fix: Adding OTEL_EXPORTER_OTLP_ENDPOINT #189
Conversation
WalkthroughThis pull request introduces several updates across multiple configuration files and service definitions. Key changes include modifications to the Next.js configuration to streamline external packages, updates to Docker Compose files to enhance service definitions and versioning, the introduction of an OpenTelemetry Collector configuration, and adjustments to package dependencies for improved observability. The changes also reflect updates in the Dockerfile for the web service to enhance dependency management. Overall, the modifications focus on refining the setup and configuration of the application and its dependencies. Changes
Possibly related PRs
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
apps/webservice/src/env.ts(1 hunks)apps/webservice/src/instrumentation.node.ts(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
apps/webservice/src/env.ts (2)
27-27: LGTM! Improved validation for sampling ratio.
The enhanced validation ensures the sampling ratio is always between 0 and 1, which is correct as sampling ratios must be within this range. The addition of coerce is helpful for handling string inputs from environment variables.
28-30: LGTM! Verify collector endpoint availability.
The addition of OTEL_EXPORTER_OTLP_ENDPOINT follows OpenTelemetry's standard environment variable naming and uses the correct default port (4318) for OTLP/HTTP.
Let's verify if there are any other OpenTelemetry environment variables that might need similar updates:
✅ Verification successful
OpenTelemetry configuration is properly set up and consistent
The verification shows that:
- All OpenTelemetry environment variables (
OTEL_SAMPLER_RATIOandOTEL_EXPORTER_OTLP_ENDPOINT) are properly defined inenv.tsand used ininstrumentation.node.ts - The configuration follows OpenTelemetry's best practices with proper imports and instrumentation setup
- No inconsistencies or missing configurations were found
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for other potential OpenTelemetry-related environment variables
# that might need similar updates for consistency
# Look for OTEL_ prefixed variables
rg "OTEL_" --type ts
# Look for OpenTelemetry-related configuration
rg "opentelemetry|otlp|trace" --type ts
Length of output: 1935
apps/webservice/src/instrumentation.node.ts (1)
18-25:
Enhance security and reliability of the OTLP exporter configuration.
The current implementation could benefit from additional security measures and improved error handling:
- The URL should be validated at runtime
- HTTPS should be enforced in production environments
- The default localhost endpoint might not be suitable for all environments
Consider applying these improvements:
spanProcessors: [
new BatchSpanProcessor(
new OTLPTraceExporter({
- url:
- env.OTEL_EXPORTER_OTLP_ENDPOINT || "http://localhost:4318/v1/traces",
+ url: (() => {
+ const endpoint = env.OTEL_EXPORTER_OTLP_ENDPOINT ||
+ (env.NODE_ENV === "production"
+ ? undefined
+ : "http://localhost:4318/v1/traces");
+
+ if (!endpoint) {
+ throw new Error("OTEL_EXPORTER_OTLP_ENDPOINT is required in production");
+ }
+
+ try {
+ const url = new URL(endpoint);
+ if (env.NODE_ENV === "production" && url.protocol !== "https:") {
+ throw new Error("HTTPS is required for OTLP endpoint in production");
+ }
+ return endpoint;
+ } catch (error) {
+ throw new Error(`Invalid OTLP endpoint URL: ${error.message}`);
+ }
+ })(),
}),
),
],Let's verify the current endpoint configuration across different environments:
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 7
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (6)
apps/webservice/next.config.js (1)
40-41: Enhance the comment to be more descriptive.The current comment "This is for tracing:" is vague. Consider providing more context about why TLS needs to be disabled for client-side builds and its relationship with tracing.
- // This is for tracing: + // Disable TLS module for client-side builds to prevent issues with OpenTelemetry in browser environmentsdocker-compose.yaml (4)
39-43: Consider using build configuration for local developmentThe commented build configuration suggests local development setup. Consider moving this to docker-compose.dev.yaml to keep the production configuration clean.
69-71: Standardize environment variable formatThe POSTGRES_URL is wrapped in quotes while other variables aren't. Maintain consistency in environment variable formatting.
- POSTGRES_URL: "postgres://ctrlplane:ctrlplane@postgres:5432/ctrlplane" - REDIS_URL: "redis://redis:6379" + POSTGRES_URL: postgres://ctrlplane:ctrlplane@postgres:5432/ctrlplane + REDIS_URL: redis://redis:6379🧰 Tools
🪛 Gitleaks
71-71: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
87-99: Document OpenTelemetry Collector ConfigurationThe commented otel-collector service configuration is well-structured but lacks documentation about its purpose and deployment requirements.
Consider adding a comment block explaining:
- When to uncomment this service
- Prerequisites for enabling OpenTelemetry collection
- The purpose of each exposed port
53-53: Architecture Advice: Service Configuration ManagementMultiple services share common configuration values (POSTGRES_URL, REDIS_URL). Consider implementing a more maintainable configuration management approach.
Recommendations:
- Use Docker configs for shared non-sensitive values
- Implement service discovery instead of hardcoding URLs
- Consider using environment variable substitution with a .env file
Also applies to: 69-71, 80-82
github/get-job-inputs/index.js (1)
28302-28358: Consider adding validation for the target model.While the implementation is generally good, consider adding validation for:
- Version format (if there's a specific format requirement)
- Config structure (if there's a schema)
- Metadata structure (if there are constraints)
Example validation in the instance check:
function instanceOfGetTarget200Response(value) { if (!("id" in value) || value["id"] === void 0) return false; if (!("name" in value) || value["name"] === void 0) return false; if (!("workspaceId" in value) || value["workspaceId"] === void 0) return false; if (!("kind" in value) || value["kind"] === void 0) return false; if (!("identifier" in value) || value["identifier"] === void 0) return false; if (!("version" in value) || value["version"] === void 0) return false; if (!("config" in value) || value["config"] === void 0) return false; + // Validate version format if required + if (typeof value.version === 'string' && !/^\d+\.\d+\.\d+$/.test(value.version)) return false; + // Validate config is an object if required + if (typeof value.config !== 'object') return false; return true; }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
pnpm-lock.yamlis excluded by!**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (9)
apps/webservice/next.config.js(1 hunks)apps/webservice/src/instrumentation.node.ts(1 hunks)apps/webservice/src/trpc/server.ts(1 hunks)docker-compose.dev.yaml(1 hunks)docker-compose.yaml(3 hunks)github/get-job-inputs/index.js(25 hunks)otel-collector-config.yaml(1 hunks)packages/logger/package.json(1 hunks)packages/logger/src/index.ts(2 hunks)
🔥 Files not summarized due to errors (1)
- github/get-job-inputs/index.js: Error: Server error: no LLM provider could handle the message
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- docker-compose.dev.yaml
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- apps/webservice/src/instrumentation.node.ts
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Gitleaks
docker-compose.yaml
56-56: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
71-71: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
82-82: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
🔇 Additional comments (11)
apps/webservice/src/trpc/server.ts (1)
7-7: LGTM!
The import statement is well-placed and follows the separation of concerns principle by keeping instrumentation setup separate from business logic.
packages/logger/package.json (2)
23-23: Verify OpenTelemetry transport configuration.
Since this transport is being added for observability, ensure that the OTLP endpoint environment variable (OTEL_EXPORTER_OTLP_ENDPOINT) mentioned in the PR title is properly configured in the logger implementation.
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the transport configuration in the logger implementation
# Test: Check if the OTEL endpoint is properly configured
rg -A 5 "OpenTelemetryTransportV3|OTEL_EXPORTER_OTLP_ENDPOINT" packages/logger/src/23-23: Consider pinning the OpenTelemetry transport version.
Since this is a pre-1.0 package, minor updates could introduce breaking changes. Consider pinning to an exact version for better stability.
packages/logger/src/index.ts (2)
2-2: LGTM!
The OpenTelemetry Winston transport is correctly imported.
30-33:
Consider adding configuration and error handling for OpenTelemetry transport.
The OpenTelemetry transport is added unconditionally without configuration or error handling. Consider the following improvements:
- Make the transport conditional based on environment configuration
- Add proper configuration using OTEL_EXPORTER_OTLP_ENDPOINT
- Add error handling for transport initialization
Here's a suggested implementation:
transports: [
new winston.transports.Console(),
- new OpenTelemetryTransportV3(),
+ ...(process.env.OTEL_EXPORTER_OTLP_ENDPOINT ? [
+ new OpenTelemetryTransportV3({
+ // Add configuration options if needed
+ }).on('error', (error) => {
+ console.error('OpenTelemetry transport error:', error);
+ })
+ ] : []),
],Let's verify if OTEL_EXPORTER_OTLP_ENDPOINT is properly set in the environment:
✅ Verification successful
OpenTelemetry transport configuration should be aligned with existing environment setup
The codebase already has OpenTelemetry configuration in docker-compose.yaml with OTEL_EXPORTER_OTLP_ENDPOINT set to "http://otel-collector:4318". The suggested changes should be modified to align with this existing setup:
- The transport should be initialized conditionally based on the existing environment variable
- The current implementation in
docker-compose.yamlshows this is a development setup with a local collector - The transport configuration should be kept simple as it's already configured via environment variables
transports: [
new winston.transports.Console(),
- new OpenTelemetryTransportV3(),
+ ...(process.env.OTEL_EXPORTER_OTLP_ENDPOINT ? [
+ new OpenTelemetryTransportV3().on('error', (error) => {
+ console.error('OpenTelemetry transport error:', error);
+ })
+ ] : []),
],🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if OTEL_EXPORTER_OTLP_ENDPOINT is set in docker compose files
echo "Checking docker compose files for OTEL_EXPORTER_OTLP_ENDPOINT:"
rg "OTEL_EXPORTER_OTLP_ENDPOINT" -A 2 "docker-compose*.y*ml"
Length of output: 256
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check for environment configuration files and deployment manifests
echo "Checking for environment configuration and deployment files:"
fd -e env -e yaml -e yml -e json
# Check if OpenTelemetryTransportV3 is used elsewhere in the codebase
echo -e "\nChecking OpenTelemetryTransportV3 usage:"
rg "OpenTelemetryTransportV3" -A 2
# Check for any OTEL environment variables in the codebase
echo -e "\nChecking for OTEL environment variables:"
rg "OTEL_" -A 2
Length of output: 4749
otel-collector-config.yaml (1)
8-12: Security and Performance Considerations
-
The debug exporter with detailed verbosity might impact performance in production. Consider using conditional configuration based on environment.
-
The Prometheus endpoint is exposed on 0.0.0.0, which makes it accessible from any network interface. Consider restricting this to localhost or internal network ranges if metrics should not be publicly accessible.
Run this script to check if there are any security measures (like network policies or ingress rules) protecting the Prometheus endpoint:
apps/webservice/next.config.js (1)
41-48: LGTM! Verify OpenTelemetry functionality.
The webpack configuration correctly disables the TLS module for client-side builds. However, let's verify that this doesn't affect the OpenTelemetry trace export functionality.
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information about the OpenTelemetry configuration to ensure it's properly set up with the webpack changes.
OpenTelemetry configuration is compatible with TLS disabling
The verification shows that OpenTelemetry is properly configured using HTTP-based trace export (OTLPTraceExporter from @opentelemetry/exporter-trace-otlp-http) and the collector endpoint is set to use HTTP protocol (http://otel-collector:4318). The TLS disabling in webpack configuration won't affect the tracing functionality as:
- No direct TLS usage found in instrumentation files
- Using HTTP-based exporter instead of gRPC
- Collector endpoint configured to use HTTP protocol
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that OpenTelemetry configuration is consistent with TLS disabling
# Check for any direct TLS usage in OpenTelemetry related files
echo "Checking for direct TLS usage in OpenTelemetry files..."
rg -l "require\('tls'\)|import.*from.*'tls'" $(fd -g "**/instrumentation*.{ts,js}")
# Check OpenTelemetry endpoint configuration
echo "Checking OpenTelemetry endpoint configuration..."
rg "OTEL_EXPORTER_OTLP_ENDPOINT" $(fd -g "**/docker-compose*.{yml,yaml}")
Length of output: 610
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check OpenTelemetry instrumentation files content
echo "Checking OpenTelemetry instrumentation configuration..."
rg -A 5 "export default.*configure" apps/webservice/src/instrumentation.ts apps/webservice/src/instrumentation.node.ts
# Check if there are any other TLS-related configurations
echo "Checking for TLS-related configurations in the project..."
rg -l "proto|grpc|https" $(fd -g "**/instrumentation*.{ts,js}")
# Check for any OpenTelemetry exporter configurations
echo "Checking OpenTelemetry exporter configurations..."
rg "OTLPTrace.*Exporter|getNodeAutoInstrumentations" apps/webservice/src/instrumentation.node.ts apps/webservice/src/instrumentation.ts
Length of output: 1207
docker-compose.yaml (1)
1-1: LGTM: Docker Compose version upgrade
The upgrade to version "3.9" is appropriate and maintains compatibility with the services defined.
github/get-job-inputs/index.js (3)
28273-28300: LGTM: Target provider model implementation is well-structured.
The implementation follows best practices with proper type checking, JSON serialization/deserialization, and handling of optional fields.
28896-28934: LGTM: Get target endpoint implementation is secure and robust.
The implementation includes:
- Required parameter validation
- Proper API key authentication
- Clean URL parameter encoding
- Proper response handling
29113-29161: LGTM: Update target endpoint implementation is secure and robust.
The implementation includes:
- Required parameter validation for both targetId and request body
- Proper API key authentication
- Clean URL parameter encoding
- Proper request body serialization
- Proper response handling
| build: | ||
| context: . | ||
| dockerfile: ./apps/webservice/Dockerfile |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Just docker-compose build if you wanna test locally.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 5
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
pnpm-workspace.yaml (1)
21-21: Consider documenting the reason for the Next.js version update.Since this PR is focused on OpenTelemetry changes, it would be helpful to document whether this version bump is required for the OpenTelemetry integration or if it's addressing specific issues.
apps/webservice/src/instrumentation-node.ts (1)
51-51: Remove "test" suffix from log messageThe log message appears to include a debugging suffix that should be removed.
- console.log("Tracing initialized test"); + console.log("Tracing initialized");
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
pnpm-lock.yamlis excluded by!**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (8)
apps/webservice/Dockerfile(2 hunks)apps/webservice/next.config.js(1 hunks)apps/webservice/package.json(1 hunks)apps/webservice/src/instrumentation-node.ts(2 hunks)apps/webservice/src/instrumentation.ts(1 hunks)docker-compose.yaml(2 hunks)otel-collector-config.yaml(1 hunks)pnpm-workspace.yaml(1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- apps/webservice/src/instrumentation.ts
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- apps/webservice/next.config.js
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Gitleaks
docker-compose.yaml
53-53: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
59-59: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
73-73: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
84-84: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
🔇 Additional comments (14)
pnpm-workspace.yaml (1)
21-21: LGTM! Verify Next.js changelog for version 14.2.17.
The minor version bump from 14.2.13 to 14.2.17 follows semantic versioning and should only contain backward-compatible changes.
✅ Verification successful
Version bump is safe to proceed
The changelog for Next.js 14.2.17 shows only bug fixes:
- Node binary handling fix
- Pages/500 cache-control handling
- Runtime error fix in generateMetadata for parallel routes
None of these changes affect OpenTelemetry integration, but they are important stability improvements that are backward compatible.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify if the version bump includes relevant changes for OpenTelemetry
# Expected: Changes related to OpenTelemetry or relevant bug fixes
# Check the Next.js changelog for version 14.2.17
gh api repos/vercel/next.js/releases | jq -r '.[] | select(.tag_name | contains("v14.2.17")) | .body'
Length of output: 524
apps/webservice/src/instrumentation-node.ts (3)
9-9: LGTM: Import statement for SimpleSpanProcessor
The import is correctly added to support the span processor changes.
17-17: Verify the impact of switching to SimpleSpanProcessor
The change from BatchSpanProcessor to SimpleSpanProcessor will process and export spans immediately instead of batching them. While this provides lower latency for observability, it may impact performance in high-throughput scenarios due to increased network calls and resource usage.
Please confirm:
- Was this change intentional?
- Have you tested the performance impact under expected load?
Consider using BatchSpanProcessor for production environments to optimize resource usage:
- spanProcessors: [new SimpleSpanProcessor(new OTLPTraceExporter())],
+ spanProcessors: [new BatchSpanProcessor(new OTLPTraceExporter())],Line range hint 13-45: Verify OTLP endpoint configuration
The PR title mentions "Adding OTEL_EXPORTER_OTLP_ENDPOINT", but there's no explicit endpoint configuration in the code. While this likely relies on the OTEL_EXPORTER_OTLP_ENDPOINT environment variable, it would be beneficial to:
- Document the required environment variables
- Consider adding fallback endpoints for different environments
✅ Verification successful
OTLP endpoint is properly configured in Docker environment
The OTEL_EXPORTER_OTLP_ENDPOINT is correctly configured in docker-compose.yaml pointing to the OpenTelemetry collector at http://otel-collector:4318. However, for better maintainability:
- Consider documenting this environment variable in a
.env.examplefile or README - Add environment-specific configurations (development/staging/production) if needed
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if OTEL_EXPORTER_OTLP_ENDPOINT is properly configured in environment files
echo "Checking for OTEL_EXPORTER_OTLP_ENDPOINT configuration..."
rg -l "OTEL_EXPORTER_OTLP_ENDPOINT"
Length of output: 180
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the configuration in docker-compose.yaml
echo "Checking docker-compose.yaml for OTEL_EXPORTER_OTLP_ENDPOINT configuration..."
cat docker-compose.yaml | grep -A 5 -B 5 "OTEL_EXPORTER_OTLP_ENDPOINT"
# Check for any documentation about environment variables
echo -e "\nChecking for environment variable documentation..."
fd README.md | xargs grep -l "OTEL_EXPORTER_OTLP_ENDPOINT" || true
fd .env.example | xargs grep -l "OTEL_EXPORTER_OTLP_ENDPOINT" || true
Length of output: 995
otel-collector-config.yaml (5)
1-7: LGTM! Secure configuration using environment variables.
The Datadog connector and exporter are properly configured using environment variables for sensitive credentials.
15-20: Previous comment about batch processor optimization still applies.
21-31: Previous comment about securing receiver endpoints still applies.
78-80: Previous comment about securing telemetry metrics endpoint still applies.
1-80: Verify endpoint configuration with Docker Compose setup.
Please ensure that the configured endpoints (4317, 4318, 8125, 9109, 8888) align with the port mappings in your Docker Compose files and are accessible to the web service container.
✅ Verification successful
Port configurations are correctly aligned across Docker Compose and OTEL Collector
The verification confirms that:
- All ports configured in
otel-collector-config.yaml(4317, 4318, 8125, 8888, 9109) are properly mapped indocker-compose.yaml - The web service is correctly configured with
OTEL_EXPORTER_OTLP_ENDPOINT: "http://otel-collector:4318"which matches the OTLP HTTP endpoint in the collector config
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify port configurations in Docker Compose files
# Test: Check port mappings in Docker Compose files
echo "Checking port mappings in Docker Compose files..."
rg -A 5 "ports:" docker-compose*.y*ml
# Test: Check if OTEL_EXPORTER_OTLP_ENDPOINT is properly configured
echo "Checking OTEL_EXPORTER_OTLP_ENDPOINT configuration..."
rg "OTEL_EXPORTER_OTLP_ENDPOINT" .
Length of output: 2463
apps/webservice/Dockerfile (1)
23-23: Verify .npmrc file handling and contents.
The addition of .npmrc could expose sensitive information if it contains auth tokens or private registry credentials. Ensure that:
- The file is properly gitignored
- Sensitive credentials are injected at build time instead of being copied
✅ Verification successful
No security concerns with .npmrc file
The .npmrc file only contains the configuration node-linker=hoisted which is a safe, non-sensitive setting used for pnpm package management. While the file is not explicitly gitignored, it doesn't contain any sensitive information that would pose a security risk.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if .npmrc is properly gitignored
grep -l "\.npmrc" .gitignore
# Check .npmrc contents for potential sensitive data
if [ -f .npmrc ]; then
# Look for common patterns of tokens/auth
rg -i "auth[token_]|//.*:.*@|_authToken|registry.npmjs.org/:_authToken" .npmrc
fi
Length of output: 131
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if .npmrc exists in the repository
fd -H -t f .npmrc
# Check .gitignore content
cat .gitignore
# Look for any .npmrc related patterns in git history
git log -p | rg -i "\.npmrc"
Length of output: 682
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the contents of .npmrc file
cat .npmrc
# Look for any sensitive patterns in the actual file
rg -i "token|auth|password|secret|registry" .npmrc
Length of output: 85
docker-compose.yaml (2)
64-64: Verify port change impact.
The service port has been changed from 8080 to 3000. Ensure this change is reflected in any documentation, deployment configurations, or client applications that may be connecting to this service.
89-101: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Security and stability considerations for OpenTelemetry collector.
-
Avoid using the
latesttag as it can lead to unexpected changes and breaks. Pin to a specific version. -
Review the necessity of exposing all ports, especially the telemetry port (8888).
-
Pin the image version:
- image: otel/opentelemetry-collector-contrib:latest
+ image: otel/opentelemetry-collector-contrib:0.91.0- Consider restricting port exposure to only required endpoints and limiting access through network policies.
✅ Verification successful
Port exposure aligns with configuration, but version pinning is still recommended
The configuration file validates that all exposed ports (4317, 4318, 8125, 8888, 9109) are actively used:
- 4317: OTLP gRPC receiver
- 4318: OTLP HTTP receiver
- 8125: StatsD receiver
- 8888: Telemetry metrics
- 9109: Prometheus exporter
The original concern about unnecessary port exposure is incorrect as each port serves a specific purpose defined in the configuration. However, the recommendation to pin the image version remains valid to ensure stability and reproducibility.
[refactor_suggestion]
- image: otel/opentelemetry-collector-contrib:latest
+ image: otel/opentelemetry-collector-contrib:0.91.0🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if the mounted config file exists and is properly configured
if [ -f "./otel-collector-config.yaml" ]; then
echo "Verifying OpenTelemetry collector configuration..."
cat "./otel-collector-config.yaml"
else
echo "Warning: otel-collector-config.yaml not found!"
fi
Length of output: 1676
apps/webservice/package.json (2)
35-37: Verify impact of removing BullMQ instrumentation.
The removal of @appsignal/opentelemetry-instrumentation-bullmq might affect queue monitoring. Please ensure this removal is intentional and won't impact your observability requirements.
Let's check for BullMQ usage in the codebase:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for BullMQ usage that might need instrumentation
echo "Checking for BullMQ imports or usage:"
rg -l 'import.*Bull|from.*bullmq|new Queue|new Worker'
echo "Checking for existing queue monitoring or metrics collection:"
rg -l 'metrics.*queue|monitor.*queue|trace.*queue'35-37: OpenTelemetry dependency updates look good, verify breaking changes.
The coordinated updates of OpenTelemetry packages to their latest minor versions are good practice. However, since these updates span multiple minor versions, please ensure:
- The new versions are compatible with your OTLP endpoint configuration
- No breaking changes in the SDK affect your current instrumentation setup
Let's verify the changelog entries for potential breaking changes:
✅ Verification successful
OpenTelemetry updates are safe to proceed
Based on the codebase analysis:
- The OpenTelemetry setup is straightforward, using standard initialization patterns in
instrumentation-node.ts - No usage of BullMQ instrumentation was found in the telemetry configuration
- The version updates are compatible with the current implementation:
- Auto-instrumentations configuration remains unchanged
- OTLP exporter usage follows the same pattern
- No breaking changes in the SDK initialization
The removal of @appsignal/opentelemetry-instrumentation-bullmq appears safe as there's no evidence of its usage in the telemetry setup.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for breaking changes in the updated packages
echo "Checking @opentelemetry/auto-instrumentations-node changelog between v0.50.0 and v0.52.1"
gh api repos/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-js-contrib/releases | jq -r '.[] | select(.tag_name | startswith("auto-instrumentations-node-v0.5")) | .body'
echo "Checking @opentelemetry/exporter-trace-otlp-http and @opentelemetry/sdk-node changelogs between v0.53.0 and v0.54.2"
gh api repos/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-js/releases | jq -r '.[] | select(.tag_name | startswith("v0.5")) | .body'
Length of output: 613
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach to check for breaking changes
# Check for OpenTelemetry configuration files
echo "Checking for OpenTelemetry configuration files:"
fd -t f -e ts -e js | grep -i telemetry
# Check for current OpenTelemetry usage patterns
echo -e "\nChecking OpenTelemetry initialization and setup:"
rg -A 5 "NodeSDK|OTLPTraceExporter|instrumentations"
# Check for BullMQ related telemetry
echo -e "\nChecking for BullMQ telemetry usage:"
rg -A 3 "@appsignal/opentelemetry-instrumentation-bullmq"
# Check next.config.js for telemetry changes
echo -e "\nChecking next.config.js for telemetry changes:"
fd next.config.js -x cat {}
Length of output: 5763
| @@ -20,6 +20,7 @@ COPY turbo.json turbo.json | |||
| RUN pnpm add -g turbo | |||
|
|
|||
| COPY package.json package.json | |||
| COPY .npmrc .npmrc | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@jsbroks this is the fix.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
docker-compose.yaml (1)
68-73: Consider service-specific encryption keysWhile using a sample AES key is fine for development, in production consider:
- Using different keys per service for better security isolation
- Implementing proper key rotation mechanisms
🧰 Tools
🪛 Gitleaks
73-73: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
pnpm-lock.yamlis excluded by!**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
apps/webservice/Dockerfile(1 hunks)apps/webservice/package.json(1 hunks)apps/webservice/src/instrumentation-node.ts(0 hunks)docker-compose.yaml(2 hunks)pnpm-workspace.yaml(1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
- apps/webservice/src/instrumentation-node.ts
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (3)
- apps/webservice/Dockerfile
- apps/webservice/package.json
- pnpm-workspace.yaml
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Gitleaks
docker-compose.yaml
59-59: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
73-73: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
84-84: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
🔇 Additional comments (5)
docker-compose.yaml (5)
1-1: LGTM: Docker Compose version upgrade
The upgrade to version 3.9 is appropriate and provides access to newer features that might be beneficial for security options and deployment conditions.
29-34: LGTM: Migrations service updates
The image update and POSTGRES_URL format changes are consistent with the database connectivity updates across the application.
38-42: LGTM: Development-friendly configuration
The switch to build context is appropriate for local development and testing, allowing for immediate testing of changes.
47-53: LGTM: Proper externalization of sensitive values
Good practice using environment variables for sensitive authentication configuration.
56-59: Verify OpenTelemetry configuration
The OTEL configuration looks correct, but let's ensure the endpoint is properly configured in the application code.
#!/bin/bash
# Check if the OTEL endpoint is properly used in the codebase
rg "OTEL_EXPORTER_OTLP_ENDPOINT" --type typescript --type javascript🧰 Tools
🪛 Gitleaks
59-59: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
This pr
winston-transportSummary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
Updates
Bug Fixes
Documentation