-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[PM-11360] Remove export permission for providers #12062
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
[PM-11360] Remove export permission for providers #12062
Conversation
…ult-export-permission-for-providers
This reverts commit 0cf1f23.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Tools Team: this is just updating the org.canAccessImportExport
property reference, which has been split into org.canAccessImport
and org.canAccessExport
. Given that this is the import component, it now refers to org.canAccessImport
.
canAccessImport(this.i18nService), | ||
map((orgs) => orgs.filter((org) => org.canAccessImport)), | ||
map((orgs) => orgs.sort(Utils.getSortFunction(this.i18nService, "name"))), |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The canAccessImport
helper function in organization.service.abstraction
has also been removed because it was only used here and this is all it was doing.
); | ||
} | ||
|
||
canAccessExport(removeProviderExport: boolean) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It's a bit awkward to make callers fetch their own feature flag value to pass in. I tried some other approaches, but introducing any observable or promise here makes pretty large waves through all its callers. This remains the simplest approach for now.
Fixed Issues
|
} | ||
|
||
return ( | ||
this.isMember && |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is necessary because some of our model mapping is wrong. I've logged a bug here: https://bitwarden.atlassian.net/browse/PM-15078
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
✅ All tests successful. No failed tests found. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #12062 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 33.44% 33.46% +0.01%
==========================================
Files 2863 2863
Lines 89638 89633 -5
Branches 17059 17059
==========================================
+ Hits 29983 29992 +9
+ Misses 57294 57280 -14
Partials 2361 2361 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚨 Try these New Features:
|
🎟️ Tracking
https://bitwarden.atlassian.net/browse/PM-11360
📔 Objective
Remove provider export permissions. Provider users will not have the ability to access an organization’s export tab or export a managed organization’s items.
organization.canAccessImportExport
into separate getters for import and export (providers can still import)Server PR: bitwarden/server#5051
📸 Screenshots
⏰ Reminders before review
🦮 Reviewer guidelines
:+1:
) or similar for great changes:memo:
) or ℹ️ (:information_source:
) for notes or general info:question:
) for questions:thinking:
) or 💭 (:thought_balloon:
) for more open inquiry that's not quite a confirmed issue and could potentially benefit from discussion:art:
) for suggestions / improvements:x:
) or:warning:
) for more significant problems or concerns needing attention:seedling:
) or ♻️ (:recycle:
) for future improvements or indications of technical debt:pick:
) for minor or nitpick changes