Takes an existing OpenAPI Document and allows straightforward implementation of the API defined within it using the Cro libraries.
# Implement the OpenAPI defined in schema.yaml.
my $routes = openapi 'schema.yaml'.IO, {
# Given an operation defined like this:
#
# summary: Updates a pet in the store with form data
# operationId: updatePetWithForm
# parameters:
# - name: petId
# in: path
# description: ID of pet that needs to be updated
# required: true
# schema:
# type: string
# requestBody:
# content:
# 'application/x-www-form-urlencoded':
# schema:
# properties:
# name:
# description: Updated name of the pet
# type: string
# status:
# description: Updated status of the pet
# type: string
# required:
# - status
# responses:
# '200':
# description: Pet updated.
# content:
# 'application/json': {}
# '400':
# description: Invalid input
# content:
# 'application/json': {}
#
# We can implement it by receiving the route parameter as a positional
# argument; other literal route segments need not be mentioned.
operation 'updatePetWithForm', -> $id {
# The request body will already have been validated, so just grab
# it, perhaps using destructuring.
request-body -> (:$name, :$status) {
# Do something with it.
$some-store.update-pet($id, $name, $status);
# Respond (response automatically checked against schema too).
content 'application/json', {};
}
}
}
The $routes
object is a subclass of Cro::HTTP::Router::RouteSet
, and so
can be included into a route block:
my $api-routes = openapi 'schema.yaml'.IO, {
...
}
my $app = route {
include 'api' => $api-routes;
}
Since it is also a Cro::Transform
, then it may be hosted directly as the
application using Cro::HTTP::Server
.
my $service = Cro::HTTP::Server:
:host<0.0.0.0>, :port(10000),
:application($api-routes);
The openapi
sub works somewhat like route
from Cro::HTTP::Router
. As in
a route
block, it is possible to:
- Use
before
andafter
to add middleware. Thebefore
middleware will be after the validation of a request takes place, and theafter
middleware will be run before the validation of a response takes place. This means that middleware can rely on processing a request that has passed validation, whileafter
middleware can add, for example, standard headers (such as rate limiting) to responses. - Use
body-parser
andbody-serializer
to specify body parsers and serializers. The body parsers will be put in place before validation of the body, to ensure deserialization works as desired.
By contrast, get
, put
, post
and so forth are not valid in the context
of an openapi
block, and using them will produce an error. Instead, the
operation
sub should be used to specify the implementations of operations
defined by the OpenAPI document. The URI patterns to match will be taken from
the OpenAPI document, and need not be repeated. Similarly, include
and
delegate
are not available either (a form of include
may be supported in
the future in order to allow for breaking up the definition of a large API
over multiple files).
The openapi
sub may be passed a string containing an OpenAPI document in
either YAML or JSON:
openapi $json-doc, {
...
}
Or an IO
object pointing to a file to read the document from:
openapi "api.yaml".IO, {
...
}
In either case, JSON will be detected by looking at the data that is read and
seeing if it starts with {
(with leading whitespace allowed); failing that,
it will be parsed as YAML.
The openapi
sub may be passed the following options:
:ignore-unimplemented
- by default, an operation in the OpenAPI document that does not have an implementation in theopenapi
block will result in an error being raised by theopenapi
sub. This is to help you understand when an API has not been completely implemented. Setting this option will cause unimplemented operations to be ignored instead.:!validate-responses
- this option defaults to True, but may be set toFalse
. If set to False, then responses will not be validated. This may be useful for increasing production performance, once confident the API has been correctly implemented.:%formats
and:%add-formats
- passed toOpenAPI::Schema::Validate
to control format validation (%add-formats
adds additional formats or overrides existing ones which%formats
allows for a full replacement of the available formats).:%document
- used to configure how the OpenAPI document itself is served. It defaults to{ '/openapi.json' => 'json', '/openapi.yaml' => 'yaml' }
, which means that the OpenAPI specification will be served as both JSON and YAML on requests to/openapi.json
and/openapi.yaml
respectively. To serve a format at the root of the API, pass:document{ json => '/' }
(this also means it will not be served at/openapi.json
and/openapi.yaml
any longer). It is fine to register multiple paths to serve the document for a given format at.
All operations in the OpenAPI document should have an operationId
in order
to be implementable. Unless configured with :ignore-unimplemented
, such
operations will be complained about, with a note that it is not even possible
to implement them.
The operation
sub is used to specify the implementation of an operation in
the OpenAPI file. It takes a string operation ID and a block that will be run
per request to that operation.
If the string operation ID does not match an operationId
in the OpenAPI
definition, an error will be raised.
The signature of the block may be used in order to unpack various properties
of the request. This works similarly to signatures on get
and similar in
Cro::HTTP::Router
, but with some differences.
-
The first parameter may be a session or auth object, populated according to the usual
Cro::HTTP::Router
rules. -
Route parameters, from the request target, will be passed as positional arguments. Thus, the signature of the operation must be able to accept them, and cope with optional route parameters. An error will be given if the signature of any operation block is not suitable. Note that literal route parameters must not be mentioned, and the parameter variable names are not significant (the route parameters are passed in the order they appear in the URI).
-
Query string parameters may be unpacked into named arguments (either those with no applicable source trait or those marked with
is query
will be considered). There is no requirement to unpack all of the query string parameters. However, it is an error to name one that does not exist in the OpenAPI document. -
Headers and cookies may be unpacked into named arguments (using the
is header
andis cookie
parameter traits). There is no requirement to unpack these here, and it is allowed to unpack others not mentioned in the OpenAPI specification (to provide access to "standard" headers, for example).
Otherwise, it is just like being inside a normal get
, post
, etc. block as
with Cro::HTTP::Router
. The request
and response
terms provide access to
the request and response objects, the request-body
sub is available, and the
various response helpers (such as content
) are also available.
A request will be validated against the OpenAPI definition. The following aspects of the request will be validated:
- Method (
GET
,POST
, etc.) (failure to match will result in an automatic 405 response). - Route (path) arguments from the target URI (failure to match these will result in an automatic 404 response).
- Query string arguments, headers, and cookies (failure to match these will result in an automatic 400 response).
- The content type of the request body (failure to match this will result in an automatic 400 response).
- The request body. Cro has built-in support for JSON,
multipart/form-data
andapplication/x-www-form-urlencoded
request bodies, and validation will work out of the box. For other body formats, abody-parser
will be required, and it should produce output that can be traversed like a JSON data structure in order for schema validation to work. Failure to match the schema for the request body will result in an autoamtic 400 response.
A response will (unless response validation is disabled) be validated for:
- The status code of the response. Note that 400, 404, and 405 errors that are automatically produced as a result of request validation will always be allowed through.
- That the required headers are present and match the schema.
- The content type of the response body.
- The response body. Cro has built-in support for JSON response bodies, and
validation will work out of the box. For other formats, a
body-serializer
will be needed, and the data structure to serialize should be a JSON-like tree of hashes/arrays so it can be validated against the schema.
Failure to validate the response indicates an implementation error. A 500 error will be returned to the client, and the error will be logged.
It may in some cases be desirable to handle request validation errors as part of the operation implementation. Note that this does not apply to an incorrect method or non-matching route parameters. Further, it presumes that any named unpacks in the operation signature are liberal enough to cope with the invalid data.
To manually handle request validation errors, pass :allow-invalid
to the
operation
sub. The request-validation-error
sub can then be used in order
to check if there is a validation error. If there is, then it will be populated
with an instance of X::Cro::OpenAPI::RoutesFromDefinition::CheckFailed
, which
is a subclass of Exception
. It has the properties:
http-message
- the request that failed to parse. Same asrequest
in the scope of a handler.reason
- a string explaining the reason that validation failed
If there is no request validation error, then Nil
is returned, meaning it can be
tested using with
or without
.
operation 'foo', :allow-invalid, -> $path-param {
with request-validation-error() -> $error {
content 'application/json', { :result('error'), :reason($error.reason) };
}
else {
???;
content 'application/json', { :result("ok") };
}
}
Enforcing security requirements involves:
- Implementing the
Cro::OpenAPI::RoutesFromDefinition::SecurityChecker
role - Passing that using the
security
named parameter to theopenapi
function
Implementing the role requires implementing a single method, which receives the
security scheme to enforce, the HTTP request object, an array of requirements
(optional, and only applicable to OpenID) and the operation ID (also optional).
It should return True
if the requester satisfies the security requirements,
and False
if not.
role Cro::OpenAPI::RoutesFromDefinition::SecurityChecker {
method is-allowed(OpenAPI::Model::SecurityScheme $scheme, Cro::HTTP::Request $request,
:@requirements, :$operation-id --> Bool) { ... }
}
For the case of API keys, the role provides a get-api-key($scheme, $request)
method that will use the scheme to look up the API key from the request. It will
return a Failure
if the is no such header, cookie, or query string parameter, or
if the scheme type is not apiKey
.
An example implementation of the role looks like this:
class KeyChecker does Cro::OpenAPI::RoutesFromDefinition::SecurityChecker {
method is-allowed(OpenAPI::Model::SecurityScheme $scheme, Cro::HTTP::Request $request --> Bool) {
with self.get-api-key($scheme, $request) -> $key {
if $key.starts-with('totally-legit') {
$request.auth = MyAuthInfo.new(:$key);
return True;
}
}
return False;
}
}
Which could be used like this:
my $application = openapi $api-doc, security => KeyChecker, {
operation 'public', -> {
content 'text/plain', 'public ok';
}
operation 'private', -> {
content 'text/plain', 'private ok, key=' ~ request.auth.key;
}
}
Jonathan Worthington [email protected]
Copyright 2018 Edument Central Europe sro.
This library is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it under the Artistic License 2.0.