Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Change Rust protobufs crate name, license reference #2541

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

v0-e
Copy link
Contributor

@v0-e v0-e commented Oct 25, 2024

Changelist

Final changes before crate publishing:

  • crate name change to: dydx-proto-rust,
  • license value change to: LicenseRef-dYdX-Custom, following SPDX rules. Clarified in deny.toml.

Test Plan

[Describe how this PR was tested (if applicable)]

Author/Reviewer Checklist

  • If this PR has changes that result in a different app state given the same prior state and transaction list, manually add the state-breaking label.
  • If the PR has breaking postgres changes to the indexer add the indexer-postgres-breaking label.
  • If this PR isn't state-breaking but has changes that modify behavior in PrepareProposal or ProcessProposal, manually add the label proposal-breaking.
  • If this PR is one of many that implement a specific feature, manually label them all feature:[feature-name].
  • If you wish to for mergify-bot to automatically create a PR to backport your change to a release branch, manually add the label backport/[branch-name].
  • Manually add any of the following labels: refactor, chore, bug.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • The package has been renamed to "dydx-proto-rust" with a new description: "Compiled dYdX protobuf files."
    • A new LICENSE file has been added, outlining usage rights and obligations under the GNU AGPL Version 3.
  • Documentation

    • Updated README to reflect the new package name and its dependencies.
  • Chores

    • Configuration changes made to the deny.toml file to accommodate the new license and clarify licensing details.

@v0-e v0-e requested a review from a team as a code owner October 25, 2024 20:12
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 25, 2024

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces several changes primarily to the Cargo.toml, LICENSE, and README.md files of the Rust package. The package name has been updated from "v4-proto-rs" to "dydx-proto-rust," accompanied by a new description and an updated repository URL. The license has also been changed to a custom license type. Additionally, a new LICENSE file has been added, detailing the terms of use under the AGPL. The README file reflects the new package name in its dependency section, and the deny.toml file has been updated to accommodate the new license.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
v4-proto-rs/Cargo.toml Package name changed to dydx-proto-rust, description added, repository URL updated, license changed to LicenseRef-dYdX-Custom.
v4-proto-rs/LICENSE New file added detailing the terms of use under AGPL v3, including rights, obligations, and liability limitations.
v4-proto-rs/README.md Dependency name updated from v4-proto-rs = "0.1" to dydx-proto-rust = "0.1".
v4-proto-rs/deny.toml New license added to [licenses], clarification entry for dydx-proto-rust added, and empty list for bitbucket added in [sources.allow-org].

Poem

In the garden where code does bloom,
A name change brightens the room.
Dydx-proto-rust takes the stage,
With a license that sets the page.
Hop along, let’s code and play,
For open source is here to stay! 🐇✨


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between ad799f6 and b106a5e.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • v4-proto-rs/Cargo.toml (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • v4-proto-rs/Cargo.toml

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
v4-proto-rs/Cargo.toml (1)

5-6: Consider using a more specific repository URL.

While the current repository URL is correct, consider pointing to the specific directory within the v4-chain repository where this crate resides for better discoverability.

-repository = "https://github.com/dydxprotocol/v4-chain"
+repository = "https://github.com/dydxprotocol/v4-chain/tree/main/v4-proto-rs"
v4-proto-rs/README.md (2)

Line range hint 1-100: Consider enhancing the documentation.

While the core content is good, consider adding these improvements to make the documentation more complete:

  1. Add a version badge to show the latest published version
  2. Add an example showing how to use the protobuf types
  3. Document the SPDX license identifier LicenseRef-dYdX-Custom and what it means for users

Example version badge:

[![Crates.io](https://img.shields.io/crates/v/dydx-proto-rust.svg)](https://crates.io/crates/dydx-proto-rust)

Would you like me to provide a complete example of these documentation improvements?


The directory should be renamed to match the crate name dydx-proto-rust

The verification confirms that while the crate has been renamed to dydx-proto-rust in the package configuration files (Cargo.toml, deny.toml), the directory structure still uses the old name v4-proto-rs. This inconsistency should be addressed by renaming the directory to match the new crate name.

  • v4-proto-rs/ directory should be renamed to dydx-proto-rust/
  • The following files need to be moved:
    • v4-proto-rs/README.md
    • v4-proto-rs/deny.toml
    • v4-proto-rs/Cargo.toml
🔗 Analysis chain

Line range hint 1-1: Update the README location to match the new crate name.

The README is still located in the v4-proto-rs directory, but the crate has been renamed to dydx-proto-rust. Consider moving this file to match the new crate name.

Let's verify if there are any other references to the old name in the repository:

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for any remaining references to the old crate name
rg "v4-proto-rs" --type-not git

Length of output: 59


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for any remaining references to the old crate name without the git type exclusion
rg "v4-proto-rs"

# Also search for the new crate name to understand the context
rg "dydx-proto-rust"

# List all README files to understand the directory structure
fd "README.md"

Length of output: 1303

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 317a74e and ad799f6.

📒 Files selected for processing (4)
  • v4-proto-rs/Cargo.toml (1 hunks)
  • v4-proto-rs/LICENSE (1 hunks)
  • v4-proto-rs/README.md (1 hunks)
  • v4-proto-rs/deny.toml (2 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • v4-proto-rs/LICENSE
🔇 Additional comments (6)
v4-proto-rs/Cargo.toml (2)

7-7: Verify license file and documentation.

The license identifier follows SPDX format for custom licenses. However, we should ensure proper documentation is in place.

#!/bin/bash
# Check for LICENSE file
if [ -f "LICENSE" ]; then
    echo "✓ LICENSE file exists"
else
    echo "⚠ LICENSE file missing"
fi

# Check for license documentation in README
if grep -q "LicenseRef-dYdX-Custom" README.md; then
    echo "✓ License documented in README"
else
    echo "⚠ Consider documenting the custom license in README.md"
fi

2-2: Verify package name availability on crates.io.

The new name dydx-proto-rust is more descriptive and follows Rust naming conventions. However, since this is preparation for publishing, we should verify the name availability.

✅ Verification successful

✓ Package name dydx-proto-rust is available on crates.io

The new package name follows Rust naming conventions and is currently available on crates.io. The name change is appropriate for publishing and aligns well with the organization's branding.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check if the crate name is already taken on crates.io
curl -s https://crates.io/api/v1/crates/dydx-proto-rust | grep -q "errors"
if [ $? -eq 0 ]; then
    echo "✓ Crate name 'dydx-proto-rust' is available"
else
    echo "⚠ Crate name 'dydx-proto-rust' is already taken"
fi

Length of output: 235


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Retry the crates.io check with better error handling
response=$(curl -s https://crates.io/api/v1/crates/dydx-proto-rust)
if echo "$response" | jq -e '.errors' >/dev/null 2>&1; then
    if echo "$response" | jq -e '.errors[] | select(.detail | contains("Not Found"))' >/dev/null 2>&1; then
        echo "✓ Crate name 'dydx-proto-rust' is available"
    else
        echo "⚠ Error checking crate name: $(echo "$response" | jq -r '.errors[0].detail')"
    fi
else
    echo "⚠ Crate name 'dydx-proto-rust' is already taken"
    echo "Details: $(echo "$response" | jq -r '.crate.description // "No description"')"
fi

Length of output: 611

v4-proto-rs/deny.toml (3)

28-28: LGTM: Custom license follows SPDX format

The addition of "LicenseRef-dYdX-Custom" to the allowed licenses list follows the SPDX specification for custom licenses.


64-64: LGTM: Explicit source configuration

The addition of bitbucket = [] makes the source configuration more explicit by clearly indicating that no Bitbucket repositories are allowed.


33-39: Verify LICENSE file hash

The license clarification block is well-structured, but please verify that the LICENSE file hash (0x30bcd1e3) matches the actual file content.

v4-proto-rs/README.md (1)

9-9: LGTM: Dependency name updated correctly.

The dependency name has been updated to match the new crate name dydx-proto-rust.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants