Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

refactor: remove unused code from deserializer #133

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 3, 2024
Merged

Conversation

hw0lff
Copy link
Contributor

@hw0lff hw0lff commented Jul 24, 2024

The TagAccess type from the ciborium::de module seems to be unused.
Only the crate::tag::TagAccess is used.
So I removed it and replaced the qualified path crate::tag::TagAccess with a use import.

Additionally a header pull followed by a push was also removed, since it

  1. didn't forward the decoder in any important way and
  2. the pulled header wasn't actually used.

@hw0lff hw0lff requested a review from a team as a code owner July 24, 2024 23:07
@hw0lff hw0lff requested a review from dpal July 24, 2024 23:07
@rjzak
Copy link
Member

rjzak commented Jul 26, 2024

lgtm. Could you update the commit message to be a conventional commit? Maybe: refactor: remove unused code from deserializer.

@hw0lff hw0lff changed the title Remove unused code from ciborium deserializer module refactor: remove unused code from deserializer Jul 26, 2024
@hw0lff
Copy link
Contributor Author

hw0lff commented Jul 26, 2024

Could you update the commit message to be a conventional commit? Maybe: refactor: remove unused code from deserializer.

Did you mean the title of the PR?
Like it is now?

@rjzak
Copy link
Member

rjzak commented Jul 30, 2024

No, with the commit itself. Could you squash and re-word it, then force-push it back to this branch.
image

@hw0lff
Copy link
Contributor Author

hw0lff commented Aug 2, 2024

Could you squash and re-word it, then force-push it back to this branch.

Done.
Sorry for the misunderstanding.

@rjzak rjzak merged commit 2a06161 into enarx:main Aug 3, 2024
53 of 54 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants