refactor(store): remove defer in the loop and refactor code #23351
Conversation
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe pull request introduces refactoring to the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Finishing Touches
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
hoank101
changed the title
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
store/v2/commitment/store.go (1)
Line range hint
1009-1012: Remove redundant error loggingThe error is both logged and returned with a wrap, which is redundant. Consider removing the log line since the wrapped error will provide sufficient context.
if importer == nil { - rs.logger.Error("failed to restore; received IAVL node item before store item") return errorsmod.Wrap(types.ErrLogic, "received IAVL node item before store item") }store/rootmulti/store.go (2)
941-982: Consider extracting common restore logicThe restoration logic is duplicated between
store/v2/commitment/store.goandstore/rootmulti/store.go. Consider extracting the common functionality into a shared utility package to improve maintainability and reduce duplication.
984-1056: Consider creating a shared restore interfaceThe helper functions are duplicated between the two store implementations. Consider:
- Creating a shared interface for restore operations
- Implementing a base restore handler that both stores can embed
- Moving the helper functions to the base implementation
This would improve maintainability and ensure consistent behavior across stores.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
store/rootmulti/store.go(1 hunks)store/v2/commitment/store.go(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (2)
store/v2/commitment/store.go (1)
Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.
store/rootmulti/store.go (1)
Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (12)
- GitHub Check: tests (03)
- GitHub Check: tests (02)
- GitHub Check: tests (00)
- GitHub Check: test-store-v2
- GitHub Check: test-simapp-v2
- GitHub Check: test-sim-nondeterminism
- GitHub Check: test-integration
- GitHub Check: test-system-v2
- GitHub Check: Analyze
- GitHub Check: build (amd64)
- GitHub Check: golangci-lint
- GitHub Check: Summary
🔇 Additional comments (4)
store/v2/commitment/store.go (4)
512-552: Well-structured restoration logic with proper resource cleanup!The main restoration loop is well-organized with proper error handling and resource cleanup through defer. The code effectively handles different types of snapshot items through a clear switch statement.
554-578: Clean implementation of store item handling!The helper function effectively manages the importer lifecycle with proper error handling and descriptive error messages. The function follows the single responsibility principle and includes comprehensive nil checks.
Line range hint
1027-1046: Excellent implementation with clear documentation!The helper function is well-documented, especially regarding protobuf nil handling. It correctly handles edge cases and follows the single responsibility principle.
Line range hint
1048-1056: Clean implementation of restore finalization!The helper function effectively handles the final steps of restoration with proper error handling and metadata updates.
Description
Closes: #XXXX
Author Checklist
All items are required. Please add a note to the item if the item is not applicable and
please add links to any relevant follow up issues.
I have...
!in the type prefix if API or client breaking changeCHANGELOG.mdReviewers Checklist
All items are required. Please add a note if the item is not applicable and please add
your handle next to the items reviewed if you only reviewed selected items.
Please see Pull Request Reviewer section in the contributing guide for more information on how to review a pull request.
I have...
Summary by CodeRabbit
Refactor
StoreandCommitStoreDocumentation
The changes focus on improving the internal implementation of snapshot restoration mechanisms, making the code more maintainable without altering core functionality.