Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

universal8895: Fix warnings/errors on R #4

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: lineage-17.1
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

SlimShadys
Copy link

AOSP Clang gave few warnings treated as errors, so I fixed them all.
Tested and compiled fine.

  • This needs to be on lineage-18.0 branch, anyways. -
    Signed-off-by: Gianmarco Scarano [email protected]

ivanmeler referenced this pull request in 8890q/android_kernel_samsung_universal8895 Aug 29, 2022
Avoid calling cgroup_threadgroup_change_end() without having called
cgroup_threadgroup_change_begin() first.

During process creation we need to check whether the cgroup we are in
allows us to fork. To perform this check the cgroup needs to guard itself
against threadgroup changes and takes a lock.
Prior to CLONE_PIDFD the cleanup target "bad_fork_free_pid" would also need
to call cgroup_threadgroup_change_end() because said lock had already been
taken.
However, this is not the case anymore with the addition of CLONE_PIDFD. We
are now allocating a pidfd before we check whether the cgroup we're in can
fork and thus prior to taking the lock. So when copy_process() fails at the
right step it would release a lock we haven't taken.
This bug is not even very subtle to be honest. It's just not very clear
from the naming of cgroup_threadgroup_change_{begin,end}() that a lock is
taken.

Here's the relevant splat:

entry_SYSENTER_compat+0x70/0x7f arch/x86/entry/entry_64_compat.S:139
RIP: 0023:0xf7fec849
Code: 85 d2 74 02 89 0a 5b 5d c3 8b 04 24 c3 8b 14 24 c3 8b 3c 24 c3 90 90
90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 51 52 55 89 e5 0f 34 cd 80 <5d> 5a 59 c3 90
90 90 90 eb 0d 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90
RSP: 002b:00000000ffed5a8c EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000078
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000003ffc RCX: 0000000000000000
RDX: 00000000200005c0 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 0000000000000000
RBP: 0000000000000012 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: 0000000000000000
R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000000
------------[ cut here ]------------
DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(depth <= 0)
WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 7744 at kernel/locking/lockdep.c:4052 __lock_release
kernel/locking/lockdep.c:4052 [inline]
WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 7744 at kernel/locking/lockdep.c:4052
lock_release+0x667/0xa00 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:4321
Kernel panic - not syncing: panic_on_warn set ...
CPU: 1 PID: 7744 Comm: syz-executor007 Not tainted 5.1.0+ #4
Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS
Google 01/01/2011
Call Trace:
  __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:77 [inline]
  dump_stack+0x172/0x1f0 lib/dump_stack.c:113
  panic+0x2cb/0x65c kernel/panic.c:214
  __warn.cold+0x20/0x45 kernel/panic.c:566
  report_bug+0x263/0x2b0 lib/bug.c:186
  fixup_bug arch/x86/kernel/traps.c:179 [inline]
  fixup_bug arch/x86/kernel/traps.c:174 [inline]
  do_error_trap+0x11b/0x200 arch/x86/kernel/traps.c:272
  do_invalid_op+0x37/0x50 arch/x86/kernel/traps.c:291
  invalid_op+0x14/0x20 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:972
RIP: 0010:__lock_release kernel/locking/lockdep.c:4052 [inline]
RIP: 0010:lock_release+0x667/0xa00 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:4321
Code: 0f 85 a0 03 00 00 8b 35 77 66 08 08 85 f6 75 23 48 c7 c6 a0 55 6b 87
48 c7 c7 40 25 6b 87 4c 89 85 70 ff ff ff e8 b7 a9 eb ff <0f> 0b 4c 8b 85
70 ff ff ff 4c 89 ea 4c 89 e6 4c 89 c7 e8 52 63 ff
RSP: 0018:ffff888094117b48 EFLAGS: 00010086
RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 1ffff11012822f6f RCX: 0000000000000000
RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: ffffffff815af236 RDI: ffffed1012822f5b
RBP: ffff888094117c00 R08: ffff888092bfc400 R09: fffffbfff113301d
R10: fffffbfff113301c R11: ffffffff889980e3 R12: ffffffff8a451df8
R13: ffffffff8142e71f R14: ffffffff8a44cc80 R15: ffff888094117bd8
  percpu_up_read.constprop.0+0xcb/0x110 include/linux/percpu-rwsem.h:92
  cgroup_threadgroup_change_end include/linux/cgroup-defs.h:712 [inline]
  copy_process.part.0+0x47ff/0x6710 kernel/fork.c:2222
  copy_process kernel/fork.c:1772 [inline]
  _do_fork+0x25d/0xfd0 kernel/fork.c:2338
  __do_compat_sys_x86_clone arch/x86/ia32/sys_ia32.c:240 [inline]
  __se_compat_sys_x86_clone arch/x86/ia32/sys_ia32.c:236 [inline]
  __ia32_compat_sys_x86_clone+0xbc/0x140 arch/x86/ia32/sys_ia32.c:236
  do_syscall_32_irqs_on arch/x86/entry/common.c:334 [inline]
  do_fast_syscall_32+0x281/0xd54 arch/x86/entry/common.c:405
  entry_SYSENTER_compat+0x70/0x7f arch/x86/entry/entry_64_compat.S:139
RIP: 0023:0xf7fec849
Code: 85 d2 74 02 89 0a 5b 5d c3 8b 04 24 c3 8b 14 24 c3 8b 3c 24 c3 90 90
90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 51 52 55 89 e5 0f 34 cd 80 <5d> 5a 59 c3 90
90 90 90 eb 0d 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90
RSP: 002b:00000000ffed5a8c EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000078
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000003ffc RCX: 0000000000000000
RDX: 00000000200005c0 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 0000000000000000
RBP: 0000000000000012 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: 0000000000000000
R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000000
Kernel Offset: disabled
Rebooting in 86400 seconds..

Reported-and-tested-by: [email protected]
Fixes: b3e583825266 ("clone: add CLONE_PIDFD")
Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <[email protected]>

(cherry picked from commit c3b7112df86b769927a60a6d7175988ca3d60f09)

Bug: 135608568
Test: test program using syscall(__NR_sys_pidfd_open,..) and poll()
Change-Id: Ib9ecb1e5c0c6e2d062b89c25109ec571570eb497
Signed-off-by: Suren Baghdasaryan <[email protected]>
Royna2544 referenced this pull request in Roynas-Android-Playground/android_kernel_samsung_universal8895 May 15, 2023
…g the sock

[ Upstream commit 3cf7203ca620682165706f70a1b12b5194607dce ]

There is a race condition in vxlan that when deleting a vxlan device
during receiving packets, there is a possibility that the sock is
released after getting vxlan_sock vs from sk_user_data. Then in
later vxlan_ecn_decapsulate(), vxlan_get_sk_family() we will got
NULL pointer dereference. e.g.

   #0 [ffffa25ec6978a38] machine_kexec at ffffffff8c669757
   8890q#1 [ffffa25ec6978a90] __crash_kexec at ffffffff8c7c0a4d
   8890q#2 [ffffa25ec6978b58] crash_kexec at ffffffff8c7c1c48
   8890q#3 [ffffa25ec6978b60] oops_end at ffffffff8c627f2b
   8890q#4 [ffffa25ec6978b80] page_fault_oops at ffffffff8c678fcb
   exynos8895#5 [ffffa25ec6978bd8] exc_page_fault at ffffffff8d109542
   exynos8895#6 [ffffa25ec6978c00] asm_exc_page_fault at ffffffff8d200b62
      [exception RIP: vxlan_ecn_decapsulate+0x3b]
      RIP: ffffffffc1014e7b  RSP: ffffa25ec6978cb0  RFLAGS: 00010246
      RAX: 0000000000000008  RBX: ffff8aa000888000  RCX: 0000000000000000
      RDX: 000000000000000e  RSI: ffff8a9fc7ab803e  RDI: ffff8a9fd1168700
      RBP: ffff8a9fc7ab803e   R8: 0000000000700000   R9: 00000000000010ae
      R10: ffff8a9fcb748980  R11: 0000000000000000  R12: ffff8a9fd1168700
      R13: ffff8aa000888000  R14: 00000000002a0000  R15: 00000000000010ae
      ORIG_RAX: ffffffffffffffff  CS: 0010  SS: 0018
   exynos8895#7 [ffffa25ec6978ce8] vxlan_rcv at ffffffffc10189cd [vxlan]
   exynos8895#8 [ffffa25ec6978d90] udp_queue_rcv_one_skb at ffffffff8cfb6507
   exynos8895#9 [ffffa25ec6978dc0] udp_unicast_rcv_skb at ffffffff8cfb6e45
  exynos8895#10 [ffffa25ec6978dc8] __udp4_lib_rcv at ffffffff8cfb8807
  exynos8895#11 [ffffa25ec6978e20] ip_protocol_deliver_rcu at ffffffff8cf76951
  exynos8895#12 [ffffa25ec6978e48] ip_local_deliver at ffffffff8cf76bde
  exynos8895#13 [ffffa25ec6978ea0] __netif_receive_skb_one_core at ffffffff8cecde9b
  exynos8895#14 [ffffa25ec6978ec8] process_backlog at ffffffff8cece139
  exynos8895#15 [ffffa25ec6978f00] __napi_poll at ffffffff8ceced1a
  exynos8895#16 [ffffa25ec6978f28] net_rx_action at ffffffff8cecf1f3
  exynos8895#17 [ffffa25ec6978fa0] __softirqentry_text_start at ffffffff8d4000ca
  exynos8895#18 [ffffa25ec6978ff0] do_softirq at ffffffff8c6fbdc3

Reproducer: https://github.com/Mellanox/ovs-tests/blob/master/test-ovs-vxlan-remove-tunnel-during-traffic.sh

Fix this by waiting for all sk_user_data reader to finish before
releasing the sock.

Reported-by: Jianlin Shi <[email protected]>
Suggested-by: Jakub Sitnicki <[email protected]>
Fixes: 6a93cc9 ("udp-tunnel: Add a few more UDP tunnel APIs")
Signed-off-by: Hangbin Liu <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Jiri Pirko <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Ulrich Hecht <[email protected]>
Royna2544 referenced this pull request in Roynas-Android-Playground/android_kernel_samsung_universal8895 May 15, 2023
[ Upstream commit b18cba09e374637a0a3759d856a6bca94c133952 ]

Commit 9130b8dbc6ac ("SUNRPC: allow for upcalls for the same uid
but different gss service") introduced `auth` argument to
__gss_find_upcall(), but in gss_pipe_downcall() it was left as NULL
since it (and auth->service) was not (yet) determined.

When multiple upcalls with the same uid and different service are
ongoing, it could happen that __gss_find_upcall(), which returns the
first match found in the pipe->in_downcall list, could not find the
correct gss_msg corresponding to the downcall we are looking for.
Moreover, it might return a msg which is not sent to rpc.gssd yet.

We could see mount.nfs process hung in D state with multiple mount.nfs
are executed in parallel.  The call trace below is of CentOS 7.9
kernel-3.10.0-1160.24.1.el7.x86_64 but we observed the same hang w/
elrepo kernel-ml-6.0.7-1.el7.

PID: 71258  TASK: ffff91ebd4be0000  CPU: 36  COMMAND: "mount.nfs"
 #0 [ffff9203ca3234f8] __schedule at ffffffffa3b8899f
 8890q#1 [ffff9203ca323580] schedule at ffffffffa3b88eb9
 8890q#2 [ffff9203ca323590] gss_cred_init at ffffffffc0355818 [auth_rpcgss]
 8890q#3 [ffff9203ca323658] rpcauth_lookup_credcache at ffffffffc0421ebc
[sunrpc]
 8890q#4 [ffff9203ca3236d8] gss_lookup_cred at ffffffffc0353633 [auth_rpcgss]
 exynos8895#5 [ffff9203ca3236e8] rpcauth_lookupcred at ffffffffc0421581 [sunrpc]
 exynos8895#6 [ffff9203ca323740] rpcauth_refreshcred at ffffffffc04223d3 [sunrpc]
 exynos8895#7 [ffff9203ca3237a0] call_refresh at ffffffffc04103dc [sunrpc]
 exynos8895#8 [ffff9203ca3237b8] __rpc_execute at ffffffffc041e1c9 [sunrpc]
 exynos8895#9 [ffff9203ca323820] rpc_execute at ffffffffc0420a48 [sunrpc]

The scenario is like this. Let's say there are two upcalls for
services A and B, A -> B in pipe->in_downcall, B -> A in pipe->pipe.

When rpc.gssd reads pipe to get the upcall msg corresponding to
service B from pipe->pipe and then writes the response, in
gss_pipe_downcall the msg corresponding to service A will be picked
because only uid is used to find the msg and it is before the one for
B in pipe->in_downcall.  And the process waiting for the msg
corresponding to service A will be woken up.

Actual scheduing of that process might be after rpc.gssd processes the
next msg.  In rpc_pipe_generic_upcall it clears msg->errno (for A).
The process is scheduled to see gss_msg->ctx == NULL and
gss_msg->msg.errno == 0, therefore it cannot break the loop in
gss_create_upcall and is never woken up after that.

This patch adds a simple check to ensure that a msg which is not
sent to rpc.gssd yet is not chosen as the matching upcall upon
receiving a downcall.

Signed-off-by: minoura makoto <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Hiroshi Shimamoto <[email protected]>
Tested-by: Hiroshi Shimamoto <[email protected]>
Cc: Trond Myklebust <[email protected]>
Fixes: 9130b8dbc6ac ("SUNRPC: allow for upcalls for same uid but different gss service")
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
[uli: backport to 4.4]
Signed-off-by: Ulrich Hecht <[email protected]>
Royna2544 referenced this pull request in Roynas-Android-Playground/android_kernel_samsung_universal8895 May 15, 2023
[ Upstream commit 6c4ca03bd890566d873e3593b32d034bf2f5a087 ]

During EEH error injection testing, a deadlock was encountered in the tg3
driver when tg3_io_error_detected() was attempting to cancel outstanding
reset tasks:

crash> foreach UN bt
...
PID: 159    TASK: c0000000067c6000  CPU: 8   COMMAND: "eehd"
...
 exynos8895#5 [c00000000681f990] __cancel_work_timer at c00000000019fd18
 exynos8895#6 [c00000000681fa30] tg3_io_error_detected at c00800000295f098 [tg3]
 exynos8895#7 [c00000000681faf0] eeh_report_error at c00000000004e25c
...

PID: 290    TASK: c000000036e5f800  CPU: 6   COMMAND: "kworker/6:1"
...
 8890q#4 [c00000003721fbc0] rtnl_lock at c000000000c940d8
 exynos8895#5 [c00000003721fbe0] tg3_reset_task at c008000002969358 [tg3]
 exynos8895#6 [c00000003721fc60] process_one_work at c00000000019e5c4
...

PID: 296    TASK: c000000037a65800  CPU: 21  COMMAND: "kworker/21:1"
...
 8890q#4 [c000000037247bc0] rtnl_lock at c000000000c940d8
 exynos8895#5 [c000000037247be0] tg3_reset_task at c008000002969358 [tg3]
 exynos8895#6 [c000000037247c60] process_one_work at c00000000019e5c4
...

PID: 655    TASK: c000000036f49000  CPU: 16  COMMAND: "kworker/16:2"
...:1

 8890q#4 [c0000000373ebbc0] rtnl_lock at c000000000c940d8
 exynos8895#5 [c0000000373ebbe0] tg3_reset_task at c008000002969358 [tg3]
 exynos8895#6 [c0000000373ebc60] process_one_work at c00000000019e5c4
...

Code inspection shows that both tg3_io_error_detected() and
tg3_reset_task() attempt to acquire the RTNL lock at the beginning of
their code blocks.  If tg3_reset_task() should happen to execute between
the times when tg3_io_error_deteced() acquires the RTNL lock and
tg3_reset_task_cancel() is called, a deadlock will occur.

Moving tg3_reset_task_cancel() call earlier within the code block, prior
to acquiring RTNL, prevents this from happening, but also exposes another
deadlock issue where tg3_reset_task() may execute AFTER
tg3_io_error_detected() has executed:

crash> foreach UN bt
PID: 159    TASK: c0000000067d2000  CPU: 9   COMMAND: "eehd"
...
 8890q#4 [c000000006867a60] rtnl_lock at c000000000c940d8
 exynos8895#5 [c000000006867a80] tg3_io_slot_reset at c0080000026c2ea8 [tg3]
 exynos8895#6 [c000000006867b00] eeh_report_reset at c00000000004de88
...
PID: 363    TASK: c000000037564000  CPU: 6   COMMAND: "kworker/6:1"
...
 8890q#3 [c000000036c1bb70] msleep at c000000000259e6c
 8890q#4 [c000000036c1bba0] napi_disable at c000000000c6b848
 exynos8895#5 [c000000036c1bbe0] tg3_reset_task at c0080000026d942c [tg3]
 exynos8895#6 [c000000036c1bc60] process_one_work at c00000000019e5c4
...

This issue can be avoided by aborting tg3_reset_task() if EEH error
recovery is already in progress.

Fixes: db84bf4 ("tg3: tg3_reset_task() needs to use rtnl_lock to synchronize")
Signed-off-by: David Christensen <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Pavan Chebbi <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Ulrich Hecht <[email protected]>
Royna2544 referenced this pull request in Roynas-Android-Playground/android_kernel_samsung_universal8895 May 15, 2023
commit 60eed1e3d45045623e46944ebc7c42c30a4350f0 upstream.

code path:

ocfs2_ioctl_move_extents
 ocfs2_move_extents
  ocfs2_defrag_extent
   __ocfs2_move_extent
    + ocfs2_journal_access_di
    + ocfs2_split_extent  //sub-paths call jbd2_journal_restart
    + ocfs2_journal_dirty //crash by jbs2 ASSERT

crash stacks:

PID: 11297  TASK: ffff974a676dcd00  CPU: 67  COMMAND: "defragfs.ocfs2"
 #0 [ffffb25d8dad3900] machine_kexec at ffffffff8386fe01
 8890q#1 [ffffb25d8dad3958] __crash_kexec at ffffffff8395959d
 8890q#2 [ffffb25d8dad3a20] crash_kexec at ffffffff8395a45d
 8890q#3 [ffffb25d8dad3a38] oops_end at ffffffff83836d3f
 8890q#4 [ffffb25d8dad3a58] do_trap at ffffffff83833205
 exynos8895#5 [ffffb25d8dad3aa0] do_invalid_op at ffffffff83833aa6
 exynos8895#6 [ffffb25d8dad3ac0] invalid_op at ffffffff84200d18
    [exception RIP: jbd2_journal_dirty_metadata+0x2ba]
    RIP: ffffffffc09ca54a  RSP: ffffb25d8dad3b70  RFLAGS: 00010207
    RAX: 0000000000000000  RBX: ffff9706eedc5248  RCX: 0000000000000000
    RDX: 0000000000000001  RSI: ffff97337029ea28  RDI: ffff9706eedc5250
    RBP: ffff9703c3520200   R8: 000000000f46b0b2   R9: 0000000000000000
    R10: 0000000000000001  R11: 00000001000000fe  R12: ffff97337029ea28
    R13: 0000000000000000  R14: ffff9703de59bf60  R15: ffff9706eedc5250
    ORIG_RAX: ffffffffffffffff  CS: 0010  SS: 0018
 exynos8895#7 [ffffb25d8dad3ba8] ocfs2_journal_dirty at ffffffffc137fb95 [ocfs2]
 exynos8895#8 [ffffb25d8dad3be8] __ocfs2_move_extent at ffffffffc139a950 [ocfs2]
 exynos8895#9 [ffffb25d8dad3c80] ocfs2_defrag_extent at ffffffffc139b2d2 [ocfs2]

Analysis

This bug has the same root cause of 'commit 7f27ec9 ("ocfs2: call
ocfs2_journal_access_di() before ocfs2_journal_dirty() in
ocfs2_write_end_nolock()")'.  For this bug, jbd2_journal_restart() is
called by ocfs2_split_extent() during defragmenting.

How to fix

For ocfs2_split_extent() can handle journal operations totally by itself.
Caller doesn't need to call journal access/dirty pair, and caller only
needs to call journal start/stop pair.  The fix method is to remove
journal access/dirty from __ocfs2_move_extent().

The discussion for this patch:
https://oss.oracle.com/pipermail/ocfs2-devel/2023-February/000647.html

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Heming Zhao <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Joseph Qi <[email protected]>
Cc: Mark Fasheh <[email protected]>
Cc: Joel Becker <[email protected]>
Cc: Junxiao Bi <[email protected]>
Cc: Changwei Ge <[email protected]>
Cc: Gang He <[email protected]>
Cc: Jun Piao <[email protected]>
Cc: <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Ulrich Hecht <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant