Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add EIP: Block-level Warming #9246

Open
wants to merge 4 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Conversation

nerolation
Copy link
Contributor

This EIP proposes to keep accessed addresses and storage keys warm over the duration of a block.

@nerolation nerolation requested a review from eth-bot as a code owner January 15, 2025 17:40
@github-actions github-actions bot added c-new Creates a brand new proposal s-draft This EIP is a Draft t-core labels Jan 15, 2025
@eth-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

eth-bot commented Jan 15, 2025

File EIPS/eip-7863.md

Requires 1 more reviewers from @g11tech, @lightclient, @SamWilsn

@eth-bot eth-bot added e-consensus Waiting on editor consensus e-review Waiting on editor to review labels Jan 15, 2025
@eth-bot eth-bot changed the title Add block-level warming EIP Add EIP: Block-level warming Jan 15, 2025
@github-actions github-actions bot added the w-ci Waiting on CI to pass label Jan 15, 2025
Copy link
Member

@jochem-brouwer jochem-brouwer left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I love this EIP! 😄

I think in general the idea here is that we only charge the cold gas cost once, and this is used to reflect when we pull this storage from disk. If that is the case, then I also propose we remove the logic from 2929 which reverts the journal of warm slots in case a sub-call reverts. This would make the implementation of 2929 for this fork likely much easier (since the revert mechanism does not have to be coded) and we thus now have that cold load costs for an account/slot are at most only charged once per blob.

EIPS/eip-9999.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
EIPS/eip-9999.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
EIPS/eip-9999.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
EIPS/eip-9999.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
EIPS/eip-9999.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
EIPS/eip-9999.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
EIPS/eip-9999.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
EIPS/eip-9999.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
EIPS/eip-9999.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
EIPS/eip-9999.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@eth-bot eth-bot changed the title Add EIP: Block-level warming Add EIP: Block-level Warming Jan 17, 2025
@github-actions github-actions bot removed the w-ci Waiting on CI to pass label Jan 17, 2025
Copy link

The commit df49e2c (as a parent of 0c66ba4) contains errors.
Please inspect the Run Summary for details.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the w-ci Waiting on CI to pass label Jan 17, 2025
@github-actions github-actions bot removed the w-ci Waiting on CI to pass label Jan 18, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
c-new Creates a brand new proposal e-consensus Waiting on editor consensus e-review Waiting on editor to review s-draft This EIP is a Draft t-core
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants