-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix(codec): provide legacy amino og type #23504
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe pull request modifies the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: .coderabbit.yml 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🧰 Additional context used📓 Path-based instructions (1)codec/depinject.go (1)Pattern 🪛 GitHub Actions: v2 core Testscodec/depinject.go[warning] Error registering services: unable to make a appmodulev2.HandlerFunc from gRPC handler (cosmos.reflection.v1.ReflectionService, FileDescriptors): no proto message found for cosmos.reflection.v1.FileDescriptorsRequest ⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (3)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
✨ Finishing Touches
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
@julienrbrt your pull request is missing a changelog! |
i can add in the backport |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
couldn't we just return the concrete impl here? or does it cause problems?
I think we want to expose both |
Description
Found when integrating ignite with 0.52/ibc (ignite/cli#4477)
x/params input aren't satisfied by runtime as it required an actual codec.LegacyAmino. x/params cannot use the amino registrar directly (and i don't think we should take time to refactor it so it can, as this module is deprecated)
Author Checklist
All items are required. Please add a note to the item if the item is not applicable and
please add links to any relevant follow up issues.
I have...
!
in the type prefix if API or client breaking changeCHANGELOG.md
Reviewers Checklist
All items are required. Please add a note if the item is not applicable and please add
your handle next to the items reviewed if you only reviewed selected items.
Please see Pull Request Reviewer section in the contributing guide for more information on how to review a pull request.
I have...
Summary by CodeRabbit
ProvideLegacyAmino
function to return an additionalLegacyAmino
pointer alongside the existingAminoRegistrar
This change modifies the function's return type, providing more comprehensive output while maintaining the original functionality of the method.