-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.9k
Issues: ethereum/solidity
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Author
Label
Projects
Milestones
Assignee
Sort
Issues list
Convert There is not much implementation work to be done. The task is very easy or tiny.
low impact
Changes are not very noticeable or potential benefits are limited.
must have eventually
Something we consider essential but not enough to prevent us from releasing Solidity 1.0 without it.
verbatim
into a single builtin with literal arguments
breaking change ⚠️
low effort
#15805
opened Jan 31, 2025 by
cameel
Deprecation warnings for features we plan to remove
low effort
There is not much implementation work to be done. The task is very easy or tiny.
medium impact
Default level of impact
selected for development
It's on our short-term development
Disallow internal function pointers in storage
breaking change ⚠️
low effort
There is not much implementation work to be done. The task is very easy or tiny.
low impact
Changes are not very noticeable or potential benefits are limited.
must have
Something we consider an essential part of Solidity 1.0.
Compilation and Optimizer Performance Improvements
selected for development
It's on our short-term development
#15786
opened Jan 27, 2025 by
ekpyron
forge coverage Fails with 'Stack Too Deep' Error When Using --via-ir, While forge test Works Fine
bug 🐛
#15775
opened Jan 25, 2025 by
Blockchain-Oracle
[SMTChecker] SMT logic error occurs when assigning values to fixed-size bytes array
bug 🐛
smt
#15770
opened Jan 24, 2025 by
lum7na
Solc fails to properly generate IR when enabling experimental features
bug 🐛
#15769
opened Jan 24, 2025 by
lum7na
[optimisation] quick win - byte size optimised address mask
feature
#15762
opened Jan 23, 2025 by
radeksvarz
Optimize Issues waiting for more input by the reporter
type(uint256).max
into PUSH0 NOT
feature
optimizer
waiting for more input
#15761
opened Jan 23, 2025 by
radeksvarz
Update Code Examples from Using Web3.js to Ethers.js
documentation 📖
low effort
There is not much implementation work to be done. The task is very easy or tiny.
low impact
Changes are not very noticeable or potential benefits are limited.
must have eventually
Something we consider essential but not enough to prevent us from releasing Solidity 1.0 without it.
#15759
opened Jan 23, 2025 by
codersjj
Inconsistent behavior of There is not much implementation work to be done. The task is very easy or tiny.
low impact
Changes are not very noticeable or potential benefits are limited.
must have eventually
Something we consider essential but not enough to prevent us from releasing Solidity 1.0 without it.
*
and empty string in outputSelection
bug 🐛
low effort
#15747
opened Jan 20, 2025 by
cameel
Do not assemble There is not much implementation work to be done. The task is very easy or tiny.
low impact
Changes are not very noticeable or potential benefits are limited.
performance 🐎
should have
We like the idea but it’s not important enough to be a part of the roadmap.
deployedObject
when not requested
low effort
#15746
opened Jan 20, 2025 by
cameel
deployedBytecode
output is empty in Yul mode for contracts with bytecode dependencies
bug 🐛
low effort
#15745
opened Jan 20, 2025 by
cameel
Document output selection
documentation 📖
low effort
There is not much implementation work to be done. The task is very easy or tiny.
medium impact
Default level of impact
must have eventually
Something we consider essential but not enough to prevent us from releasing Solidity 1.0 without it.
#15744
opened Jan 20, 2025 by
cameel
A shift-right operation sometimes consumes more gas than the equivalent division
bug 🐛
#15743
opened Jan 20, 2025 by
barakman
Requesting implicitly generated outputs
low effort
There is not much implementation work to be done. The task is very easy or tiny.
medium impact
Default level of impact
should have
We like the idea but it’s not important enough to be a part of the roadmap.
#15742
opened Jan 20, 2025 by
cameel
[BUG] Internal compiler error. /solidity/libsolidity/ast/ASTUtils.cpp(56) Recursion depth limit reached
bug 🐛
#15739
opened Jan 20, 2025 by
Jizhou-Chen
[BUG] Internal compiler error /solidity/libsolidity/ast/Types.cpp(1982) Expected detailed error message!
bug 🐛
#15737
opened Jan 20, 2025 by
Jizhou-Chen
[BUG] Assertion failed. /solidity/libsolidity/analysis/TypeChecker.cpp(2344)
bug 🐛
#15735
opened Jan 20, 2025 by
Jizhou-Chen
[BUG] Assertion failed. solidity/libsolidity/analysis/TypeChecker.cpp(2371)
bug 🐛
#15733
opened Jan 20, 2025 by
Jizhou-Chen
[BUG] Assertion failed. solidity/libsolidity/ast/Types.cpp(2284)
bug 🐛
#15732
opened Jan 20, 2025 by
Jizhou-Chen
[BUG] Assertion failed /solidity/libsolidity/ast/Types.h(246)
bug 🐛
#15731
opened Jan 20, 2025 by
Jizhou-Chen
Support for arbitrary contract storage base location
feature
high impact
Changes are very prominent and affect users or the project in a major way.
medium effort
Default level of effort
selected for development
It's on our short-term development
#15727
opened Jan 17, 2025 by
matheusaaguiar
Previous Next
ProTip!
Add no:assignee to see everything that’s not assigned.