Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Document TAG Roles - TAG governance template file #1116
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Document TAG Roles - TAG governance template file #1116
Changes from 1 commit
4490fd8
649b2e5
b3364b9
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
One thought I'd like to share here is that it would be beneficial to have a more data driven/evidential approach to identifying tech lead candidates. The thinking here is that whilst community activities (chop wood and carry water) are valuable, having deep seated expertise is a fantastic way to build trust with projects and act as the bridge between community and contributor.
I feel a fair way to assist in this might be to ask any nominee to contribute three examples of their work within the field that demonstrate aptitude and appropriateness for the role. As part of the election process this also gives the committee more substantive information to elect the appropriate representative.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
👍, interesting thought. We should keep it in mind for upcoming discussions. Since this PR doesn't make any other changes to this document, which templates the election process (just the headers to make the links), we'll pick this up in a follow-up PR. I will keep the discussion open nonetheless so others see it.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@erinaboyd - Leo pulled together an initial list pertinent to the specific TAG operations, I'm sure there are elements here you've already captured in your draft for Chair responsibilities. I've added a placeholder here on line 38 for when we've got them drafted in a PR. I'd think keeping our defined responsibilities and expectations separate from the template here (for use by TAGs) is reasonable. What are your thoughts?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Perfect. I will add the proposed suggestion already, but keep this discussion open, so we don't lose track, to update the placeholder, and add possible other suggestions.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@erinaboyd, if you find a bit of time, could you take at this section? Thanks! :)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Let's consolidate this with the Working Group Leads under a Group Lead function. One may be time-limited/deliverable oriented, the other may be focused groups for ongoing and continual activities. So long as these are defined by the TAG, and approved by the TOC liaisons, the general responsibilities are not much different except in the specifics of implementation.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, good idea. I will merge both sections. 👍
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
b3364b9