fix: Delete device profile in use should return 409

[jinlinGuan]

close #4937

If your build fails due to your commit message not passing the build checks, please review the guidelines here: https://github.com/edgexfoundry/edgex-go/blob/main/.github/Contributing.md

PR Checklist

Please check if your PR fulfills the following requirements:

• I am not introducing a breaking change (if you are, flag in conventional commit message with BREAKING CHANGE: describing the break)
• I am not introducing a new dependency (add notes below if you are)
• I have added unit tests for the new feature or bug fix (if not, why?)
• I have fully tested (add details below) this the new feature or bug fix (if not, why?)
• I have opened a PR for the related docs change (if not, why?)

Testing Instructions

New Dependency Instructions (If applicable)

[codecov-commenter]

⚠️ Please install the to ensure uploads and comments are reliably processed by Codecov.

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 0% with 20 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 31.81%. Comparing base (77e0adc) to head (d76678a).

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
...nternal/core/metadata/application/deviceprofile.go	0.00%	10 Missing ⚠️
...nternal/core/metadata/application/deviceservice.go	0.00%	10 Missing ⚠️

❗ Your organization needs to install the Codecov GitHub app to enable full functionality.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #4941      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   31.86%   31.81%   -0.06%     
==========================================
  Files         265      265              
  Lines       19318    19338      +20     
==========================================
- Hits         6156     6152       -4     
- Misses      11770    11792      +22     
- Partials     1392     1394       +2     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[cloudxxx8]

LGTM

[cloudxxx8]

try to move the check logic to the application layer

[cloudxxx8]

please add the mock functions for
dbClient.DeviceCountByProfileName and ProvisionWatcherCountByProfileName
also add two new test cases for these new scenarios

[sonarcloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarCloud

[cloudxxx8]

LGTM