use grafana alloy instead of fluent-bit

[zirain]

• this will make configuration simpler and test run faster
• easier to support IPv6 and Dual

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 65.50%. Comparing base (6f5ae8e) to head (7b6ed87).
Report is 27 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #4525      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   65.72%   65.50%   -0.22%     
==========================================
  Files         211      211              
  Lines       31669    31858     +189     
==========================================
+ Hits        20813    20870      +57     
- Misses       9656     9746      +90     
- Partials     1200     1242      +42     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[zhaohuabing]

Hi @zirain curios why grafana alloy is faster than fluent-bit?

[zhaohuabing]

There are two copies of logs in the loki?

[zirain]

Hi @zirain curios why grafana alloy is faster than fluent-bit?

it's faster on my local cluster.

[arkodg]

I would prefer to keep the more popular one (for users who are using EG or likely to use it) rather than the faster one

[zirain]

I would prefer to keep the more popular one (for users who are using EG or likely to use it) rather than the faster one

I want to bring this back cause I cannot figure out how to make fluent-bit support IPv6 and Dual.