create_upcall and is never woken up after that. This patch adds a simple check to ensure that a msg which is not sent to rpc.gssd yet is not chosen as the matching upcall upon receiving a downcall. Signed-off-by: minoura makoto <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Hiroshi Shimamoto <[email protected]> Tested-by: Hiroshi Shimamoto <[email protected]> Cc: Trond Myklebust <[email protected]> Fixes: 9130b8dbc6ac ("SUNRPC: allow for upcalls for same uid but different gss service") Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]> [uli: backport to 4.4] Signed-off-by: Ulrich Hecht <[email protected]>
Royna2544
referenced
this pull request
in Roynas-Android-Playground/android_kernel_samsung_universal8895
May 15, 2023
[ Upstream commit 6c4ca03bd890566d873e3593b32d034bf2f5a087 ] During EEH error injection testing, a deadlock was encountered in the tg3 driver when tg3_io_error_detected() was attempting to cancel outstanding reset tasks: crash> foreach UN bt ... PID: 159 TASK: c0000000067c6000 CPU: 8 COMMAND: "eehd" ... exynos8895#5 [c00000000681f990] __cancel_work_timer at c00000000019fd18 exynos8895#6 [c00000000681fa30] tg3_io_error_detected at c00800000295f098 [tg3] exynos8895#7 [c00000000681faf0] eeh_report_error at c00000000004e25c ... PID: 290 TASK: c000000036e5f800 CPU: 6 COMMAND: "kworker/6:1" ... 8890q#4 [c00000003721fbc0] rtnl_lock at c000000000c940d8 exynos8895#5 [c00000003721fbe0] tg3_reset_task at c008000002969358 [tg3] exynos8895#6 [c00000003721fc60] process_one_work at c00000000019e5c4 ... PID: 296 TASK: c000000037a65800 CPU: 21 COMMAND: "kworker/21:1" ... 8890q#4 [c000000037247bc0] rtnl_lock at c000000000c940d8 exynos8895#5 [c000000037247be0] tg3_reset_task at c008000002969358 [tg3] exynos8895#6 [c000000037247c60] process_one_work at c00000000019e5c4 ... PID: 655 TASK: c000000036f49000 CPU: 16 COMMAND: "kworker/16:2" ...:1 8890q#4 [c0000000373ebbc0] rtnl_lock at c000000000c940d8 exynos8895#5 [c0000000373ebbe0] tg3_reset_task at c008000002969358 [tg3] exynos8895#6 [c0000000373ebc60] process_one_work at c00000000019e5c4 ... Code inspection shows that both tg3_io_error_detected() and tg3_reset_task() attempt to acquire the RTNL lock at the beginning of their code blocks. If tg3_reset_task() should happen to execute between the times when tg3_io_error_deteced() acquires the RTNL lock and tg3_reset_task_cancel() is called, a deadlock will occur. Moving tg3_reset_task_cancel() call earlier within the code block, prior to acquiring RTNL, prevents this from happening, but also exposes another deadlock issue where tg3_reset_task() may execute AFTER tg3_io_error_detected() has executed: crash> foreach UN bt PID: 159 TASK: c0000000067d2000 CPU: 9 COMMAND: "eehd" ... 8890q#4 [c000000006867a60] rtnl_lock at c000000000c940d8 exynos8895#5 [c000000006867a80] tg3_io_slot_reset at c0080000026c2ea8 [tg3] exynos8895#6 [c000000006867b00] eeh_report_reset at c00000000004de88 ... PID: 363 TASK: c000000037564000 CPU: 6 COMMAND: "kworker/6:1" ... 8890q#3 [c000000036c1bb70] msleep at c000000000259e6c 8890q#4 [c000000036c1bba0] napi_disable at c000000000c6b848 exynos8895#5 [c000000036c1bbe0] tg3_reset_task at c0080000026d942c [tg3] exynos8895#6 [c000000036c1bc60] process_one_work at c00000000019e5c4 ... This issue can be avoided by aborting tg3_reset_task() if EEH error recovery is already in progress. Fixes: db84bf4 ("tg3: tg3_reset_task() needs to use rtnl_lock to synchronize") Signed-off-by: David Christensen <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Pavan Chebbi <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Ulrich Hecht <[email protected]>
Royna2544
referenced
this pull request
in Roynas-Android-Playground/android_kernel_samsung_universal8895
May 15, 2023
commit 60eed1e3d45045623e46944ebc7c42c30a4350f0 upstream. code path: ocfs2_ioctl_move_extents ocfs2_move_extents ocfs2_defrag_extent __ocfs2_move_extent + ocfs2_journal_access_di + ocfs2_split_extent //sub-paths call jbd2_journal_restart + ocfs2_journal_dirty //crash by jbs2 ASSERT crash stacks: PID: 11297 TASK: ffff974a676dcd00 CPU: 67 COMMAND: "defragfs.ocfs2" #0 [ffffb25d8dad3900] machine_kexec at ffffffff8386fe01 8890q#1 [ffffb25d8dad3958] __crash_kexec at ffffffff8395959d 8890q#2 [ffffb25d8dad3a20] crash_kexec at ffffffff8395a45d 8890q#3 [ffffb25d8dad3a38] oops_end at ffffffff83836d3f 8890q#4 [ffffb25d8dad3a58] do_trap at ffffffff83833205 exynos8895#5 [ffffb25d8dad3aa0] do_invalid_op at ffffffff83833aa6 exynos8895#6 [ffffb25d8dad3ac0] invalid_op at ffffffff84200d18 [exception RIP: jbd2_journal_dirty_metadata+0x2ba] RIP: ffffffffc09ca54a RSP: ffffb25d8dad3b70 RFLAGS: 00010207 RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff9706eedc5248 RCX: 0000000000000000 RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: ffff97337029ea28 RDI: ffff9706eedc5250 RBP: ffff9703c3520200 R8: 000000000f46b0b2 R9: 0000000000000000 R10: 0000000000000001 R11: 00000001000000fe R12: ffff97337029ea28 R13: 0000000000000000 R14: ffff9703de59bf60 R15: ffff9706eedc5250 ORIG_RAX: ffffffffffffffff CS: 0010 SS: 0018 exynos8895#7 [ffffb25d8dad3ba8] ocfs2_journal_dirty at ffffffffc137fb95 [ocfs2] exynos8895#8 [ffffb25d8dad3be8] __ocfs2_move_extent at ffffffffc139a950 [ocfs2] exynos8895#9 [ffffb25d8dad3c80] ocfs2_defrag_extent at ffffffffc139b2d2 [ocfs2] Analysis This bug has the same root cause of 'commit 7f27ec9 ("ocfs2: call ocfs2_journal_access_di() before ocfs2_journal_dirty() in ocfs2_write_end_nolock()")'. For this bug, jbd2_journal_restart() is called by ocfs2_split_extent() during defragmenting. How to fix For ocfs2_split_extent() can handle journal operations totally by itself. Caller doesn't need to call journal access/dirty pair, and caller only needs to call journal start/stop pair. The fix method is to remove journal access/dirty from __ocfs2_move_extent(). The discussion for this patch: https://oss.oracle.com/pipermail/ocfs2-devel/2023-February/000647.html Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Heming Zhao <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Joseph Qi <[email protected]> Cc: Mark Fasheh <[email protected]> Cc: Joel Becker <[email protected]> Cc: Junxiao Bi <[email protected]> Cc: Changwei Ge <[email protected]> Cc: Gang He <[email protected]> Cc: Jun Piao <[email protected]> Cc: <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Ulrich Hecht <[email protected]>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
AOSP Clang gave few warnings treated as errors, so I fixed them all.
Tested and compiled fine.
Signed-off-by: Gianmarco Scarano [email protected]