Upwork job forward, in README details #23
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…to work from his laptop via TeamViewer but in Upwork created the job offer from the company using anomyoused name Rony Do.  @sargilhbark/@barkshass ([email protected]) removed my comments but he created the job offer in upwork and then as interview questions via teamviewer asked: - to improve performance `create_topic` places - reduce size for internal bark-rails app then he submitted as my changes as his pull request to the repo that looked weird and asked about it [explanation](https://dev.to/oivoodoo/story-about-the-clients-in-upwork-31ei)
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
@sargilhbark/@barkshass ([email protected]) removed my comments but he created the job offer in upwork
and then as interview questions via teamviewer asked:
create_topicplacesthen he submitted my changes as his pull request to the repo that looked weird and asked about it
explanation