-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 61
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat: Include Confirmation dialogue if a file is about to be overwritten #86
Open
prithvijj
wants to merge
1
commit into
charmbracelet:main
Choose a base branch
from
prithvijj:main
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
should check for if is a directory or not first. If directory, might be better to fail immediately. to save people from themselves.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Fair, I shall get to this in like the next 6 hours or something
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hey @debdutdeb
So I tried the following:
freeze.png
already existnon-exist/file.png
indicating an example of the directory not existing, and adding a file within a non existent directoryAnd it failed which is good
Obviously when I added it as a parameter for the output, it fails as expected since the file is being added within a non existent directory, which I think is intended
And finally, when the form pops up and add the filename as
non-exist-dir/non-exist-dir2
to also indicate 2 non existent directory, it fails as expected (yeah even though thenon-exist-dir2
would end up becoming a file atleast with me being on Pop OS)but yeah should I still go ahead and check if the given path is a directory? To me it seems like it ends up handling it, open to whatever!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It does but ig that depends on how file is being written and expection for actions after the confirmation. Like code that writes to the files consider them simply files, and might someday want to remove before writing, which would remove the directory not knowing it is a directory.
So I'd suggest still adding that check.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Sure thing, will look into it within like 24 hours or something!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
#86 (comment)
Gone ahead and resolved it here, lemme know if there's anything else!