Add lamps v1.0.3 #52005
Add lamps v1.0.3 #52005
Conversation
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe pull request introduces a new Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
recipes/lamps/meta.yaml (1)
35-42: Consider adding more comprehensive tests.While the current tests verify basic functionality, consider adding more specific tests for scientific features, such as testing basic data processing capabilities.
Consider adding more test commands:
commands: - pip check - lamp --help + - lamp --version + - python -c "from lamp import __version__; assert __version__ == '1.0.3'"
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
recipes/lamps/meta.yaml(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 yamllint
recipes/lamps/meta.yaml
[error] 1-1: syntax error: found character '%' that cannot start any token
(syntax)
🔇 Additional comments (5)
recipes/lamps/meta.yaml (5)
1-6: LGTM! Package metadata is well-structured.
The package name and version are properly templated using Jinja2 variables.
🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint
[error] 1-1: syntax error: found character '%' that cannot start any token
(syntax)
51-53: LGTM! Recipe maintainer is correctly specified.
The maintainer section is properly formatted and includes the PR submitter.
8-10: Verify source package accessibility and integrity.
The URL follows PyPI's standard format and includes a SHA256 checksum.
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the source package URL and checksum
# Test: Check if the URL is accessible and the checksum matches
URL="https://pypi.org/packages/source/l/lamps/lamps-1.0.3.tar.gz"
EXPECTED_SHA="c85de92edcb4cd450aeebcb829729f163a02b3905146ef5208f911f38f2abe63"
# Verify URL accessibility (using curl's HEAD request)
curl -sI "$URL" | head -n 1
# Download and verify checksum
curl -sL "$URL" | sha256sum44-49: Verify license file existence.
The about section is well-structured with all required fields.
✅ Verification successful
License file exists in the package source
The LICENSE file is present in the source package at lamps-1.0.3/LICENSE, confirming that the license_file field in meta.yaml correctly references an existing file.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the LICENSE file exists in the package
# Test: Check if the LICENSE file exists
curl -sL "https://pypi.org/packages/source/l/lamps/lamps-1.0.3.tar.gz" | \
tar tz | grep -E "^[^/]*/LICENSE$"
Length of output: 322
12-17: Verify the entry point module existence.
The build configuration is correct with noarch python and proper pip installation flags.
✅ Verification successful
Entry point verification looks correct
The entry point configuration appears to be valid based on several indicators:
- The package has a proper test section that verifies the
lampcommand withlamp --help - The package imports are tested with
import lamp - The GitHub repository is referenced (wanchanglin/lamp)
- The package is properly published on PyPI with version 1.0.3
The entry point lamp = lamp.__main__:main follows the standard Python package structure, and the test section confirms its functionality.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the entry point module exists in the package
# Test: Check if the __main__.py file exists in the package
curl -sL "https://pypi.org/packages/source/l/lamps/lamps-1.0.3.tar.gz" | \
tar tz | grep -E "lamp/__main__.py$"
Length of output: 322
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's verify the entry point module existence using local repository files
# First, find the package directory
fd -t d "^lamp$"
# Check for __main__.py in any lamp directory
fd "__main__.py" -p "lamp/"
# Also check the package structure
ls -R lamp/ 2>/dev/null || true
# Additionally, let's check the setup.py or pyproject.toml for entry point configuration
fd "setup.py|pyproject.toml"
Length of output: 967
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the actual package source directory structure
fd -t f . recipes/lamps/ --full-path
# Also check the content of meta.yaml to understand the package structure
cat recipes/lamps/meta.yaml
Length of output: 1105
| requirements: | ||
| host: | ||
| - python >=3.8 | ||
| - setuptools >=61.0 | ||
| - wheel | ||
| - pip | ||
| run: | ||
| - python >=3.8 | ||
| - numpy | ||
| - scipy | ||
| - pandas | ||
| - pyside6 | ||
| - pyteomics | ||
| - openpyxl | ||
| - pyjanitor |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider adding version constraints for runtime dependencies.
While the host requirements are well-defined, the runtime dependencies lack version constraints. This could lead to compatibility issues. Additionally, PySide6 is a Qt binding that might need special consideration in Conda.
Consider adding version constraints like this:
run:
- python >=3.8
- - numpy
- - scipy
- - pandas
- - pyside6
- - pyteomics
- - openpyxl
- - pyjanitor
+ - numpy >=1.20
+ - scipy >=1.7
+ - pandas >=1.3
+ - pyside6 >=6.0
+ - pyteomics >=4.0
+ - openpyxl >=3.0
+ - pyjanitor >=0.20Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
Describe your pull request here
Please read the guidelines for Bioconda recipes before opening a pull request (PR).
General instructions
@BiocondaBot please add labelcommand.@bioconda/corein a comment.Instructions for avoiding API, ABI, and CLI breakage issues
Conda is able to record and lock (a.k.a. pin) dependency versions used at build time of other recipes.
This way, one can avoid that expectations of a downstream recipe with regards to API, ABI, or CLI are violated by later changes in the recipe.
If not already present in the meta.yaml, make sure to specify
run_exports(see here for the rationale and comprehensive explanation).Add a
run_exportssection like this:with
...being one of:{{ pin_subpackage("myrecipe", max_pin="x") }}{{ pin_subpackage("myrecipe", max_pin="x.x") }}{{ pin_subpackage("myrecipe", max_pin="x.x") }}(in such a case, please add a note that shortly mentions your evidence for that){{ pin_subpackage("myrecipe", max_pin="x.x.x") }}(in such a case, please add a note that shortly mentions your evidence for that){{ pin_subpackage("myrecipe", max_pin=None) }}while replacing
"myrecipe"with eithernameif aname|lowervariable is defined in your recipe or with the lowercase name of the package in quotes.Bot commands for PR management
Please use the following BiocondaBot commands:
Everyone has access to the following BiocondaBot commands, which can be given in a comment:
@BiocondaBot please update@BiocondaBot please add labelplease review & mergelabel.@BiocondaBot please fetch artifactsYou can use this to test packages locally.
Note that the
@BiocondaBot please mergecommand is now depreciated. Please just squash and merge instead.Also, the bot watches for comments from non-members that include
@bioconda/<team>and will automatically re-post them to notify the addressed<team>.