Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Codecov #90

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Feb 21, 2024
Merged

Codecov #90

merged 2 commits into from
Feb 21, 2024

Conversation

nixel2007
Copy link
Member

@nixel2007 nixel2007 commented Feb 21, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Новые возможности

    • Добавлена новая задача coverage в рабочий процесс, которая выполняется на ubuntu-latest, загружает отчеты о покрытии в Codecov с использованием codecov/[email protected] и указывает токен и сокращение для аутентификации.
  • Исправления ошибок

    • Исправлена небольшая ошибка форматирования в файле рабочего процесса testing.yml, связанная с присвоением параметра oscript_version.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Feb 21, 2024

Warning

Rate Limit Exceeded

@nixel2007 has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 3 minutes and 30 seconds before requesting another review.

How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.
Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.
Please see our FAQ for further information.

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 102ac26 and 68c737b.

Обзор

Внесены изменения в рабочие процессы GitHub Actions, добавляющие новую задачу coverage для отчетов о покрытии кода тестами в .github/workflows/qa.yml и исправляющие небольшую проблему форматирования в файле .github/workflows/testing.yml.

Изменения

Файлы Краткое описание изменений
.github/.../qa.yml Добавлена задача coverage, загрузка отчетов в Codecov.
.github/.../testing.yml Исправлена проблема форматирования параметра oscript_version.

🐰🌟
В полях кода цветет весна,
где баг исправлен, там радость сполна.
Новый отчет летит в Codecov,
в тестах нет больше проблемы снов.
🎉🐇

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share

Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit-tests for this file.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit tests for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository from git and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit tests.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger a review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • The JSON schema for the configuration file is available here.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/coderabbit-overrides.v2.json

CodeRabbit Discord Community

Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Review Status

Actionable comments generated: 0

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 102ac26 and 866c495.
Files selected for processing (2)
  • .github/workflows/qa.yml (1 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/testing.yml (1 hunks)
Additional comments: 2
.github/workflows/testing.yml (1)
  • 16-16: Проверьте, правильно ли указан параметр oscript_version в соответствии с требованиями проекта и спецификациями GitHub Actions. Изменение выглядит корректным и улучшает читаемость файла конфигурации.
.github/workflows/qa.yml (1)
  • 15-24: Добавление задачи coverage выглядит корректно и соответствует лучшим практикам интеграции с Codecov. Убедитесь, что токен для Codecov (CODECOV_TOKEN) безопасно хранится в секретах GitHub и правильно используется в данной конфигурации. Также хорошей практикой является проверка зависимости от задачи sonar, чтобы убедиться, что отчеты о покрытии кода генерируются после успешного выполнения всех необходимых проверок качества кода.

This comment has been minimized.

This comment has been minimized.

1 similar comment

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link

Passed

Analysis Details

0 Issues

  • Bug 0 Bugs
  • Vulnerability 0 Vulnerabilities
  • Code Smell 0 Code Smells

Coverage and Duplications

  • Coverage No coverage information (89.30% Estimated after merge)
  • Duplications No duplication information (0.00% Estimated after merge)

Project ID: autumn

View in SonarQube

@nixel2007 nixel2007 merged commit f93fc91 into master Feb 21, 2024
37 of 41 checks passed
@nixel2007 nixel2007 deleted the feature/codecov branch February 21, 2024 22:05
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant