Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add support for multi-memory proposal in classic interpreter #3742

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Aug 21, 2024

Conversation

wenyongh
Copy link
Contributor

Implement multi-memory for classic-interpreter. Support core spec (and bulk memory) opcodes now,
and will support atomic opcodes, and add multi-memory export APIs in the future.

PS: Multi-memory spec test patched a lot for linking test to adapt for multi-module implementation.

wenyongh and others added 5 commits July 10, 2024 16:03
Merge branch main into dev/multi_memory
Merge branch main into dev/multi_memory
Implement multi-memory for classic-interpreter. Support core spec (and bulk memory) opcodes now,
and will support atomic opcodes, and add multi-memory export APIs in the future. 

PS: Multi-memory spec test patched a lot for linking test to adapt for multi-module implementation.
Merge branch main into dev/multi_memory
@wenyongh wenyongh merged commit 1329e1d into main Aug 21, 2024
1053 checks passed
@wenyongh
Copy link
Contributor Author

Merged this PR into branch main from branch dev/multi_memory since the related PR #3570 had been reviewed.

LazyBoy-KK pushed a commit to LazyBoy-KK/wasm-micro-runtime that referenced this pull request Oct 14, 2024
…ealliance#3742)

Implement multi-memory for classic-interpreter. Support core spec (and bulk memory) opcodes now,
and will support atomic opcodes, and add multi-memory export APIs in the future. 

PS: Multi-memory spec test patched a lot for linking test to adapt for multi-module implementation.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants