Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

test: contributor page #1900

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 29, 2024
Merged

test: contributor page #1900

merged 1 commit into from
Sep 29, 2024

Conversation

jo-elimu
Copy link
Member

#1896

Purpose

Technical Details

Testing Instructions

Screenshots


Format Checks

Note

Files in PRs are automatically checked for format violations with mvn spotless:check.

If this PR contains files with format violations, run mvn spotless:apply to fix them.

@jo-elimu jo-elimu self-assigned this Sep 29, 2024
@jo-elimu jo-elimu requested a review from a team as a code owner September 29, 2024 12:23
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Sep 29, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes involve modifications to JSP files for the contributor section of the web application, including updates to CSS identifiers and HTML structure. Additionally, new methods and classes have been introduced in the Selenium test suite to enhance interaction with contributor elements on the page. This includes a new method for selecting a random contributor and a new test class for testing the contributor page functionality.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
src/main/webapp/WEB-INF/jsp/contributor/*.jsp Updated cssId in contributor.jsp and added a CSS class in list.jsp.
src/test/java/selenium/contributor/*.java Added pressRandomContributor() method in ContributorListPage, introduced ContributorPage class, and created ContributorPageTest class for testing.

Possibly related PRs

Suggested reviewers

  • vrudas
  • alexander-kuruvilla
  • Souvik-Cyclic
  • nya-elimu

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 29, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 15.05%. Comparing base (8500dea) to head (eb10c8f).
Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##               main    #1900   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage     15.05%   15.05%           
  Complexity      456      456           
=========================================
  Files           249      249           
  Lines          7724     7724           
  Branches        808      808           
=========================================
  Hits           1163     1163           
  Misses         6511     6511           
  Partials         50       50           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 4

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (6)
src/test/java/selenium/contributor/ContributorPage.java (1)

11-17: Constructor implementation looks good, but consider adding exception handling.

The constructor correctly initializes the driver field and performs basic checks to ensure the page has loaded correctly. The call to ErrorHelper.verifyNoScriptOrMarkupError(driver) is a good practice to catch any script or markup errors early.

Consider adding explicit exception handling for potential NoSuchElementException from findElement and any exceptions that might be thrown by verifyNoScriptOrMarkupError. This would make the code more robust and provide clearer error messages. For example:

public ContributorPage(WebDriver driver) {
    this.driver = driver;

    try {
        driver.findElement(By.id("contributorPage"));
        ErrorHelper.verifyNoScriptOrMarkupError(driver);
    } catch (NoSuchElementException e) {
        throw new RuntimeException("Contributor page not loaded correctly", e);
    } catch (Exception e) {
        throw new RuntimeException("Error initializing ContributorPage", e);
    }
}
src/main/webapp/WEB-INF/jsp/contributor/contributor.jsp (1)

Line range hint 15-20: Consider improving tab accessibility

The current tab structure uses color coding to distinguish between tabs. While this works for many users, it may not be sufficient for those with visual impairments.

Consider adding aria labels to improve accessibility. Here's a suggested change:

 <ul class="tabs tabs-transparent deep-purple lighten-1 z-depth-1" style="border-radius: 8px;">
-    <li class="tab"><a class="active" href="#storybooks">Storybooks (${storyBookContributionsCount} + ${storyBookPeerReviewsCount})</a></li>
-    <li class="tab"><a href="#audios">Audios (${audioContributionsCount} + ${audioPeerReviewsCount})</a></li>
-    <li class="tab"><a href="#words">Words (${wordContributionsCount} + ${wordPeerReviewsCount})</a></li>
-    <li class="tab"><a href="#numbers">Numbers (${numberContributionsCount} + ${numberPeerReviewsCount})</a></li>
+    <li class="tab"><a class="active" href="#storybooks" aria-label="Storybooks tab">Storybooks (${storyBookContributionsCount} + ${storyBookPeerReviewsCount})</a></li>
+    <li class="tab"><a href="#audios" aria-label="Audios tab">Audios (${audioContributionsCount} + ${audioPeerReviewsCount})</a></li>
+    <li class="tab"><a href="#words" aria-label="Words tab">Words (${wordContributionsCount} + ${wordPeerReviewsCount})</a></li>
+    <li class="tab"><a href="#numbers" aria-label="Numbers tab">Numbers (${numberContributionsCount} + ${numberPeerReviewsCount})</a></li>
 </ul>

This change adds aria-label attributes to each tab, providing additional context for screen readers and improving the overall accessibility of the page.

src/test/java/selenium/contributor/ContributorPageTest.java (2)

20-37: LGTM: setUp method is well-structured, with a minor suggestion.

The setUp method correctly initializes the WebDriver with configurable headless mode. It's good that you're using a DomainHelper for the base URL.

Consider extracting the headless mode configuration into a separate method for better readability:

 @BeforeEach
 public void setUp() { 
     logger.info("setUp");

     ChromeOptions chromeOptions = new ChromeOptions();
-
-    // Read "headless" property set on the command line: 
-    //    mvn clean verify -P regression-test-ui -D headless=true
-    String headlessSystemProperty = System.getProperty("headless");
-    logger.info("headlessSystemProperty: \"" + headlessSystemProperty + "\"");
-    if ("true".equals(headlessSystemProperty)) {
-        chromeOptions.addArguments("headless");
-    }
+    configureHeadlessMode(chromeOptions);
     
     driver = new ChromeDriver(chromeOptions);

     driver.get(DomainHelper.getBaseUrl() + "/contributor/list");
 }

+private void configureHeadlessMode(ChromeOptions chromeOptions) {
+    // Read "headless" property set on the command line: 
+    //    mvn clean verify -P regression-test-ui -D headless=true
+    String headlessSystemProperty = System.getProperty("headless");
+    logger.info("headlessSystemProperty: \"" + headlessSystemProperty + "\"");
+    if ("true".equals(headlessSystemProperty)) {
+        chromeOptions.addArguments("headless");
+    }
+}

1-55: Overall good structure, but improve test coverage and add assertions.

The ContributorPageTest class has a good foundation with proper setup and teardown methods. However, to make this test more valuable:

  1. Add assertions to the testContributorPage method to verify the expected behavior.
  2. Consider adding more test methods to cover different scenarios or edge cases.
  3. Implement error handling and logging for potential failures during the test execution.

To improve the overall test architecture:

  1. Create a base test class that handles common setup and teardown operations. This will make it easier to add more test classes in the future.
  2. Consider implementing a Page Object Model pattern more thoroughly, encapsulating page-specific operations and selectors in the respective page classes.
  3. If not already present, create a test configuration file to manage environment-specific settings (e.g., URLs, timeouts) to make the tests more maintainable across different environments.
src/main/webapp/WEB-INF/jsp/contributor/list.jsp (2)

25-25: LGTM! Consider adding a comment for clarity.

The addition of the contributorCardImageLink class to the anchor tag is a good way to provide more specific styling options for this element. This change doesn't affect the functionality and is consistent with good front-end practices.

Consider adding a brief comment explaining the purpose of this class, especially if it's tied to specific CSS rules. This can help other developers understand the styling intentions. For example:

<%-- Add specific styling for contributor card image links --%>
<a class="contributorCardImageLink" href="<spring:url value='/contributor/${contributor.id}' />">

Line range hint 1-138: Consider improving code organization for better maintainability.

While the current implementation works well, there are a few suggestions that could enhance the overall structure and maintainability of the code:

  1. JavaScript Separation: Consider moving the inline JavaScript (especially the token balance calculation) to a separate .js file. This separation of concerns can make the code easier to maintain and debug.

  2. CSS Classes: The addition of the contributorCardImageLink class is a good step. Consider reviewing other elements in the file for opportunities to add meaningful class names, which can make styling and future modifications easier.

  3. Localization: Ensure all user-facing strings are properly localized using <fmt:message> tags, if not already done.

  4. Accessibility: Review the HTML structure to ensure it meets accessibility standards, particularly for screen readers (e.g., proper use of ARIA attributes where necessary).

  5. Error Handling: Consider adding error handling for the token balance calculation to gracefully handle potential API failures.

These suggestions aim to improve the long-term maintainability and scalability of the code. Would you like me to provide more specific examples for any of these points?

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 8500dea and eb10c8f.

📒 Files selected for processing (6)
  • src/main/webapp/WEB-INF/jsp/contributor/contributor.jsp (1 hunks)
  • src/main/webapp/WEB-INF/jsp/contributor/list.jsp (1 hunks)
  • src/test/java/selenium/contributor/ContributorListPage.java (2 hunks)
  • src/test/java/selenium/contributor/ContributorListPageTest.java (1 hunks)
  • src/test/java/selenium/contributor/ContributorPage.java (1 hunks)
  • src/test/java/selenium/contributor/ContributorPageTest.java (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (9)
src/test/java/selenium/contributor/ContributorPage.java (2)

1-6: LGTM: Package declaration and imports are appropriate.

The package declaration and imports are well-structured and relevant for a Selenium WebDriver test class focused on the contributor page.


7-10: LGTM: Class declaration is appropriate.

The ContributorPage class is well-named and follows Java naming conventions. Its purpose is clear from the name, and it's appropriate for it to be a standalone class at this point.

src/test/java/selenium/contributor/ContributorListPage.java (3)

3-6: LGTM: New imports are appropriate.

The added imports for java.util.List and Apache Log4j are necessary and correctly placed for the new functionality in the class.


15-16: LGTM: Logger addition enhances debugging capabilities.

The addition of a private logger instance is a good practice for improved debugging and tracing in test classes.


Line range hint 1-34: Overall, the changes align with the PR objectives but lack context.

The additions to the ContributorListPage class introduce functionality to randomly select a contributor, which aligns with the PR's focus on the contributor page. However, without more context about issue #1896 or specific testing instructions, it's challenging to fully assess how these changes address the PR's objectives.

To improve the PR:

  1. Provide more details about the specific issue being addressed.
  2. Include testing instructions to help reviewers verify the new functionality.
  3. Consider adding comments to the code explaining the purpose of the pressRandomContributor() method in the context of the tests being performed.

To gather more context about the related issue, you can run:

This will help in understanding how the current changes relate to the issue being addressed.

✅ Verification successful

The changes in ContributorListPage.java effectively implement the functionality required by issue #1896 by introducing a method to randomly select a contributor. This aligns with the objective of enhancing the contributor page after moving the contributors list to /contributor/list.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Fetch details about the related issue
gh issue view 1896

Length of output: 364

src/main/webapp/WEB-INF/jsp/contributor/contributor.jsp (1)

12-12: LGTM! Verify CSS and JS dependencies.

The change from contributorStoryBooksPage to contributorPage as the cssId is appropriate and aligns better with the overall content of the page. This new ID is more generic and accurately represents the page's diverse content (storybooks, audios, words, and numbers).

To ensure this change doesn't break any existing styles or functionality, please run the following script to check for any references to the old ID:

If any results are found, make sure to update those references to use the new ID contributorPage.

src/test/java/selenium/contributor/ContributorPageTest.java (3)

1-13: LGTM: Import statements are appropriate.

The import statements include all necessary libraries for Selenium testing, JUnit, and logging. The custom DomainHelper import suggests good separation of concerns for domain-specific utilities.


14-18: LGTM: Class declaration and field initialization are correct.

The class name ContributorPageTest follows the convention for test classes. The logger and WebDriver field are appropriately declared.


39-44: LGTM: tearDown method is correct and follows best practices.

The tearDown method properly closes the WebDriver and logs the action, which is essential for clean test execution and debugging.

Comment on lines +7 to +18
public class ContributorPage {

private WebDriver driver;

public ContributorPage(WebDriver driver) {
this.driver = driver;

driver.findElement(By.id("contributorPage"));

ErrorHelper.verifyNoScriptOrMarkupError(driver);
}
}
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Consider adding methods for page interactions.

The ContributorPage class provides a good foundation, but it currently lacks methods for interacting with elements on the contributor page. To make this class more useful for testing, consider adding methods that represent actions a user might take on the contributor page.

Here are some suggestions for methods you might want to add:

public void enterContributorName(String name) {
    // Implementation to find and fill in a name field
}

public void selectContributorType(String type) {
    // Implementation to select a contributor type from a dropdown
}

public void submitContributorForm() {
    // Implementation to submit the contributor form
}

public boolean isSuccessMessageDisplayed() {
    // Implementation to check if a success message is displayed after form submission
}

These are just examples; the actual methods would depend on the specific functionality of your contributor page.

Comment on lines +27 to +34
public void pressRandomContributor() {
List<WebElement> contributorLinks = driver.findElements(By.className("contributorCardImageLink"));
logger.info("contributorLinks.size(): " + contributorLinks.size());
int randomIndex = (int) (Math.random() * contributorLinks.size());
logger.info("randomIndex: " + randomIndex);
WebElement contributorLink = contributorLinks.get(randomIndex);
contributorLink.click();
}
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Consider handling edge cases and adding explicit waits.

The pressRandomContributor() method looks good overall, but there are a few points to consider:

  1. Handle the case where no contributor links are found to avoid potential IndexOutOfBoundsException.
  2. Add an explicit wait for the elements to be clickable to prevent race conditions.
  3. Consider using ThreadLocalRandom instead of Math.random() for better performance in concurrent scenarios.

Here's a suggested improvement:

import org.openqa.selenium.support.ui.ExpectedConditions;
import org.openqa.selenium.support.ui.WebDriverWait;
import java.time.Duration;
import java.util.concurrent.ThreadLocalRandom;

public void pressRandomContributor() {
    WebDriverWait wait = new WebDriverWait(driver, Duration.ofSeconds(10));
    List<WebElement> contributorLinks = wait.until(ExpectedConditions.presenceOfAllElementsLocatedBy(By.className("contributorCardImageLink")));
    
    logger.info("contributorLinks.size(): " + contributorLinks.size());
    
    if (contributorLinks.isEmpty()) {
        logger.warn("No contributor links found on the page.");
        return;
    }
    
    int randomIndex = ThreadLocalRandom.current().nextInt(contributorLinks.size());
    logger.info("randomIndex: " + randomIndex);
    
    WebElement contributorLink = contributorLinks.get(randomIndex);
    wait.until(ExpectedConditions.elementToBeClickable(contributorLink)).click();
}

This version includes error handling, explicit waits, and uses ThreadLocalRandom for better performance.

Comment on lines +51 to +53
contributorListPage.pressRandomContributor();

ContributorPage contributorPage = new ContributorPage(driver);
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codebase verification

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Required methods are not implemented

The methods pressRandomContributor(), isPageLoaded(), and getContributorName() referenced in your test changes are not implemented in the ContributorListPage and ContributorPage classes. Please ensure these methods are defined to support the updated test functionality.

🔗 Analysis chain

Enhance test with assertions and error handling

The addition of pressRandomContributor() and the creation of a ContributorPage instance improve the test by simulating user interaction and page navigation. However, the test could be further improved:

  1. Add assertions to verify that the navigation to the contributor page was successful.
  2. Implement error handling to manage cases where no contributors are available.
  3. Consider verifying that the correct contributor page was loaded after the random selection.

Here's a suggested improvement:

ContributorListPage contributorListPage = new ContributorListPage(driver);
String selectedContributorName = contributorListPage.pressRandomContributor();
assertNotNull(selectedContributorName, "No contributor was selected");

ContributorPage contributorPage = new ContributorPage(driver);
assertTrue(contributorPage.isPageLoaded(), "Contributor page did not load");
assertEquals(selectedContributorName, contributorPage.getContributorName(), "Incorrect contributor page loaded");

This assumes that you modify pressRandomContributor() to return the name of the selected contributor, and add methods isPageLoaded() and getContributorName() to the ContributorPage class.

To ensure that the ContributorListPage and ContributorPage classes have the necessary methods, let's verify their implementations:

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for the implementation of required methods in ContributorListPage and ContributorPage

echo "Checking ContributorListPage implementation:"
ast-grep --lang java --pattern $'class ContributorListPage {
  $$$
  String pressRandomContributor() {
    $$$
  }
  $$$
}'

echo "Checking ContributorPage implementation:"
ast-grep --lang java --pattern $'class ContributorPage {
  $$$
  boolean isPageLoaded() {
    $$$
  }
  $$$
  String getContributorName() {
    $$$
  }
  $$$
}'

Length of output: 476

Comment on lines +46 to +54
@Test
public void testContributorPage() {
logger.info("testContributorPage");

ContributorListPage contributorListPage = new ContributorListPage(driver);
contributorListPage.pressRandomContributor();

ContributorPage contributorPage = new ContributorPage(driver);
}
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Add assertions to verify expected behavior.

The test method structure is good, but it currently lacks assertions to verify the expected behavior after pressing a random contributor.

Consider adding assertions to validate the state of the ContributorPage after navigation. For example:

@Test
public void testContributorPage() {
    logger.info("testContributorPage");
    
    ContributorListPage contributorListPage = new ContributorListPage(driver);
    String selectedContributorName = contributorListPage.pressRandomContributor();

    ContributorPage contributorPage = new ContributorPage(driver);
    assertTrue(contributorPage.isLoaded(), "Contributor page should be loaded");
    assertEquals(selectedContributorName, contributorPage.getContributorName(), "Contributor name should match selected contributor");
    // Add more assertions to verify other elements on the ContributorPage
}

Make sure to implement the necessary methods in the ContributorListPage and ContributorPage classes to support these assertions.

@nya-elimu nya-elimu merged commit 1fefa7d into main Sep 29, 2024
13 of 14 checks passed
@nya-elimu nya-elimu deleted the 1896-ui-test branch September 29, 2024 13:33
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants