-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 88
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
cardano-node: 10.2 #1814
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
cardano-node: 10.2 #1814
Conversation
2a03f87
to
08b0d89
Compare
Transaction cost differencesScript summary
|
Parties | Tx size | % max Mem | % max CPU | Min fee ₳ |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | - | - | - | - |
2 | - | - | - | - |
3 | - | - | - | - |
5 | - | - | - | - |
10 | - | - | - | - |
44 | - | - | - | - |
Commit
transaction costs
UTxO | Tx size | % max Mem | % max CPU | Min fee ₳ |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | - | - | - | - |
2 | - | - | - | - |
3 | - | - | - | - |
5 | - | - | - | - |
10 | - | - | - | - |
54 | - | - | - | - |
CollectCom
transaction costs
Parties | UTxO (bytes) | Tx size | % max Mem | % max CPU | Min fee ₳ |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | - | - | - | - | - |
2 | - | - | - | - | - |
3 | - | - | - | - | - |
4 | - | - | - | - | - |
5 | - | - | - | - | - |
6 | - | - | - | - | - |
7 | - | - | - | - | - |
8 | - | - | - | - | - |
9 | - | - | - | - | - |
10 | - | - | - | - | - |
Cost of Increment Transaction
Parties | Tx size | % max Mem | % max CPU | Min fee ₳ |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | - | +0.39 | +0.09 | - |
2 | - | |||
3 | - | - | - | - |
5 | - | - | - | - |
10 | - | - | ||
43 | - | - | - | - |
Cost of Decrement Transaction
Parties | Tx size | % max Mem | % max CPU | Min fee ₳ |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | - | - | - | - |
2 | - | - | - | - |
3 | - | - | - | - |
5 | - | - | - | - |
10 | - | - | - | - |
45 | - | - | - | - |
Close
transaction costs
Parties | Tx size | % max Mem | % max CPU | Min fee ₳ |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | - | - | - | - |
2 | - | - | - | - |
3 | - | - | - | - |
5 | - | - | - | - |
10 | - | - | - | - |
41 | - | - | - | - |
Contest
transaction costs
Parties | Tx size | % max Mem | % max CPU | Min fee ₳ |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | - | - | - | - |
2 | - | - | - | - |
3 | - | - | - | - |
5 | - | - | - | - |
10 | - | - | - | - |
33 | - | - | - | - |
FanOut
transaction costs
UTxO, Parties | UTxO (bytes) | Tx size | % max Mem | % max CPU | Min fee ₳ |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
(0, 10) | - | - | - | - | - |
(1, 10) | - | - | - | - | - |
(5, 10) | - | - | - | - | - |
(10, 10) | - | - | - | - | - |
(20, 10) | - | - | - | - | - |
(40, 10) | - | - | - | - | - |
(41, 10) | - | - | - | - | - |
d1744ed
to
0e8e553
Compare
Transaction costsSizes and execution budgets for Hydra protocol transactions. Note that unlisted parameters are currently using
Script summary
|
Parties | Tx size | % max Mem | % max CPU | Min fee ₳ |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 6164 | 10.00 | 3.17 | 0.53 |
2 | 6366 | 12.36 | 3.94 | 0.56 |
3 | 6566 | 14.43 | 4.59 | 0.59 |
5 | 6968 | 18.26 | 5.77 | 0.65 |
10 | 7974 | 28.59 | 9.03 | 0.80 |
44 | 14814 | 98.59 | 31.06 | 1.82 |
Commit
transaction costs
This uses ada-only outputs for better comparability.
UTxO | Tx size | % max Mem | % max CPU | Min fee ₳ |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 559 | 2.44 | 1.16 | 0.20 |
2 | 740 | 3.38 | 1.73 | 0.22 |
3 | 919 | 4.36 | 2.33 | 0.24 |
5 | 1279 | 6.41 | 3.60 | 0.28 |
10 | 2180 | 12.13 | 7.25 | 0.40 |
54 | 10071 | 98.61 | 68.52 | 1.88 |
CollectCom
transaction costs
Parties | UTxO (bytes) | Tx size | % max Mem | % max CPU | Min fee ₳ |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 57 | 525 | 25.00 | 7.26 | 0.43 |
2 | 114 | 636 | 33.95 | 9.78 | 0.52 |
3 | 170 | 747 | 39.78 | 11.57 | 0.59 |
4 | 227 | 862 | 52.14 | 14.94 | 0.72 |
5 | 282 | 969 | 55.87 | 16.23 | 0.76 |
6 | 339 | 1085 | 66.73 | 19.25 | 0.88 |
7 | 394 | 1192 | 72.37 | 21.10 | 0.94 |
8 | 449 | 1303 | 98.11 | 27.56 | 1.20 |
Cost of Increment Transaction
Parties | Tx size | % max Mem | % max CPU | Min fee ₳ |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 1812 | 23.66 | 7.92 | 0.48 |
2 | 1963 | 26.18 | 9.43 | 0.52 |
3 | 2072 | 26.61 | 10.18 | 0.53 |
5 | 2322 | 30.03 | 12.56 | 0.59 |
10 | 3121 | 39.53 | 19.10 | 0.74 |
44 | 8087 | 96.78 | 60.68 | 1.73 |
Cost of Decrement Transaction
Parties | Tx size | % max Mem | % max CPU | Min fee ₳ |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 597 | 22.72 | 7.32 | 0.41 |
2 | 688 | 22.39 | 7.88 | 0.42 |
3 | 869 | 24.96 | 9.27 | 0.46 |
5 | 1271 | 32.31 | 12.66 | 0.56 |
10 | 2072 | 41.21 | 18.51 | 0.71 |
42 | 6778 | 97.67 | 55.71 | 1.64 |
Close
transaction costs
Parties | Tx size | % max Mem | % max CPU | Min fee ₳ |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 716 | 26.99 | 8.73 | 0.46 |
2 | 817 | 28.61 | 9.90 | 0.49 |
3 | 956 | 32.66 | 11.85 | 0.54 |
5 | 1295 | 36.61 | 14.53 | 0.61 |
10 | 2051 | 45.66 | 20.82 | 0.76 |
40 | 6603 | 99.83 | 59.26 | 1.67 |
Contest
transaction costs
Parties | Tx size | % max Mem | % max CPU | Min fee ₳ |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 663 | 33.39 | 10.43 | 0.52 |
2 | 804 | 35.33 | 11.69 | 0.56 |
3 | 947 | 37.33 | 12.97 | 0.59 |
5 | 1273 | 41.66 | 15.75 | 0.66 |
10 | 1967 | 51.94 | 22.34 | 0.82 |
31 | 5337 | 99.39 | 52.11 | 1.56 |
Abort
transaction costs
There is some variation due to the random mixture of initial and already committed outputs.
Parties | Tx size | % max Mem | % max CPU | Min fee ₳ |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 6052 | 26.17 | 8.85 | 0.69 |
2 | 6238 | 35.68 | 12.11 | 0.80 |
3 | 6337 | 44.09 | 14.95 | 0.89 |
4 | 6394 | 51.55 | 17.45 | 0.97 |
5 | 6680 | 63.39 | 21.57 | 1.11 |
6 | 6425 | 55.57 | 18.55 | 1.02 |
7 | 6850 | 77.35 | 26.23 | 1.27 |
8 | 7133 | 91.62 | 31.08 | 1.43 |
10 | 7135 | 97.70 | 32.98 | 1.49 |
FanOut
transaction costs
Involves spending head output and burning head tokens. Uses ada-only UTXO for better comparability.
Parties | UTxO | UTxO (bytes) | Tx size | % max Mem | % max CPU | Min fee ₳ |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
10 | 1 | 57 | 6196 | 19.26 | 6.67 | 0.63 |
10 | 5 | 286 | 6334 | 27.25 | 9.88 | 0.72 |
10 | 42 | 2391 | 7589 | 99.57 | 38.97 | 1.57 |
End-to-end benchmark results
This page is intended to collect the latest end-to-end benchmark results produced by Hydra's continuous integration (CI) system from the latest master
code.
Please note that these results are approximate as they are currently produced from limited cloud VMs and not controlled hardware. Rather than focusing on the absolute results, the emphasis should be on relative results, such as how the timings for a scenario evolve as the code changes.
Generated at 2025-01-31 12:07:52.662445628 UTC
Baseline Scenario
Number of nodes | 1 |
---|---|
Number of txs | 300 |
Avg. Confirmation Time (ms) | 5.164342590 |
P99 | 9.642952519999996ms |
P95 | 6.801178ms |
P50 | 4.937037500000001ms |
Number of Invalid txs | 0 |
Three local nodes
Number of nodes | 3 |
---|---|
Number of txs | 900 |
Avg. Confirmation Time (ms) | 23.574701196 |
P99 | 114.79897514999999ms |
P95 | 31.78102404999999ms |
P50 | 21.3256815ms |
Number of Invalid txs | 0 |
6ffaf6a
to
c1e7c42
Compare
c1e7c42
to
990a421
Compare
990a421
to
141c034
Compare
No description provided.